Article published in:
Spanish Learner Corpus Research: Current trends and future perspectives
Edited by Margarita Alonso-Ramos
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 78] 2016
► pp. 169–196

Spanish Corpus Proficiency Level Training Website and Corpus

An open-source, online resource for corpus linguistics studies

| The University of Texas at Austin
| The University of Texas at Austin
Based on previous research on second language learner oral proficiency (e.g. Omaggio Hadley 2001) and related teacher training (e.g. Liskin-Gasparro 2003), the Spanish Corpus Proficiency Level Training website offers an open, online training resource on Spanish learner proficiency levels for future and current Spanish teachers. It provides 327 videotaped segments of 38 learners, including 17 U.S. Spanish heritage learners, of various Spanish proficiency levels who answer the same set of interview questions. The site and the corpus of videotapes offer implications for teachers to help guide their students towards proficiency goals.Given the richness of the video bank, it has shown itself to be useful to goals of corpus linguistics. To illustrate, we examine pronominal subject expression in oral speech by the Spanish heritage language learners of three levels of linguistic proficiency in the corpus. We analyze the learners’ sensitivity to conditioning variables that have been found to affect pronominal expression in Spanish by Spanish heritage speakers in the U.S. The chapter concludes with feedback from site users and suggestions for other uses of the corpus.
Keywords: online training website, oral proficiency, proficiency levels, Spanish as a second language, corpus linguistics, subject pronouns
Published online: 16 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.78.07koi
References

References

Adolphs, S. & Knight, D.
2010 Building a spoken corpus. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 38–52. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K.
2009 Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. ed.
2009 Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Barker, F.
2004 Using corpora in language testing: Research and validation of language tests. Modern English Teacher 13(2): 63–67.Google Scholar
Bayley, R. & Pease-Alvarez, L.
1997 Null pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s Spanish. Language Variation and Change 9:349–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H.
2008 Corpora in Language Acquisition Research: History, Methods, Perspectives [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentivoglio, P.
1987 Los sujetos pronominales de primera persona en el habla de Caracas. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
Bini, M.
1993 La adquisición del italiano: Más allá de las propidades sintácticas del parámetro pro-drop. In La lingüística y el análisis de los sistemas no nativos, J. M. Liceras (ed), 126–139. Ottawa: Dovehouse.Google Scholar
Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M.B. & Zaytseva, E.
2014 Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency. In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, P. Leclerq, H. Hilton & A. Edmonds (eds), 71–90. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Callies, M. & Götz, S. eds
2015 Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Callies, M. & Götz, S.
2015 Learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Prospects and challenges. In Callies & Götz (eds), 1–9.Google Scholar
Cameron, R.
1993 Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change 5(3): 305–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 Switch reference, verb class and priming in a variable syntax. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory 30(2): 27–45.Google Scholar
Carlsen, C.
2012 Proficiency level –A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics 33(2): 161–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. & Leeser, M.
2007 The structure of corpora in SLA research. In Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On, R. Facchinetti (ed.), 289–303. New York NY: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enríquez, E.V.
1984 El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Instituto Miguel de Cervantes.Google Scholar
Evans, M.A.
1985 Self-initiated speech repairs: A reflection of communicative monitoring in young children. Developmental Psychology 21:365–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fehringer, C. & Fry, C.
2007 Hesitation phenomena in the language production of bilingual speakers: The role of working memory. Folia Linguistica 41(1–2): 37–72.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. & Gudmestad, A.
2010 An exploration of the range and frequency of occurrence of forms in potentially-variable structures in second language Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(3): 433–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glisan, E. & Foltz, D.
1998 Assessing students’ oral proficiency in an outcome-based curriculum: Student performance and teacher intuitions. Modern Language Journal 82(1): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Govoni, J. M.& Feyten, C.M.
1999 Effects of the ACTFL-OPI-Type Training on Student Performance, Instructional Methods, and Classroom Materials in the Secondary Foreign Language Classroom. Foreign Language Annals 32(2): 189–200. Crossref.xGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
2002 A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research. In Granger et al.. (eds), 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 538–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. A critical evaluation. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], K. Aijmer (ed.), 13–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J.
1999 Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning 49(2): 303–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J.
1989 On some properties of the pro-drop parameter: Looking for missing subjects in nonnative Spanish. In Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, S.M. Gass & J. Schachter (eds), 109–133. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liskin-Gasparro, J.
2003 The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and the Oral Proficiency Interview: A brief history and analysis of their survival. Foreign Language Annals 36:483–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Baztán, A.
2010 La evaluación de las lenguas. Garantías y limitaciones. Barcelona: Octaedro Andalucía.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A.
2011 Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F.
2002 The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching. In Granger, S., Hung, J. & Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.). Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119�141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
2004 Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7:125–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Rodríguez-Louro, C.
2006 Beyond the syntax of the null subject parameter: A look at the discourse-pragmatic distribution of null and overt subject by learners of Spanish. In The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 41], V. Torrens & L. Escobar (eds), 401–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
2004 Learner corpora and their potential for language teaching. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], J. Sinclair (ed.), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaggio Hadley, A.C.
2001 Teaching Language in Context, 3rd ed. Boston MA: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Osborne, J.
2000 What can students learn from a corpus?: Building bridges between data and explanation. In Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora, L. Burnard & T. McEnery (eds), 165–172. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., Zentella, A.C. & Livert, D.
2007 Language and dialect contact in Spanish of New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language 83(4): 770–802. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pravec, N.
2002 Survey of learner corpora. ICAME Journal 26: 81–114.Google Scholar
Ricardo-Osorio, J.G.
2008 A study of foreign language learning outcomes assessment in U.S. undergraduate education. Foreign Language Annals 41(4): 590–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
2007a When syntax interfaces with pragmatics: The L2 distribution of subject pronouns. Paper presented at On Linguistic Interfaces, Ulster, Northern Ireland, June.Google Scholar
2007b Pragmatic solutions for syntactic problems: Understanding some L2 syntactic errors in terms of discourse-pragmatic deficits. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2005: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 291], S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen & M. Pinto (eds), 299–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 41:951–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, J.K.
1999 Null and Overt Reference in Spanish Second Language Acquisition: A Discourse Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
1982 Subject expression and placement in Mexican-American Spanish. In Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic Aspects, J. Amastae & L. Elías-Olivares (eds), 93–120. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
2004 Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 143–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J.
2009 Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of Meaning [Gesture Studies 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. & Barker, F.
2008 Using corpora for language assessment. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 7, 2nd ed., E. Shohamy & N. Hornberger (eds), 241–256. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R. & Travis, C.E.
2010 Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression. International Journal of Bilingualism 14:1–27.Google Scholar
Travis, C.E.
2005 The yo-yo effect: Priming in subject expression in Colombian Spanish. In Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 272], R. Gess & E.J. Rubin (eds), 329–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine E.
2007 Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19(2): 101–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L.T.
1989 Monitoring in children’s second language speech. Second Language Research 5:141–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witte, J.
2012 Conditioning Variables at Interfaces for Spanish Pronominal Subject Expression: Heritage Language Learners across Proficiency Levels. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Yamada, Aaron, Sam Davidson, Paloma Fernández-Mira, Agustina Carando, Kenji Sagae & Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez
2020. COWS-L2H: A corpus of Spanish learner writing. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8 ► pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.