This chapter provides a diachronic corpus-based analysis of a vitally important, yet currently very under-researched, legal genre: the patent specification. The empirical focus of the analysis is on changes in the rhetorical move structure of the patent specification genre over the first 150 years of its existence, as represented by a corpus of British patent specification texts ranging from 1711 to 1860. The methodology of the study involves reducing each exemplar text in the corpus to a simple letter code string representing its rhetorical move structure, and then submitting the resulting list of code strings to two kinds of computational analysis: one focusing on the frequency and distribution of individual rhetorical moves over the period of the study, and the other focusing on the frequency and distribution of the different move sequence types attested in the corpus. It is argued that the findings of the study are consistent with, and may thus be interpreted as providing empirical support for, generalized evolutionary theoretical models of genre change.
2008Darwinian evolutionary theory and the social sciences. Twenty-First Century Society 3(1): 65–86.
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E. & Reidy, Michael S.
2002Communicating Science. The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: OUP.
Hairston, Nelson G. Jr., Ellner, Stephen, Geber, Monica A., Yoshida, Takehito & Fox, Jennifer A.
2005Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters 8: 1114–1127.
Hendry, Andrew P. & Kinnison, Michael T.
1999Perspective: The pace of modern life: Measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53: 1637–1653.
Henrich, Joseph & McElreath, Richard
2003The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 123–135.
Hull, David L.
1988Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
2002Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 113–135.
2008Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching 41(4): 543–562.
2007From Helsinki through the centuries: The design and development of English diachronic corpora. In Towards Multimedia in Corpus Studies [Studies in Variation, Contact and Change in English 2], Päivi Pahta, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL]
2009Historical corpus pragmatics: Focus on speech acts and texts. In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research in Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 13–36. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kwan, Becky S. C.
2006The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25: 30–55.
Li, Li-Juan & Ge, Guang-Chun
2009Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes 28(2): 93–104.
1988Inventing the Industrial Revolution. The English Patent System, 1660–1800. Cambridge: CUP.
Martin, J. R.
2005 Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 3rd edn, Frances Christie & James R. Martin (eds), 3–39. London: Continuum.
2011Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mesoudi, Alex, Whiten, Andrew & Laland, Kevin N.
2004Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species. Evolution 58: 1–11.
Miller, Carolyn R.
1984Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–176.
Miller, Carolyn R.
2016Genre innovation: Evolution, emergence, or something else?The Journal of Media Innovations 3(2): 4–19.
Miller, Carolyn R. & Shepherd, Dawn
2004Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In Laura Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff & Jessica Reymann (eds), Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and the Culture of Weblogs. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. [URL]
2018Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes 50(1): 40–63.
1995From discovery to invention: The writing and rewriting of two patents. Social Studies of Science 25: 57–105.
2001A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys 33(1): 31–88.
Nwogu, Kevin Ngozu
1997The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 119–138.
1994Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics 15(3): 288–299.
Paltridge, Brian & Starfield, Sue
(eds)2013The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
R. Core Team
2017R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Richerson, Peter J. & Christiansen, Morten H.
(eds)2013Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2000The world of English historical corpora: From Cædmon to the computer age. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1): 7–20.
1992A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 11(2): 93–113.
2014Move structure. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 385–406. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Samraj, Betty & Gawron, Jean Mark
2015The suicide note as a genre: Implications for genre theory. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19: 88–101.
Smitterberg, Erik & Kytö, Merja
2015English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In From Clerks to Corpora: Essays on the English Language Yesterday and Today, Philip Shaw, Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers & Peter Sundkvist (eds), 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Stuart, Yoel E., Campbell, Todd S., Hohenlohe, Paul A., Reynolds, Robert G., Revell, Liam J. & Losos, Jonathan B.
2014Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener. Science 346, Issue 6208 (Oct. 24): 463–466.
Swales, John M.
1981Aspects of Article Introductions [Aston ESP Research Reports 1]. Birmingham: University of Aston.
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.
Swales, John M.
2004Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: CUP.
2016Genre dynamics in the history of English. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds), 271–285. Cambridge: CUP.
Tardy, Christine M. & Swales, John M.
2014Genre analysis. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 165–187. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Thompson, John N.
1998Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13(8): 329–332.
Upton, Thomas A. & Cohen, Mary Ann
2009An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as an example. Discourse Studies 11(5): 585–605.
Upton, Thomas A. & Connor, Ulla
2001Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes 20(4): 313–329.
van Dulken, Stephen
1999British Patents of Invention, 1617–1977: A Guide for Researchers. London: The British Library.
Yang, Ruiying & Allison, Desmond
2003Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22(4): 365–385.
Yoshida, Takehito, Jones, Laura E., Ellner, Stephen P., Fussmann, Gregor F. & Hairston, Nelson G.
2003Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system. Nature 424(6946): 303–306.
Cited by 7 other publications
2020. Move Analysis of Legal Justifications in Constitutional Tribunal Judgments in Poland: What They Share and What They Do Not. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 33:3 ► pp. 581 ff.
2021. Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:5 ► pp. 1515 ff.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Julia Mazurkiewicz-Sułkowska
2023. The status of generic structure in expert opinions. Insights from a comparative analysis of American, Russian and Bulgarian documents. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 13:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
2022. Situational diversity and linguistic complexity. Linguistics Vanguard 0:0
Jürine, Anni, Djuddah Leijen, Helen Hint, Jolanta Sinkuniene, Diāna Laiveniece, Christer Johansson & Nicholas Groom
2021. Academic Writing in the Baltic States. Educare :1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula & David Hernández-Coalla
2023. The Corpus of Contemporary English Legal Decisions, 1950–2021 (CoCELD): A new tool for analysing recent changes in English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 47:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.