Cover not available
Part of
Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change
Edited by Richard J. Whitt
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 85] 2018
► pp. 1–16

Using diachronic corpora to understand the connection between genre and language change

| The University of Nottingham
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What is genre?
  • 3.Diachronic corpora: Challenges in design, compilation, and use
  • 4.Some diachronic corpora
  • 5.The present volume
  • 6.Reflection
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.85.01whi
References (78)
References
Archer, Dawn. 2014. Historical pragmatics: Evidence from the Old Bailey. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2): 259–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn, Culpeper, Jonathan & Davies, Matthew. 2009. Pragmatic annotation. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 613–642. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita, Schreier, Daniel & Watts, Richard J. 2015. Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. The problem of speech genres. In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds), Vern W. McGee (trans.), 60–102. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Alistair & Rayson, Paul. 2008. VARD 2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics, Aston University , Birmingham, UK, 22 May 2008. <[URL]> (12 July 2017).
Bennett, Paul, Durrell, Martin, Scheible, Silke & Whitt, Richard J. 2013. New Methods in Historical Corpora. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62(2): 384–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward & Atkinson, Dwight. 1993. ARCHER and its challenges: Compiling and exploring a representative corpus of historical English registers. In English Language Corpora. Design, Analysis and Exploitation, Jan Aarts, Pieter de Haan & Nelleke Oostdijk (eds), 1–13. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2009. Historical corpora. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 242–259. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coussé, Evie. 2010. Een digitaal compilatiecorpus historisch Nederlands. Lexikos 20: 123–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne. 2009. Historical corpus linguistics and evidence of language change. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 1091–1109. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2012. Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400 million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7: 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deumert, Ana. 2004. Language Standardization and Language Change: The Dynamics of Cape Dutch [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Genre in linguistic and related discourses. In Towards a History of English as a History of Genres, Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds), 3–43. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Dipper, Stefanie. 2011. Morphological and part-of-speech tagging of historical language data: A comparison. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 26(2): 25–37.Google Scholar
Durrell, Martin. 2015. ‘Representativeness’, ‘bad data’, and legitimate expectations: What can an electronic historical corpus tell us what we didn’t actually know already (and how)? In Gippert & Gehrke (eds), 13–33.Google Scholar
Durrell, Martin, Bennett, Paul, Scheible, Silke, Whitt, Richard J. & Ensslin, Astrid. 2012. GerManC Corpus: A Representative, Multi-Genre Corpus of Early Modern German, 1650–1800. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive. <[URL]> (17 July 2017).Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne & Martin, James R. 1997. Genres and registers of discourse. In Discourse as Structure and Process, Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), 230–256. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2014. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, Juan M. Hernándex-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), 156–169. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geyken, Alexander & Gloning, Thomas. 2015. A living text archive of 15th–19th-century German: Corpus strategies, technology, organization. In Gippert & Gehrke (eds), 165–179.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost & Gehrke, Ralf. 2015. Historical Corpora: Challenges and Perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Grund, Peter J. 2012. The nature of knowledge: Evidence and evidentiality in the witness depositions from the Salem witch trials. American Speech 87(1): 7–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Gries, Stefan Th. 2016. Quantitative approaches to diachronic corpus linguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds), 36–53. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyon, Sunny. 1996. Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30(4): 693–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. 1979. The alterity and modernity of medieval literature. New Literary History 10(2): 181–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Stig. 2009. Some aspects of the development of corpus linguistics in the 1970s and 1980s. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 33–53. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Taavitsainen, Irma. 2013. English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43.Google Scholar
. 2007. Schriftlichkeit und kommunkative Distanz. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 35: 346–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Language of immediacy – language of distance: Orality and literacy from the perspective of language theory and linguistic history. In Communicative Spaces. Variation, Contact, and Change. Papers in Honour of Ursula Schaefer, Claudia Lange, Beatrix Weber & Göran Wolf (eds), 441–473. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2), 2nd edn. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. <[URL]> (12 July 2017).Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. <[URL]> (12 July 2017).Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 2010. Data in historical pragmatics. In The Handbook of Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 33–67. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja, Grund, Peter J. & Walker, Terry. 2011. Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1992. