Article published in:
Spanish Learner Corpus Research: Current trends and future perspectives
Edited by Margarita Alonso-Ramos
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 78] 2016
► pp. 235–265

Chapter 9
Pragmatic principles in anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface

Advanced English learners of Spanish in the CEDEL2 corpus

| Universidad de Granada

Previous experimental research has shown that the syntax-discourse interface can be a locus of deficits for learners, even at very advanced levels. In this paper an L2 Spanish corpus is used to investigate Anaphora Resolution (AR) at the syntax-discourse interface (i.e., how null/overt pronouns and NP subjects refer to their antecedents in discourse). A fine-grained tagset was designed to annotate formal, pragmatic and information-status AR factors in a sample of very advanced L1 English – L2 Spanish learners vs. a Spanish native control subcorpus from the CEDEL2 corpus. The corpus analysis results reveal that, though very advanced learners can attain similar patterns to Spanish natives with AR, they show certain deficits: they are pragmatically more redundant than ambiguous. This is explained in terms of a new proposal: the Pragmatic Principles Violation Hypothesis. Results also show that the syntax of topic shift is more complex than previously assumed, with higher rates of NPs than overt pronouns. This can be accounted for by the nature of the antecedent (number of potential antecedents and their gender differences).

Keywords: anaphora resolution, null pronouns, pragmatics, syntax-discourse interface, topic shift, topic continuity, L2 Spanish, CEDEL2, Pragmatic Principles Violation Hypothesis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Anaphora resolution (AR) in native and learner Spanish
    • 2.1AR in L2 Spanish experimental studies
    • 2.2AR in L2 Spanish corpus-based studies
    • 2.3Summary: AR in L2 Spanish
  • 3.Research questions and predictions
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Corpus
    • 4.2Tagging procedure
    • 4.3Tagset
    • 4.4Tagger
    • 4.5Statistical data analysis
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Syntax-discourse aspects of the anaphor
    • 5.2Pragmatic aspects of the anaphor
    • 5.3The antecedent(s)
    • 5.4Some qualitative observations
    • 5.5Final discussion
  • 6.Conclusion and future research
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.78.09loz
References

