Cover not available
Part of
Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes
Edited by Alexandra U. Esimaje, Ulrike Gut and Bassey E. Antia
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 88] 2019
► pp. 165–182

Chapter 1.7
Practical corpus linguistics

Designing and exploiting a written corpus for research with special reference to Cameroon English

| University of Yaoundé I
One major contribution of the corpus-based approach to language study is the facility with which linguists can access large amounts of data and search for regularities across text types and varieties of English on the basis of observed frequencies. Such regularities of features, if based on well-designed and/or specialised corpora, can be useful for classroom activities and material design. This chapter describes the basic steps involved in corpus design and corpus exploitation. Section 1 defines the corpus and briefly states the relevance of investigating English second language (ESL) varieties via a corpus. Section 2 describes key steps involved in simple corpus compilation and how students can compile their own corpora for research. Section 3 presents results of two studies on the frequency and use of modals in the corpus of Cameroonian English. These results are intended to illustrate the point that the corpus approach is indispensable if certain types of linguistic information are investigated in a particular variety.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Aim
    • 1.2Why is corpus linguistics relevant for ESL varieties?
  • 2.Compilation of the CCE
    • 2.1Initial considerations
    • 2.2Design parameters
  • 3.Some findings on the use of modals in CamE
    • 3.1‘Must’, ‘should’, ‘ought’ and ‘need’ in CamE
      • ‘must’
      • Root
      • Epistemic
      • ‘should’
    • 3.2Frequencies and common senses of the modals
  • 4.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.88.08nke
References (35)
References
Akere, Funso. 1996. The Nigerian Corpus of English Project: A survey of Nigerian English usage. In English in Ghana: Proceedings of the Inaugural Meeting of Ghana English Association, held at the University College of Education, Winneba, June 13–15, Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu (ed.), 115–125.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer & Leech, Geoffrey. 1980. The meanings of the modals in modern British and American English. York Papers in Linguistics 8: 23–24.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 1988. The semantics of some modals in contemporary Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 237–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English. In English Corpus Linguistics, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 145–165. London: Longman.Google Scholar
De Klerk, Vivian. 2002. Toward a corpus of Black South African English. South African Journal of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 20(1): 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esimaje, Alexandra. 2016. A corpus-based study of tense use by advanced learners of English in Nigeria. In Academic Writing Across Disciplines in Africa: From Students to Experts, Josef Schmied & Daniel A. Nkemleke (eds), 33–146. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2017. Comparing spelling usage by advanced learners in Nigeria and Cameroon: A Conacell-based study. Review Syllabus Vol. 7(1): 161–183.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sydney. 1988. A proposal for an international computerized corpus of English. World Englishes 7: 315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1994. International Corpus of English Project Newsletter 18. World Englishes 7: 315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haliday, Michael A. K. 1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundation of Language 6: 322–361.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1990. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions, and Models of Non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Katikar, Pratibha B. 1994. The Meaning of the Modals in Indian English. PhD dissertation, Shivaji University, Kolhapur.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1971. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1980. The meaning of the modals in modern British and American English. York Papers in Linguistics 8: 23–34.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nkemleke, Daniel. 2003. A Corpus-based Study of the Modal Verbs in Cameroonian English. PhD dissertation, University of Yaoundé 1.Google Scholar
. 2008. Manual of Information to Accompany the Corpus of Cameroon English. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology, Department of English.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1974. The English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1979. Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Platt, John, H. Webber & M. Ho (1984). The New Englishes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1961. The survey of English usage. The Linguistic Reporter 3(2): 3–7.Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette. 1987. Corpus development at Birmingham University. In Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD PROJECT in Lexical Computing, John M. Sinclair (ed.), 1–40. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef. 1989. Conference report: Compiling a corpus of East African English. ICAME Journal 13: 75–77.Google Scholar
. 1999. Applying contrastive corpora in modern contrastive grammars: The Chemnitz Internet Grammar of English. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, Hilde Hasselgard & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 21–30. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 1990. Corpus linguistics and non-native varieties of English. World Englishes 9(3): 255–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1982. Reflection on computer corpora in English language research. In Computer in English Language Research, Stig Johansson (ed.), 243–252. Bergen: Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. & Wright, D. 1977. The use of ought in Teenage English. In Acceptability in Language, Sidney Greenbaum (ed.), 179–201. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tiomajou, David. 1993. Designing the Corpus of Cameroon English. ICAME Journal 17: 119–124.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Hannah, Jean. 1982. International English: A Guide to Varieties of Standard English. New York NY: Routledge Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Wells, Gordon. 1979. Learning and using the auxiliary verb in English. In Language Development, Victor Lee (ed.). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Von Wright, Georg H. 1951. An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Schmied, Josef J.
2019. Chapter 3.2. African corpora for standards in African academic English. In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88], ► pp. 356 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.