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1: 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lenders, Winfried & Wegera, Klaus-Peter. 1982. Maschinelle Auswertung sprachhistorischer Quellen: Ein Bericht zur computerunterstützten Analyse der Flexionsmorphologie des Frühneuhochdeutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2009. Corpora and the study of recent change in language. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 1109–1125. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew. 2012. Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Baker, Helen. 2016. Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as social action. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moessner, Lilo. 2001. Genre, text type, style, register: A terminological maze? European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 131–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & Crespo García, Begoña. 2007. Presenting the Coruña Corpus: A collection of samples for the historical study of English scientific writing. In ‘Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed’: New Insights into Late Modern English, Javier Pérez Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso & Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds), 341–357. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2012. Astronomy ‘playne and simple’: The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel, Camiña Rioboo, Gonzalo, Lareo, Inés & Crespo García, Begoña. 2016. ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & Paraper López, Javier. 2008. Writing science, compiling science: The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. In Proceedings from the 31st AEDEAN Conference, María Jesús Lorenzo Modia (ed.), 531–544. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2013. English historical corpora in transition: From new tools to legacy corpora? In Bennett et al. (eds), 37–53. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Nurmi, Arja. 1998. Manual for the Corpus of Early English Correspondence Sampler (CEECS). Department of English, The University of Helsinki. <[URL]> (14 July 2017).Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi & Taavitsainen, Irma. 2010. Scientific discourse. In The Handbook of Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 549–586. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul, Archer, Dawn, Baron, Alistair & Smith, Nick. 2007. Tagging historical corpora – The problem of spelling variation. Proceedings of Digital Historical Corpora, Dagstuhl-Seminar 06491, International Conference and Research Center for Computer Science, Schloss Dagstuhl, Wadern, Germany, 3rd–8th December 2006. <[URL]> (12 July 2017).
Rayson, Paul & Stevenson, Mark. 2009. Sense and semantic tagging. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 564–579. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1989. Three problems connected with the use of diachronic corpora. ICAME Journal 13: 16–19.Google Scholar
. 2009. Corpus linguistics and historical linguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 53–68. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, Ingason, Anton Karl, Sigurðsson, Einar Freyr & Wallenberg, Joel. 2011. Creating a dual-purpose treebank. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 26(2): 141–152.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Marco, Cristina, Boleda, Gemma & Padró, Lluís. 2011. Extending the tool, or how to annotate historical language varieties. Proceedings of the ACL-HLT 2011 Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTeCH 2011) . Portland, Oregon. June 24, 2011. 1–9. <[URL]> (12 July 2017).
Scheible, Silke, Whitt, Richard J., Durrell, Martin & Bennett, Paul. 2011. A gold standard corpus of early modern German. Proceedings of the 5th LAW Workshop . Portland, Oregon, June 23–24, 2011, 124–128. <[URL]> (12 July 2017).
. 2012. GATE to GerManC: A GATE-based annotation pipeline for historical German. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012) . Istanbul, Turkey, May 21–27, 2012, 3611–3617. <[URL]> (12 July 2017).
Springmann, Uwe & Lüdeling, Anke. 2017. OCR of historical printings with an application to building diachronic corpora: A case study using the RIDGES herbal corpus. Digital Humanities Quarterly 11(2). <[URL]> (12 July 2017).Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi. 2004. Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Medical Writing in Early Modern English Medical Texts. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi & Mäkinen, Martti. 2005. Middle English Medical Texts. CD-ROM. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Hiltunen, Turo, Lehto, Anu, Marttila, Villa, Pahta, Päivi, Ratia, Maura, Suhr, Carla & Tyrkkö, Jukka. 2014. Late Modern English Medical Texts 1700–1800: A corpus for analysing eighteenth-century medical English. ICAME Journal 38: 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, Christine M. & Swales, John M. 2014. Genre analysis. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 165–187. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teubert, Wolfgang. 2005. My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Christian, & Wiegand, Frank. 2015. Making great work even better: Appraisal and digital curation of widely dispersed electronic textual resources (c. 15th–19th centuries) in CLARIN-D. In Gippert & Gehrke (eds), 181–196.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George. 2016. The HeliPaD: A parsed corpus of Old Saxon. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(4): 559–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegera, Klaus-Peter. 2013. Language data exploitation: Design and analysis of historical language corpora. In Bennett et al. (eds), 55–73. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Whitt, Richard J. 2016a. Evidentiality in early modern English medical treatises (1500–1700). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2(2): 235–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b. Using corpora to track changing thought styles: Evidentiality, epistemology, and early modern English and German scientific discourse. Kalbotyra 69: 265–291.Google Scholar
2016c. The Nottingham Corpus of Early Modern German Midwifery and Women's Medicine (ca. 1500–1700). Oxford: Oxford Text Archive. <[URL]> (17 July 2017).Google Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2011. ARCHER: Past and present (1990–2010). ICAME Journal 35: 205–236.Google Scholar