Chapter 8
Observing Eurolects
The case of Greek
The present paper presents the findings from the analysis of the Greek corpus of European Union directives spanning the years 1999–2008 (corpus A) and the corpus of the legal instruments used to transpose them into Greek law (corpus B). The aim of the analysis is to verify the existence of a Greek Eurolect, born through translation, and to highlight the differences between this new legal variety and the corresponding Greek legal variety. The findings of the study are particularly interesting as they point to the existence of a Greek Eurolect characterised by Europeisms on a lexical level; morphosyntactic preferences which do not conform to the Greek legal language conventions and norms; an extensive use of the future tense as a result of translating English shall into Greek; and an oscillation between the use of Κatharevousa and Demotiki, that is an H-variety and an L-variety of the Greek language.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.EU law and EU legal language
- 3.Greek law and legal language
- 4.Corpus design and methodology
- 4.1Directives: Translation and transposition characteristics
- 4.1.1The translation of directives
- 4.1.2The transposition of directives
- 4.2Corpus A
- 4.3Corpus B
- 4.4Corpus analysis: A multi-method approach
- 4.5Levels of analysis
- 5.Corpora analysis and findings
- 5.1Qualitative analysis
- 5.1.1Interviews
- 5.1.2Qualitative corpus analysis
- 5.2Quantitative analysis and triangulation of results
- 5.2.1Analysis of EU-rooted phenomena
- 5.2.2Analysis of contact-induced features
- 5.2.3Analysis of intra-linguistic variability
- 5.2.4Triangulation of results and discussion
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (47)
Biel, Ł.
(
2014a)
Lost in the Eurofog. The textual fit of translated law. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biel, Ł.
(
2014b)
The textual fit of translated EU law: A corpus-based study of deontic modality.
The Translator, 20(2), 1–24.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biel, Ł., & Engberg, J.
(
2013)
Research models and methods in legal translation.
Linguistica Antverpiensia, 12, 1–11. Retrieved from
[URL] (17 October 2016).
Bowker, L. & Pearson, J.
(
2002)
Working with specialized language: A practical guide to using corpora. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caliendo, G., Di Martino, G., & Venuti, M.
(
2005)
Language and discourse features of EU secondary legislation. In
G. Cortese &
A. Duszak (Eds.),
Identity, community, discourse. English in intercultural settings (pp. 381–404). Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cao, D.
(
2007)
Translating law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
European Commission
nd.
DGT In-house Style Guide for Greek. Retrieved from
[URL] (17 October 2016).
Frangoudaki, A.
(
1993)
Γλώσσα και Ιδεολογία [
Language and ideology]. Athens: Odisseas.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garzone, G.
(
2000)
Legal translation and functionalist approaches: A contradiction in terms? In
Legal translation: History, theory/ies and practice. Proceedings of the International Colloquium, University of Geneva (pp. 395–414). Bern: ASTI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gombos, K.
(
2014)
EU law viewed through the eyes of a national judge. Retrieved from
[URL] (17 October 2016).
Hart, H. L. A.
(
1961)
The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harvey, M.
(
2002)
What’s so special about legal translation? Meta, 47(2), 177–185.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelsen, H.
(
2000)
Pure doctrine of law. Bucharest: Ed. Humanitas.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koskinen, K.
(
2008)
Translating institutions: An ethnographic study of EU translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koskinen, K.
(
2000)
Institutional illusions. Translating in the EU commission.
The Translator, 6(1), 49–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koutsivitis, V.
(
1991)
Quelques observations linguistiques concernant la version grecque des textes communautaires.
Terminologie et Traduction, 3, 245–253.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenz, M.
(
2006)
Grammatik und Stil: Das Passiv als stilistisches Mittel im Vergleich zu konkurrierenden grammatischen Konstruktionen (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Technical University Berlin. Retrieved from
[URL] (17 October 2016).
Marnell, G.
(
2016)
Essays on technical writing. Brighton, Victoria: Burdock Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mason, I.
(
2012)
Text parameters in translation: Transitivity and institutional cultures. In
L. Venuti (Ed.),
The translation studies reader (3rd ed.) (pp. 399–410). London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mattila, H. E. S.
(
2006)
Comparative legal linguistics (
C. Goddard, trans.). Aldershot: Ashgate.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matulewska, A.
(
2007)
Lingua legis in translation. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A.
