Trends in Teenage Talk
Corpus compilation, analysis and findings
Teenage talk is fascinating, though so far teenage language has not been given the attention in linguistic research that it merits. The dearth of investigations into teenage language is due in part to under representation in language corpora. With the Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language (COLT) a large corpus of teenage language has become available for research. The first part of Trends in Teenage Talk gives a description how the COLT corpus was collected and processed; the speakers are presented with special emphasis on the recruits and their various backgrounds; ending with a description what the COLT teenagers talk about and how they do it. The second part of the book is devoted to the most prominent features of the teenagers’ talk: ‘slanguage’; how reported speech is manifested; a survey of non-standard grammatical features; the use of intensifiers; tags; and interactional behaviour in terms of conflict talk.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 8] 2002. xii, 229 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Introduction: Why study teenage talk?
|
ix–xi
|
|
1. From tape to CD-ROM
|
1–11
|
|
2. The speakers
|
13–26
|
|
3. The conversations
|
27–61
|
|
4. Slanguage
|
63–106
|
|
5. Variation in the use of reported speech
|
107–129
|
|
6. Non-standard grammar and the trendy use of intensifiers
|
131–163
|
|
7. Teenagers’ use of tags
|
165–191
|
|
8. Ritual conflict
|
193–209
|
|
9. Conclusion
|
211–214
|
|
References
|
215–220
|
|
Appendix
|
221–222
|
|
Index
|
223–228
|
“
Trends in teenage talk gives an informative account of the main features and developments in the language of London teenagers in the early 1990s. It is a fascinating and entertaining book on a fascinating research object: the language of children on their way to become adults”
Ute Römer, University of Hannover, in Language
“The book presents brilliant description on the generation, processing, and analysis of the Corpus of London Teenagers (COLT). Many new findings and their subsequent introspective analysis have generated interesting insights about the London teenagers in general, and their linguistic skills in particular. To attain this, the investigators have deployed an intelligent method for data collection both from formal and informal speech sequences, and used a method to process and analyzes the whole corpus to arrive at the final outputs not known before.”
Niladri Sekhar Dash, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India on Linguist List 14.1736, 2003
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2013.
In Quotatives,
► pp. 245 ff. 
No author info given
2014.
In Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing, 47],
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. ix ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. xi ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 1 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 7 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 25 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 43 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 69 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 103 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 147 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 181 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 205 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 213 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 229 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 233 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English Around the World, G48],
► pp. 235 ff.
No author info given
2015.
In South Pacific Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G52],
No author info given
2018.
In Compliments and Positive Assessments [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 289],
No author info given
2018.
In Tag Questions in Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 83],
Adolphs, Svenja, Sarah Atkins & Kevin Harvey
2007.
In Vague Language Explored,
► pp. 62 ff.
Aijmer, Karin
2018.
In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292],
► pp. 177 ff.
Aijmer, Karin
2020.
In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],
► pp. 143 ff.
Andersen, Gisle
2016. Semi-lexical features in corpus transcription.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
Anderson, Wendy
2008. Corpus Linguistics in the UK: Resources for Sociolinguistic Research.
Language and Linguistics Compass 2:2 ► pp. 352 ff.
Barbieri, Federica
2008. Patterns of age-based linguistic variation in American English.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Barron, Anne
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 203 ff.
Bauer, Laurie, Janet Holmes & Paul Warren
2006.
In Language Matters,
► pp. 135 ff.
Beltrama, Andrea & Laura Staum Casasanto
2017.
Totally
tall sounds
totally
younger: Intensification at the socio‐semantics interface
.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 21:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
Cheshire, Jenny
2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Ciampi, Debora
2019.
In Reassessing Dubbing [Benjamins Translation Library, 148],
► pp. 264 ff.
D'Arcy, Alexandra
2015. Stability, stasis and change.
Diachronica 32:4 ► pp. 449 ff.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & S. Arulmozi
2018.
