The intonation of topic and focus
Zaar (Nigeria), Tamasheq (Niger), Juba Arabic (South Sudan) and Tripoli Arabic (Libya)
Bernard Caron | LLACAN (UMR 8135), Inalco, CNRS, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité
A follow-up of the CorpAfroAs project, this paper presents a typologically-oriented study of the intonation of Topic and Focus in four Afroasiatic languages (Zaar, Tamasheq, Juba Arabic and Tripoli Arabic), in relation to their phonological and information structures. The different prosodic systems represented in the study — i.e. the demarcative accent system of Berber, the lexical stress system of Tripoli Arabic; the pitch accent system of Juba Arabic; and the tone system of Zaar — give ground to the study of the correlation between these prosodic systems and their intonation structures; and more particularly, how declination, wich seems to be a universal of the intonation of declarative sentences, interacts with other sentence types, such as Yes/No-Questions, WH-Questions, Exclamations, etc. Likewise, the paper explores the correlation between the prosodic systems and the intonational exponents of Topic and Focus. The paper starts by setting up the concepts and typological frame used for the study. Then, it presents a case study of the four languages, examining their prosodic systems, and the prosodic exponents of topic and focus. Finally, the paper compares the four systems, drawing conclusions from a typoligical point of view. A general rule seems to emerge from the study: lack of a specific intonation pattern for a specific intonation structure is supplemented by morpho-syntactic marking. In other words, the more a structure relies on morpho-syntax, the less it relies on intonation.
References (25)
References
Bearth, Thomas. 1998. Tonalité, déclinaison tonale et structuration du discours - Un point de vue comparatif. In Les unités discursives dans l’analyse sémiotique: La segmentation du discours, Gustavo Quiroz, Ioanna Berthoud-Papandropoulou, Evelyne Thommen & Christina Vogel (eds), 73–7. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caron, Bernard. 2000. Assertion et préconstruit: Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africaines. In Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africaines, Bernard Caron (ed.), 7–42. Louvain: Peeters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caubet, Dominique. 1992. Deixis, aspect et modalité: Les particules hā- et ṛā- en arabe marocain. In La deixis, Marie-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds), 139–149. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornish, Francis. 2005. Une approche pragmatico-discursive des phrases ‘thétiques’. In La syntaxe au coeur de la grammaire, Frédéric Lambert & Henning Nølke (eds),75–84. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Furukawa, Naoyo. 1996. Grammaire de la prédication seconde. Formes, sens et contraintes. Louvain: Duculot.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heath, Jeffrey. 2005. Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kossmann, Maarten. 2011. A Grammar of Ayer Tuareg (Niger) [Berber Studies 30]. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ladd, D.R. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lafkioui, Mena. 2010. La topicalisation en berbère: Formes et structures. In Etudes Berbères V (Actes 5. Bayreuth-Frankfurt-Leidener Kolloquim zur Berberologie 8-11 Octobre 2008), Harry Stroomer (ed.), 121–133. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louali, Naïma & Philippson, Gérard. 2005. Deux systèmes accentuels berbères: Le siwi et le touareg. Faits de langues 26: 11–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lux, Cécile & Philippson, Gérard. 2010. L’accent en tetserret et en tamacheq: Contacts et contrastes. In Etudes Berbères V (Actes 5. Bayreuth-Frankfurt-Leidener Kolloquim zur Berberologie 8-11 Octobre 2008), Harry Stroomer (ed.), 133–164. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manfredi, Stefano. 2009. Counter-assertive focus in Kordofanian Baggara Arabic. Studi Maghrebini VI: 183–194.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manfredi, Stefano & Petrollino, Sara. 2013. Juba Arabic. In The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Structures III: The Language Surveys, Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Magnus Huber & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 54–65. Oxford: OUP.
Manfredi, Stefano & Tosco, Mauro. 2014. The morphosyntax and prosody of topic and focus in Juba Arabic. In Arabic-based pidgins and creoles. Special issue of Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages (29:2): 319–351. Stefano Manfredi & Mauro Tosco (eds).
Mettouchi, Amina. 2003. La focalisation contrastive dans les clivées en kabyle (berbère). In Mémoires de la Société Linguistique de Paris: Fonction et moyens d’expression de la focalisation à travers les langues [Nouvelle Série Tome III], Anne Lacheret-Dujour & Jacques François (eds), 81–97. Leuven: Peeters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morel, Mary-Annick & Danon-Boileau, Laurent. 1998. Grammaire de l’intonation. L’exemple du français oral. Paris: Ophrys.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pereira, Christophe. 2010. Le parler arabe de Tripoli (Libye). Zaragoza: Instituto de Estudios Islámicos y del Oriente Próximo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robert, Stephane. 1993. Structure et sémantique de la focalisation. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris LXXXVIII: 25–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vanhove, Martine. 1996. Les particules qad et ra’ dans un dialecte arabe de Yafi’ (Yémen). In
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of l’Association Internationale pour la Dialectologie Arabe held at Trinity Hall in the University of Cambridge, 10-14 September 1995
. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Yeou, Mohamed, Embarki, Mohamed & Al-Maqtari, Sallal. 2007. contrastive focus and F0 patterns in three Arabic dialects. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 317–326.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmermann, Malte. 2007. Contrastive focus. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6, Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 147–159. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
El Zarka, Dina
2017.
Arabic Intonation. In
Oxford Handbook Topics in Linguistics,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.