Chapter published in:
Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change
Edited by Richard J. Whitt
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 85] 2018
► pp. 195218
References

References

Aarts, Bas
1988Clauses of concession in written present-day British English. Journal of English Linguistics 21(1): 39–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Agresti, Alan & Finlay, Barbara
2009Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark
2015– Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. http://​www​.hansard​-corpus​.orgGoogle Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
1989Théorie de l’argumentation, topoï, et structuration discursive. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 18(1): 13–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Azar, Moshe
1997Concessive relations as argumentations. Text 17(3): 301–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Britain, David & Trudgill, Peter
2000Migration, dialect contact, new-dialect formation and reallocation. In Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe, Klaus J. Mattheier (ed.), 73–78. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Burnham, Josephine M.
1911Concessive Constructions in Old English Prose. New York NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Chen, Guohua
2000The grammaticalization of concessive markers in Early Modern English. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 87–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crevels, Mily
2000Concessives on different semantic levels: A typologocal perspective. In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 313–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2010– The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/Google Scholar
Di Meola, Claudio
1998Zur Definition einer logisch-semantischen Kategorie: Konzessivität als „versteckte Kausalität“. Linguistische Berichte 175: 329–352.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kucera, Henry
1979Manual of Information to Accompany A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for Use with Digital Computers. Providence RI: Brown University Department of Linguistics. http://​clu​.uni​.no​/icame​/manuals​/BROWN​/INDEX​.HTM (27 February 2015).Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew
2012CQPweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(3): 380–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hermodsson, Lars
1994Der Begriff „konzessiv”. Terminologie und Analysen. Studia Neophilologia 66: 59–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Gries, Stefan Th.
2009Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(4): 385–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol I: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D., & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian
1999‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progess. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1985On the history of concessive connectives in English: Diachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua 66(1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006Twentieth-Century English. History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra
2007The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2): 187–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oed​.com/ (22 February 2017).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2016R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.4. [computer program]. http://​www​.R​-project​.orgGoogle Scholar
RStudio Team
2009–2015RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Version 0.99.486. Boston MA: RStudio. http://​www​.rstudio​.com/Google Scholar
Sarkar, Deepayan
2014lattice: Lattice Graphics. R-package version 0.20-29. http://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/lattice​/lattice​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schützler, Ole
2017A corpus-based study of concessive conjunctions in three L1-varieties of English. In Language Variation – European Perspectives VI: Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8), Leipzig, 2015 [Studies in Language Varietion 19], Isabelle Buchstaller & Beat Siebenhaar (eds), 173–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik
2014Syntactic stability and change in nineteenth-century newspaper language. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 311–29. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik & Kytö, Merja
2015English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In From Clerks to Corpora: Essays on the English Language Yesterday and Today, Philip Shaw, Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers & Peter Sundkvist (eds), 117–33. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2013Analysing aggregated linguistics data. In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds), 433–455. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1986Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Gast, Volker
2019.  In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305],  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Schützler, Ole
2019.  In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346],  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.