(
1996)
Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: EUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mori, L.
(
2018)
Introduction.
The Eurolect Observatory Project
. In
L. Mori (Ed.),
Observing Eurolects. Corpus analysis of linguistic variation in EU law (
Studies in Corpus Linguistics 86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mori, L.
(
2011)
Linguistic variation in legal Maltese: EU directives compared to national implementation laws. In
S. Caruana,
R. Fabri &
T. Stolz (Eds.),
Variation and change: The dynamics of Maltese in space, time and society (pp. 109–127). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mori, L.
(
2008)
Gli anni Sessanta e la costruzione dell’identità linguistica europea. Sulla formazione della varietà comunitaria d’italiano. In
M. de Pasquale,
G. Dotoli &
M. Selvaggio (Eds.),
I linguaggi del sessantotto. Atti del Convegno multidisciplinare (pp. 531–544). Roma: Editrice Apes.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mori, L.
(
2005)
L’italiano lingua della legislazione europea. In
B. Turchetta,
L. Mori, &
R. Elisa (Eds.),
Il mondo in italiano. Varietà ed usi internazionali della lingua (pp. 73–106). Roma: Editori Laterza.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mori, L.
(
2003)
L’euroletto: Genesi e sviluppo dell’italiano comunitario. In
V. Ada,
P. Molinelli,
P. Cuzzolin &
G. Bernini (Eds.),
Ecologia linguistica. Atti del XXXVI Convegno internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (pp. 473–492). Roma: Bulzoni.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moser, A. & Panaretou, E.
Palmer, F. R.
(
2001)
Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panaretou, E.
(
2009)
Νομικός Λόγος: Γλώσσα και Δομή του Νόμου [
Legal language: Language and structure of the law]. Athens: Papazissis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pavlidou, T.
(
1991)
Linguistic nationalism and European unity: The case of Greece. In
F. Coulmas (Ed.),
A language policy for the European community. Prospects and quandaries (pp. 279–289). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piehl, A.
(
2006)
The influence of EU legislation on Finnish legal discourse. In
M. Gotti &
D. S. Giannoni (Eds.),
New trends in specialized discourse analysis, (pp. 183–194). Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H.
(
1992)
Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saldanha, G.
(
2009)
Principles of corpus linguistics and their application to translation studies research.
Revista Tradumàtica, 7. Retrieved from
[URL] (17 October 2016).
Šarčević, S.
(
1997)
New approach to legal translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sewell, P. M.
(
2001)
The occurrence of calque in translation scripts.
Meta, 46(3), 607–615.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Somssich, R., Várnal, J. & Bérczi, A.
(
2010)
Lawmaking in the EU multilingual environment. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate General for Translation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sosoni, V.
(
2012)
A hybrid translation theory for EU texts.
Vertimo Studijos, 5, 76–89.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sosoni, V.
(
2011)
Training translators to work for the EU institutions: Luxury or necessity? JoSTrans ‒ The Journal of Specialised Translation, 16, 77–108. Retrieved from
[URL] (10 October 2016).
Stephany, U.
(
2015)
Mood and modal verbs in the English, German, and Greek official versions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In
E. Miola &
P. Ramat (Eds.),
Language across languages: New perspectives on translation (pp. 123–142). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tirkkonen-Condit, S.
(
2001)
EU project proposals as hybrid texts: Observations from a Finnish research project.
Across Languages and Cultures, 2(2), 261–264.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tosi, A.
(
2005)
EU translation problems and the danger of linguistic evaluation.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 384–388.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valeontis, K. E. & Krimpas Panagiotis, G.
(
2014)
Νομική γλώσσα, νομική ορολογία: θεωρία και πράξη [Legal language, legal terminology: Theory and practice]. Athens: Nomiki Bibliothiki.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Els, T. J. M.
(
2001)
The European Union, its institutions and its languages: Some language political observations.
Current Issues in Language Planning, 2(4), 311–360.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, E., Bech, S., & Martínez, J. M.
(
2002)
Translating for the European Union institutions. Manchester: St. Jerome.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Mori, Laura & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
Kozobolis, Stavros
2020.
A corpus-based study on deontic modality in Competition Law: Insights from the English-Greek language pair.
Estudios de Traducción 10
► pp. 91 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.