References

Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S., Frazier, L. & Clifton, C.
2002 Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Journal of Italian Linguistics 14(2): 151–169.Google Scholar
Bel, A. & García-Alcaraz, E.
2015 Subject pronouns in the L2 Spanish of Moroccan Arabic speakers. In The Acquisition of Spanish in Understudied Language Pairings [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 3], T. Judy & S. Perpiñán (eds), 201–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bel, A., Perera, J., & Salas, N.
2010 Anaphoric devices in written and spoken narrative discourse: Data from Catalan. Written Language & Literacy 13(2): 234–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, S.E.
1998 Constraints on Spanish NP anaphora: The syntactic versus the pragmatic domain. Hispania 81(3): 606–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, S.E. & Quesada, M.L.
2012 Third-person subjects in native speakers’ and L2 learners’ narratives: Testing (and revising) the Givenness Hierarchy for Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, K.L. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (eds), 142–164. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Díaz-Negrillo, A. & Thompson, P.
2013 Learner corpora: Looking towards the future. In Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 59], A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier & P. Thompson (eds), 9–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, P.E., Bailey, K.G.D. & Ferreira, F.
2006 Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity? Journal of Memory and Language 54: 554–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Soriano, O.
1999 El pronombre personal. Formas y distribuciones. Pronombres átonos y tónicos. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, V. Demonte & I. Bosque (eds), 1209–1273. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Filiaci, F.
2010 Null and overt subject biases in Spanish and Italian: A cross-linguistic comparison. In Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría & P. Prévost (eds), 171–182. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
García-Alcaraz, E. & Bel, A.
2011 Selección y distribución de los pronombres en el español L2 de los hablantes de árabe. Revista de Lingüística Y Lenguas Aplicadas 6: 165–179.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K.L. & Gudmestad, A.
2011 Using sociolinguistic analyses of discourse-level features to expand research on L2 variation in forms of Spanish subject expression. In Selected Proceedings of the 2009 Second Language Research Forum, L. Plonsky & M. Schierloh (eds), 16–30. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geluykens, R.
2013 Pragmatics of Discourse Anaphora in English: Evidence from Conversational Repair. Tübingen: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Granger, S.
2009 The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], Aijmer, K. (ed.), 13–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Gilquin, G. & Meunier, F. eds
2015 The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A., House, L. & Geeslin, K.L.
2013 What a Bayesian analysis can do for SLA: New tools for the sociolinguistic study of subject expression in L2 Spanish. Language Learning 63(3): 371–399. Crossref
Gundel, J.K., Mamadou, B., Gordon, B., Humnick, L. & Khalfaoui, A.
2010 Testing predictions of the givenness hierarchy framework: A crosslinguistic investigation. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1770–1785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, A.E., Fernández, E.M. & Aznar-Besé, N.
2007 Bilingual sentence processing. In The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Gaskell, G.M. (ed.), 371–384. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., Van Patten, B. & Keating, G.D.
2011 Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research 27(4): 481–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Judy, T.
2015 Knowledge and processing of subject-related discourse properties in L2 near-native speakers of Spanish, L1 Farsi. In The Acquisition of Spanish in Understudied Language Pairings [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Languages 3], T. Judy & S. Perpiñán (eds), 169–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Liceras, J., de la Fuente, A.A. & Martínez Sanz, C.
2010 The distribution of null subjects in non-native grammars: Syntactic markedness and interface vulnerability. In Proceedings of the 2009 Mind/Context Divide Workshop, M. Iverson, I. Ivanov, , T. Judy, J. Rothman, R. Slabakova & M. Tryzna (eds), 84–95. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lozano, C.
in press. The development of anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface: pronominal subjects in Greek learners of Spanish. In Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
2002 The interpretation of overt and null pronouns in non-native Spanish. Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 53–66.Google Scholar
2009a CEDEL2: Corpus Escrito del Español L2. In Applied Linguistics Now: Understanding Language and Mind/La lingüística aplicada actual: Comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente, C.M. Bretones, J.F. Fernández Sánchez, J.R. Ibáñez Ibáñez, M.E. García Sánchez, M.E. Cortés de los Ríos, S. Salaberri Ramiro, M.S. Cruz Martínez, N.P. Honeyman & B. Cantizano Márquez. (eds), 197–212. Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
2009b Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface: Evidence from the CEDEL2 corpus. In Representational Deficits in Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N Snape, Y-k. I. Leung & M. Sharwood-Smith (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lozano, C. & Díaz-Negrillo, A.
Forthcoming. L2 acquisition and learner corpora: The morpheme order studies revisited with interlanguage Annotation. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research.
Lozano, C. & Mendikoetxea, A.
2013 Learner corpora and second language acquisition: The design and collection of CEDEL2. In Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 59], A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier & P. Thompson (eds), 65–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margaza, P., & Bel, A.
2006 Null subjects at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Evidence from Spanish interlanguage of Greek speakers. In Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006), G. O’Brien, C. Shea & Archibald (eds), 88–97. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A.
2014 Corpus-based research in second language Spanish. In The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition, Geeslin, K.L. (ed.), 11–29. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. & Rodríguez-Louro, C.
(2006 Beyond the syntax of the Null Subject Parameter: A look at the discourse-pragmatic distribution of null and overt subjects by L2 learners of Spanish. In The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 41], V. Torrens & L. Escobar (eds), 401–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F.
2007 Investigating learner language development with electronic longitudinal corpora: Theoretical and methodological issues. In The Longitudinal study of Advanced L2 Capacities, L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (eds), 58–72. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2015 Second language acquisition theory and learner corpus research. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, S. Granger, G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (eds). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.
2009 The UAM Corpus Tool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Applied Linguistics Now: Understanding Language and Mind/La lingüística aplicada actual: Comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente, C.M. Bretones & et al.. (eds), 1433–1447. Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
Perales, S., & Portillo, R.
2007 Sobre las propiedades referenciales de los sujetos nulos y pronominales del español oral y escrito. In Las destrezas orales en la enseñanza del español L2-LE, Vol. 2, E. Balmaseda Maestu (ed.), 889–900. Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. & Glass, W.R.
1999 Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research 15(2): 220–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quesada, M.L.
2014 Subject pronouns in second language Spanish. In The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition, Geeslin, K.L. (ed.), 253–269. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roberts, L.
2013 Sentence processing in bilinguals. In Sentence Processing, R.P.G. van Gompel (ed.), 221–246. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, J.
2009 Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 951–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin, N.L. & Smith Cairns, H.
2009 Subject pronouns in child Spanish and continuity of reference. In Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Collentine, J., M. García, B. Lafford & F. Marcos Marín (eds), 155–164. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
2005 How to build a corpus. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, M. Wynne (ed.), 79–83. Oxford: Oxbow books.Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
2011 Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L.
2009 Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 195–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toribio, A. J.
2000 Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua 10: 315–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
University of Wisconsin
1998 The University of Wisconsin College-Level Placement Test: Spanish (Grammar) Form 96M. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press. http://​testing​.wisc​.edu​/centerpages​/spanishtest​.html
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

