Article published in:
Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages: The CorpAfroAs corpus of spoken AfroAsiatic languages
Edited by Amina Mettouchi, Martine Vanhove and Dominique Caubet
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 68] 2015
► pp. 63–115

The intonation of topic and focus

Zaar (Nigeria), Tamasheq (Niger), Juba Arabic (South Sudan) and Tripoli Arabic (Libya)

| LLACAN (UMR 8135), Inalco, CNRS, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité
| DDL-Lacito
| SeDyL (UMR 8202), Inalco, CNRS
| LACNAD, INALCO
A follow-up of the CorpAfroAs project, this paper presents a typologically-oriented study of the intonation of Topic and Focus in four Afroasiatic languages (Zaar, Tamasheq, Juba Arabic and Tripoli Arabic), in relation to their phonological and information structures. The different prosodic systems represented in the study — i.e. the demarcative accent system of Berber, the lexical stress system of Tripoli Arabic; the pitch accent system of Juba Arabic; and the tone system of Zaar — give ground to the study of the correlation between these prosodic systems and their intonation structures; and more particularly, how declination, wich seems to be a universal of the intonation of declarative sentences, interacts with other sentence types, such as Yes/No-Questions, WH-Questions, Exclamations, etc. Likewise, the paper explores the correlation between the prosodic systems and the intonational exponents of Topic and Focus. The paper starts by setting up the concepts and typological frame used for the study. Then, it presents a case study of the four languages, examining their prosodic systems, and the prosodic exponents of topic and focus. Finally, the paper compares the four systems, drawing conclusions from a typoligical point of view. A general rule seems to emerge from the study: lack of a specific intonation pattern for a specific intonation structure is supplemented by morpho-syntactic marking. In other words, the more a structure relies on morpho-syntax, the less it relies on intonation.
Published online: 20 May 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.68.03car
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Caron, Bernard
2018.  In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 199], ► pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bearth, Thomas
1998 Tonalité, déclinaison tonale et structuration du discours - Un point de vue comparatif. In Les unités discursives dans l’analyse sémiotique: La segmentation du discours, Gustavo Quiroz, Ioanna Berthoud-Papandropoulou, Evelyne Thommen & Christina Vogel (eds), 73–7. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Caron, Bernard
2000 Assertion et préconstruit: Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africaines. In Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africaines, Bernard Caron (ed.), 7–42. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Caubet, Dominique
1992 Deixis, aspect et modalité: Les particules hā- et ṛā- en arabe marocain. In La deixis, Marie-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds), 139–149. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis
2005 Une approche pragmatico-discursive des phrases ‘thétiques’. In La syntaxe au coeur de la grammaire, Frédéric Lambert & Henning Nølke (eds),75–84. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Furukawa, Naoyo
1996 Grammaire de la prédication seconde. Formes, sens et contraintes. Louvain: Duculot.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
2005 Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kossmann, Maarten
2011 A Grammar of Ayer Tuareg (Niger) [Berber Studies 30]. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Ladd, D.R.
1996 Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lafkioui, Mena
2010 La topicalisation en berbère: Formes et structures. In Etudes Berbères V (Actes 5. Bayreuth-Frankfurt-Leidener Kolloquim zur Berberologie 8-11 Octobre 2008), Harry Stroomer (ed.), 121–133. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Louali, Naïma & Philippson, Gérard
2005 Deux systèmes accentuels berbères: Le siwi et le touareg. Faits de langues 26: 11–22.Google Scholar
Lux, Cécile
2012 `Tamasheq Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Cécile Lux. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. (= TAQ_CL). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lux, Cécile & Philippson, Gérard
2010 L’accent en tetserret et en tamacheq: Contacts et contrastes. In Etudes Berbères V (Actes 5. Bayreuth-Frankfurt-Leidener Kolloquim zur Berberologie 8-11 Octobre 2008), Harry Stroomer (ed.), 133–164. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Manfredi, Stefano
2009 Counter-assertive focus in Kordofanian Baggara Arabic. Studi Maghrebini VI: 183–194.Google Scholar
2012 ‘Juba Arabic Corpus’. Corpus recorded, transcribed and annotated by Stefano Manfredi. In Amina Mettouchi & Christian Chanard (eds). The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages. (= PGA_SM). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manfredi, Stefano & Petrollino, Sara
2013. Juba Arabic. In The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Structures III: The Language Surveys, Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Magnus Huber & Martin Haspelmath (eds) 54 65 Oxford OUP
Manfredi, Stefano & Tosco, Mauro
2014. The morphosyntax and prosody of topic and focus in Juba Arabic. In Arabic-based pidgins and creoles. Special issue of Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages (29:2): 319–351. Stefano Manfredi & Mauro Tosco (eds)
Mettouchi, Amina
2003 La focalisation contrastive dans les clivées en kabyle (berbère). In Mémoires de la Société Linguistique de Paris: Fonction et moyens d’expression de la focalisation à travers les langues [Nouvelle Série Tome III], Anne Lacheret-Dujour & Jacques François (eds), 81–97. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Morel, Mary-Annick & Danon-Boileau, Laurent
1998 Grammaire de l’intonation. L’exemple du français oral. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul
2000 The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Christophe
2010 Le parler arabe de Tripoli (Libye). Zaragoza: Instituto de Estudios Islámicos y del Oriente Próximo.Google Scholar
Robert, Stephane
1993 Structure et sémantique de la focalisation. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris LXXXVIII: 25–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine
1996 Les particules qad et ra’ dans un dialecte arabe de Yafi’ (Yémen). In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of l’Association Internationale pour la Dialectologie Arabe held at Trinity Hall in the University of Cambridge, 10-14 September 1995 . Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Yeou, Mohamed, Embarki, Mohamed & Al-Maqtari, Sallal
2007 contrastive focus and F0 patterns in three Arabic dialects. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 317–326.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2007 Contrastive focus. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6, Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 147–159. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar