Part of
Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change
Edited by Richard J. Whitt
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 85] 2018
► pp. 195218
References
Aarts, Bas
1988Clauses of concession in written present-day British English. Journal of English Linguistics 21(1): 39–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agresti, Alan & Finlay, Barbara
2009Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark
2015– Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. [URL]Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
1989Théorie de l’argumentation, topoï, et structuration discursive. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 18(1): 13–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azar, Moshe
1997Concessive relations as argumentations. Text 17(3): 301–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Britain, David & Trudgill, Peter
2000Migration, dialect contact, new-dialect formation and reallocation. In Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe, Klaus J. Mattheier (ed.), 73–78. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Burnham, Josephine M.
1911Concessive Constructions in Old English Prose. New York NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Chen, Guohua
2000The grammaticalization of concessive markers in Early Modern English. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 87–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crevels, Mily
2000Concessives on different semantic levels: A typologocal perspective. In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 313–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2010– The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL]Google Scholar
Di Meola, Claudio
1998Zur Definition einer logisch-semantischen Kategorie: Konzessivität als „versteckte Kausalität“. Linguistische Berichte 175: 329–352.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kucera, Henry
1979Manual of Information to Accompany A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for Use with Digital Computers. Providence RI: Brown University Department of Linguistics. [URL] (27 February 2015).Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew
2012CQPweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(3): 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermodsson, Lars
1994Der Begriff „konzessiv”. Terminologie und Analysen. Studia Neophilologia 66: 59–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Gries, Stefan Th.
2009Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(4): 385–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol I: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D., & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
1999‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progess. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1985On the history of concessive connectives in English: Diachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua 66(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006Twentieth-Century English. History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra
2007The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
Oxford: OUP. [URL] (22 February 2017).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2016R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.4. [computer program]. [URL]Google Scholar
RStudio Team
2009–2015RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Version 0.99.486. Boston MA: RStudio. [URL]Google Scholar
Sarkar, Deepayan
2014lattice: Lattice Graphics. R-package version 0.20-29. [URL]Google Scholar
Schützler, Ole
2017A corpus-based study of concessive conjunctions in three L1-varieties of English. In Language Variation – European Perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, 2015 [Studies in Language Varietion 19], Isabelle Buchstaller & Beat Siebenhaar (eds), 173–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik
2014Syntactic stability and change in nineteenth-century newspaper language. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 311–29. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik & Kytö, Merja
2015English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In From Clerks to Corpora: Essays on the English Language Yesterday and Today, Philip Shaw, Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers & Peter Sundkvist (eds), 117–33. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2013Analysing aggregated linguistics data. In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds), 433–455. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1986Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Gast, Volker
2019. Chapter 6. A corpus-based comparative study of concessive connectives in English, German and Spanish. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Schützler, Ole
2019. Variation and change at the interface of syntax and semantics. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346],  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.