In History, Features, and Typology of Language Corpora,
► pp. 35 ff.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & S. Arulmozi
2018.
In History, Features, and Typology of Language Corpora,
► pp. 221 ff.
Dash, Niladri Sekhar & S. Arulmozi
2018.
In History, Features, and Typology of Language Corpora,
► pp. 259 ff.
Davydova, Julia
2016.
In World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G57],
► pp. 173 ff.
Deterding, David & Salbrina Sharbawi
2013.
In Brunei English [Multilingual Education, 4],
► pp. 71 ff.
Doval-Suárez, Susana M. & Elsa M. González Álvarez
2018.
In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296],
► pp. 145 ff.
Drange, Eli-Marie Danbolt, Ingrid Kristine Hasund & Anna-Brita Stenström
2014. "Your mum!
"Teenagers’ swearing by mother in English, Spanish and Norwegian.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Fernández, Julieta
2018. “I think I sound stupid if I try to use those words”: The role of metapragmatic awareness in the study abroad language classroom.
Foreign Language Annals 51:2 ► pp. 430 ff.
Fuchs, Robert
2017. Do women (still) use more intensifiers than men?.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 345 ff.
Gabrielatos, Costas, Eivind Nessa Torgersen, Sebastian Hoffmann & Susan Fox
2010. A Corpus-Based Sociolinguistic Study of Indefinite Article Forms in London English.
Journal of English Linguistics 38:4 ► pp. 297 ff.
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
2018.
In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296],
► pp. 109 ff.
Harrison, Mark & Phoenix Lam
2020.
In Expanding Horizons in Health Communication [The Humanities in Asia, 6],
► pp. 47 ff.
Ho, Wing Yee Jenifer
2019. ‘I knew that you were there, so I was talking to you’: the use of screen-recording videos in online language learning research.
Qualitative Research ► pp. 146879411988504 ff.
Jaspers, Jürgen
2008. Problematizing ethnolects: Naming linguistic practices in an Antwerp secondary school.
International Journal of Bilingualism 12:1-2 ► pp. 85 ff.
Karachaliou, Rania & Argiris Archakis
2015. Identity construction patterns via swearing:.
Pragmatics and Society 6:3 ► pp. 421 ff.
Kendall, Tyler
2013.
In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change,
► pp. 38 ff.
Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Bert Cornillie
2014.
In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63],
► pp. 321 ff.
Kirk, John M.
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 89 ff.
Levey, Stephen
2006. Tense Variation in Preadolescent Narratives.
Journal of English Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 126 ff.
Levey, Stephen
2012. General Extenders and Grammaticalization: Insights from London Preadolescents.
Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
Liu, Chen-Yu
2019. Gender and Discipline: Intensifier Variation in Academic Lectures.
Corpus Pragmatics 3:3 ► pp. 211 ff.
Love, Robbie, Claire Dembry, Andrew Hardie, Vaclav Brezina & Tony McEnery
2017. The Spoken BNC2014.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2012. On the Use ofAs If, As Though, andLikein Present-Day English Complementation Structures.
Journal of English Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 172 ff.
McCarthy, Michael & Anne O'Keeffe
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Murphy, Bróna
2009. ‘She's a fucking ticket’: the pragmatics of fuck in Irish English – an age and gender perspective.
Corpora 4:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Murphy, Bróna
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 65 ff.
Núñez Pertejo, Paloma & Ignacio M. Palacios Martínez
2014.
That’s absolutely crap, totally rubbish
.
Functions of Language 21:2 ► pp. 210 ff.
O'Boyle, Aisling
2013. Valuing the talk of young people: are we nearly there yet?.
London Review of Education
Overstreet, Maryann
2014. The role of pragmatic function in the grammaticalization of English general extenders.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Palacios, Ignacio M.
2019.
Vernon never called for me yesterday
.
English Text Construction 12:2 ► pp. 290 ff.
