Article published in:
Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston
Edited by Nicholas Groom, Maggie Charles and Suganthi John
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 73] 2015
► pp. 235–256

Chapter 10. Language description and language learning

The pedagogic corpus and learners as researchers

Traditional pedagogic language descriptions are grammar-based and oversimplified, ignoring important aspects of the way text is created, for example through complex collocational attraction (Sinclair 1991) or lexical priming (Hoey 2005, this volume). If a teaching methodology is to allow for the full complexity of language, it needs to make more productive use of the learner’s creativity, treating the learner not as a passive consumer of rules, but as a researcher, exploring a corpus of texts – a pedagogic corpus. Such a methodology has profound implications for materials writers. Specifically, materials writers need to:– select texts to form an appropriate pedagogic corpus;– prepare communicative tasks to enable learners to process those texts for meaning;– provide form-focused activities to encourage learners, with teacher guidance, to develop a model of the language for themselves.
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.73.11wil
References
Channell, J
1994 Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
1993 Second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers? An interview with Rod Ellis. ELT Journal 47(1): 3-11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francis G., Hunston S. & Manning E
1996 Grammar Patterns, 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
1998 Grammar Patterns, 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Hoey, M
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. & McCarthy, M
1998 From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 32(2): 263-287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S
2002 Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. & Francis, G
1999 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, T
1991 Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. In Classroom Concordancing, T. Johns & P. King (eds), 1-16. Birmingham: Birmingham University English Language Research. http://​wordsmithtools​.net​/wordsmith​/corpus​_linguistics​_links​/Tim%20Johns%20and%20DDL​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D
1997 Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18(2): 141-165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M
1993 The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K.P
1992 Emergence of complexity in phonological development. In Phonological Development, C. Ferguson, L. Menn & C. Stoel-Gammon (eds), 635-662. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Nation, I.S.P
2001 Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1): 59-82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F.H
1983 Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication, J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (eds), 191-226. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation: Describing English Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. & Renouf, A.J
1988 Lexical syllabus for language learning. In Vocabulary and Language Teaching, R. Carter & M. McCarthy (eds), 197-206. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Swan, M
2005 Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 26(3): 376–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waldrop, M
1992 Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G
1989 Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics 10: 128-137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Rules, Patterns and Words: Grammar and lexis in English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Three reasons why. In Introducing Applied Linguistics, S. Hunston & D. Oakey (eds), 6-11. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Willis, D. & Willis, J
1996 Consciousness-raising activities. In Challenge and Change in Language Teaching, J. Willis & D. Willis (eds), 63-76. Oxford: Heinemann McMillan.<www​.willis​-elt​.co​.uk​/articles​/>Google Scholar
2007 Doing Task-based Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Willis, J. & Willis, D
1988 The Collins COBUILD English Course, Level 1. London: Collins ELT.Google Scholar