de Rocafiguera, Núria & Aurora Bel
2022. On the impact of clause order on pronoun resolution: evidence from Spanish. Folia Linguistica 56:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
García-Alcaraz, Estela & Aurora Bel
2019. Does empirical data from bilingual and native Spanish corpora meet linguistic theory? The role of discourse context in variation of subject expression . Applied Linguistics Review 10:4 ► pp. 491 ff. Crossref logo
García-Tejada, Aída
2022. Direct object anaphora resolution in L1 English-L2 Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes
2022. Development of grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatics in an additional language: insights from Spanish learner corpus research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lozano, Cristóbal
2018. The Development of Anaphora Resolution at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Pronominal Subjects in Greek Learners of Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:2 ► pp. 411 ff. Crossref logo
Lozano, Cristóbal
2022. CEDEL2: Design, compilation and web interface of an online corpus for L2 Spanish acquisition research. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 965 ff. Crossref logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Marcus Callies
2018.  In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 419 ff. Crossref logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Ana Díaz-Negrillo
2019. Using learner corpus methods in L2 acquisition research. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 82 ff. Crossref logo
López-Beltrán, Priscila, Michael A Johns, Paola E Dussias, Cristóbal Lozano & Alfonso Palma
2022. The effects of information structure in the processing of word order variation in the second language. Second Language Research 38:3 ► pp. 639 ff. Crossref logo
Maraschin Bruscato, Amanda & Jorge Baptista
2022. The synchronous and asynchronous learning of anaphora: A corpus-based analysis with learners of English and Spanish. Research in Corpus Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Margaza, Panagiota & Anna Gavarró
2022. The Distribution of Subjects in L2 Spanish by Greek Learners. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Mendikoetxea, Amaya & Cristóbal Lozano
2018. From Corpora to Experiments: Methodological Triangulation in the Study of Word Order at the Interfaces in Adult Late Bilinguals (L2 learners). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:4 ► pp. 871 ff. Crossref logo
Quesada, Teresa & Cristóbal Lozano
2020. WHICH FACTORS DETERMINE THE CHOICE OF REFERENTIAL EXPRESSIONS IN L2 ENGLISH DISCOURSE?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:5 ► pp. 959 ff. Crossref logo
Tsiplakou, Stavroula
2017. Imperfect Acquisition of a Related Variety? Residual Clefting and What It Reveals about (Gradient) Bilectalism. Frontiers in Communication 2 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.