Cover not available
Part of
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 159–186

Chapter 7
Lexical bundles in Early Modern and Present-day English Acts of Parliament

| University of Helsinki

This chapter analyses three-word sequences in Early Modern and Present-day English legal writing by defining their grammatical and functional distribution in Acts of Parliament. The method follows a corpus-driven approach: the lexical bundles are retrieved automatically from the corpus using frequency as the criterion. The study indicates that lexical bundles in acts extend to the textual level and reveals consistent word combinations on the level of the lexis. The study illustrates that the acts are established as a genre, and the overall distribution of both grammatical types and functions of bundles is rather similar in all the analysed periods. Nevertheless, textual organisation is more important in contemporary acts and textual links further become more specific, although early modern bundles already show textual patterning. Noun phrase and prepositional phrases also increase in contemporary acts, indicating a change to nominal writing conventions.

Keywords: lexical bundles, legal writing, textual organisation, Early Modern English, Present-day English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The definition of lexical bundles
    • 2.1Bundles, legal language and genre conventions
    • 2.2Grammatical structure and the functions of lexical bundles
  • 3.The Corpus of Early Modern English Statutes and Acts of Parliament from 2015
  • 4.Method of analysis
  • 5.Distribution of lexical bundles in the historical and contemporary acts
  • 6.Distribution of lexical bundles across different grammatical categories
  • 7.The functions of bundles in legal writing
  • 8.Diachronic development of lexical bundles in the early modern acts
  • 9.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • Corpora and tools
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.07leh
References

Corpora and tools

Anthony, Laurence
2014 AntConc 3.4.3. Corpus software. Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL]
Early English Books Online (EEBO)
[URL]
Early English Books Online – Text Creation Partnership (EEBO-TCP)
[URL]
The National Archives
Records of Public General Acts. [URL]
Aarts, Bas, López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén
2012 Late Modern English: Syntax. In English Historical Linguistics, Vol. I, Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds), 869–887. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1998 On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of current word-combinations. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), 100–122. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baron, Alistair, Rayson, Paul & Archer, Dawn
2009 Automatic standardization of spelling for historical text mining. In The Proceedings of Digital Humanities 2009, 309–312. College Park MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006 University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana
2004 If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech [Łódź Studies in Language 8], Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson & Tony McEnery (eds), 71–105. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2013 Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johanson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2013 Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2): 229–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carney, Edward
1994 A Survey of English Spelling. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Ruth, Peikola, Matti, Salmi, Hanna, Varila, Mari-Liisa, Skaffari, Janne & Hiltunen, Risto
2013 Pragmatics on the page. European Journal of English Studies 17(1): 54–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, Viviana
2013  The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda
1980 Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review 14(3): 445–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1985 Structures of news in the press. In Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication, Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), 69–93. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
1996 Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(1): 91–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elton, Geoffrey Rudolph
1983 Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government, Vol. 3: Papers and Reviews 1973–1981. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1991 Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1978 Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008  As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2013a The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs: Standardization and Lexical Bundles 1380–1560. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Formulaic discourse across Early Modern English medical genres: Investigating shared lexical bundles. In Meaning in the History of English: Words and Texts in Context [Studies in Language Companion Series 148], Andreas H. Jucker, Daniela Landert, Annina Seiler & Nicole Studer-Joho (eds), 257–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Long lexical bundles and standardisation in historical legal texts. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47(2–3): 3–26.Google Scholar
2017 Terms and conditions: a comparative study of noun binomials in UK and Scottish legislation. In Phraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings: A Corpus-based Perspective, Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski & Gianluca Pontrandolfo (eds.), 160-185. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehto, Anu
2015a Corpus of Early Modern English Statutes (1491–1707). Unpublished corpus. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
2015b The Genre of Early Modern English Statutes: Complexity in Historical Legal Writing [Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 97]. Helsinki: Modern Language Society.Google Scholar
2017. Binomials and multinomials in Early Modern English parliamentary acts. In Binomials in the History of English: Fixed and Flexible, Joanna Kopaczyk & Hans Sauer eds 241 260 Cambridge CUP
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio
2006 Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F.
2015 Corpus-based and corpus-driven approaches to linguistic analysis: One and the same? In Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence, Irma Taavitsainen, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge & Jeremy Smith (eds), 14–28. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
1998 Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1976 Classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Swales, John
2004 Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison
2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cichosz, Anna, Łukasz Grabowski & Piotr Pęzik
2024. Formulaic language in Old English prose. Journal of Historical Pragmatics DOI logo
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. Chapter 8. Interpersonality in legal written discourse. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.