Chapter published in:The Corpus Linguistics Discourse: In honour of Wolfgang Teubert
Edited by Anna Čermáková and Michaela Mahlberg
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 87] 2018
► pp. 77–94
Signposts to objectivity?
This chapter focuses on describing, illustrating and critiquing the keywords technique, which is used to automatically identify lexical salience when comparing multiple corpora. Arguably, keywords present researchers with words that they may not have chosen to analyse in advance, thus helping to reduce researcher subjectivity. I illustrate how the identification of keywords enables researchers to embark on interesting research journeys, through examples taken from an analysis of the representation of Islam and Muslims in a corpus of British newspaper articles. However, when using large corpora, even with high cut-off points for statistical salience, hundreds of keywords may be produced, meaning that researchers need to make decisions regarding which words are worthy of detailed focus. The chapter ends with an illustrative analysis where I revisit six of my own keyword studies, arguing that researchers should consider the benefits of giving a more reflexive account of their own decision making procedures around keywords.
Published online: 06 December 2018
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, G. & McEnery, T.
Baker, P. & Love, R.
Gabrielatos, C. & Baker, P.
Gabrielatos, C. & Marchi, A.
2012 Keyness: Appropriate metrics and practical issues. Paper presented at CADS International Conference 2012, 13–14 September, University of Bologna Italy.
2014 Statistical identification of keywords, lockwords and collocations as a two step procedure. Paper presented at ICAME 35 Conference 30 April – 4 May, University of Nottingham.
Marchi, A. & Taylor, C.
2013 Experimenting with objectivity in corpus and discourse studies: Expectations about LGBT discourse and a game of mutual falsification and reflexivity. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics Conference July 23, 2013, Lancaster University.
Partington, A., Duguid, A. & Taylor, C.