PALACIOS MARTÍNEZ, IGNACIO
2015. Variation, development and pragmatic uses ofinnitin the language of British adults and teenagers.
English Language and Linguistics 19:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M
2013. Zero quoting in the speech of British and Spanish teenagers: A contrastive corpus-based study.
Discourse Studies 15:4 ► pp. 439 ff.
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
2011. The Expression of Negation in British Teenagers’ Language: A Preliminary Study.
Journal of English Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
2020. Taboo vocatives in the language of London teenagers.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M. & Paloma Núñez Pertejo
2014. Strategies used by English and Spanish teenagers to intensify language.
Spanish in Context 11:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M. & Paloma Núñez Pertejo
2015. “Go up to miss thingy”. “He’s probably like a whatsit or something”..
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 25:3 ► pp. 425 ff.
Palacios-Martínez, Ignacio M.
2016.
In World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G57],
► pp. 61 ff.
Pennington, Martha C., Lawrence Lau & Itesh Sachdev
2011. Diversity in adoption of linguistic features of London English by Chinese and Bangladeshi adolescents.
Language Learning Journal 39:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
PICHLER, HEIKE & STEPHEN LEVEY
2011. In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: general extenders in northeast England.
English Language and Linguistics 15:3 ► pp. 441 ff.
Reichelt, Susan & Mercedes Durham
2017. Adjective Intensification as a Means of Characterization.
Journal of English Linguistics 45:1 ► pp. 60 ff.
Roth-Gordon, Jennifer
2007. Youth, slang, and pragmatic expressions: Examples from Brazilian Portuguese.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:3 ► pp. 322 ff.
Ruzaitė, Jūratė
2018. General extenders and discourse variation.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
Rühlemann, Christoph
2010. Conversational Grammar- Feminine Grammar? A Sociopragmatic Corpus Study.
Journal of English Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Rühlemann, Christoph
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Scheibman, Joanne
2014.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Schneider, Edgar W. & Ulrich Miethaner
2006. When Istarted to usingBLUR.
Journal of English Linguistics 34:3 ► pp. 233 ff.
SECOVA, MARIA
2014. ‘Je sais et tout mais . . .’ might the general extenders in European French be changing?.
Journal of French Language Studies 24:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
Smith, Catherine, Svenja Adolphs, Kevin Harvey & Louise Mullany
2014. Spelling errors and keywords in born-digital data: a case study using the Teenage Health Freak Corpus.
Corpora 9:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Stange, Ulrike
2017. “You’re So Not Going to Believe This”:.
American Speech 92:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Stange, Ulrike
2020. “Holding Grudges Is So Last Century”: The Use of GenX So as a Modifier of Noun Phrases.
Journal of English Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
Stenström, Anna-Brita
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Stenström, Anna-Brita
2014. Avoid silence! Keep talking!.
Functions of Language 21:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Stenström, Anna-Brita
2017.
In Advances in Swearing Research [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 282],
► pp. 158 ff.
Stenström, Anna-Brita
2020.
In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97],
► pp. 266 ff.
Stratton, James
2018. The Use of the Adjective Intensifier well in British English: A Case Study of The Inbetweeners.
English Studies 99:8 ► pp. 793 ff.
Stratton, James M.
2020. A diachronic analysis of the adjective intensifier well from Early Modern English to Present Day English.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 65:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis
2010. The Stuff of Change: General Extenders in Toronto, Canada.
Journal of English Linguistics 38:4 ► pp. 335 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Katharina Pabst
2020. A Cool Comparison: Adjectives of Positive Evaluation in Toronto, Canada and York, England.
Journal of English Linguistics 48:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Tottie, Gunnel & Sebastian Hoffmann
2006. Tag Questions in British and American English.
Journal of English Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 283 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
WEE, LIONEL
2010. The particle ya in Colloquial Singapore English.
World Englishes 29:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
WILSON, GUYANNE, MICHAEL WESTPHAL, JOHANNA HARTMANN & DAGMAR DEUBER
2017. The use of question tags in different text types of Trinidadian English.
World Englishes 36:4 ► pp. 726 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General