Part of
Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse
Edited by Teresa Fanego and Paula Rodríguez-Puente
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91] 2019
► pp. 201234
Ayers, Gael
2008The evolutionary nature of genre: An investigation of the short texts accompanying research articles in the scientific journal “Nature”. English for Specific Purposes 27: 22–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1988Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
1994Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Genre and the New Rhetoric, Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds), 79–101. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
1999The Languages of Edison’s Light. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bawarshi, Anis S. & Reiff, Mary Jo
2010Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research and Pedagogy. West Lafayette IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol
2009Patient Tales: Case Histories and the Uses of Narrative in Psychiatry. Columbia SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol & Huckin, Thomas N.
1995Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2004Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biagioli, Mario
2006Patent republic: Representing inventions, constructing rights and authors. Social Research 73(4): 1129–1172.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
2009Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Connor, Ulla & Upton, Thomas A.
2007Discourse on the Move. Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bottomley, Sean
2014aThe British Patent System during the Industrial Revolution 1700–1852: From Privilege to Property. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014bPatenting in England, Scotland and Ireland during the Industrial Revolution, 1700–1852. Explorations in Economic History 54: 48–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunton, David
2005The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(3): 207–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, Ulla & Upton, Thomas A.
2004The Genre of Grant Proposals: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis. In Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 16], Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 235–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard
1986The Blind Watchmaker. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C.
1995Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Devitt, Amy J.
2004Writing Genres. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, Harry I.
1984The Patent System and Inventive Activity during the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1852. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Farley, Peter C.
2017Genre analysis of decision letters from editors of scientific journals: Building on Flowerdew and Dudley-Evans (2002). Applied Linguistics 38(6): 896–905.Google Scholar
Fisher, Matthew
2007Fundamentals of Patent Law. Interpretation and Scope of Protection. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana, Catenaccio, Paola & Degano, Chiara
(eds) 2012Genre Change in the Contemporary World: Short-term Diachronic Perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Swanne P., Reznick, David N., Kinnison, Michael T., Bryant, Michael J., Weese, Dylan J., Räsänen, Katja, Millar, Nathan P. & Hendry, Andrew P.
2009Adaptive changes in life history and survival following a new guppy introduction. The American Naturalist 174(1): 34–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gough, Ian, Runciman, Garry, Mace, Ruth, Hodgson, Geoffrey & Rustin, Michael
2008Darwinian evolutionary theory and the social sciences. Twenty-First Century Society 3(1): 65–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E. & Reidy, Michael S.
2002Communicating Science. The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hairston, Nelson G. Jr., Ellner, Stephen, Geber, Monica A., Yoshida, Takehito & Fox, Jennifer A.
2005Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters 8: 1114–1127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendry, Andrew P. & Kinnison, Michael T.
1999Perspective: The pace of modern life: Measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53: 1637–1653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph & McElreath, Richard
2003The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 123–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L.
1988Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2002Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 113–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching 41(4): 543–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
2007From Helsinki through the centuries: The design and development of English diachronic corpora. In Towards Multimedia in Corpus Studies [ Studies in Variation, Contact and Change in English 2], Päivi Pahta, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL] Google Scholar
2009Historical corpus pragmatics: Focus on speech acts and texts. In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research in Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 13–36. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kwan, Becky S. C.
2006The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25: 30–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Li-Juan & Ge, Guang-Chun
2009Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes 28(2): 93–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Christine
1988Inventing the Industrial Revolution. The English Patent System, 1660–1800. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
2005[1997] Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 3rd edn, Frances Christie & James R. Martin (eds), 3–39. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex
2011Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex, Whiten, Andrew & Laland, Kevin N.
2004Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species . Evolution 58: 1–11.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R.
1984Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Genre innovation: Evolution, emergence, or something else? The Journal of Media Innovations 3(2): 4–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. & Shepherd, Dawn
2004Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In Laura Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff & Jessica Reymann (eds), Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and the Culture of Weblogs. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. [URL] Google Scholar
2009Questions for genre theory from the blogosphere. In Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 188], Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds), 263–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno, Ana I. & Swales, John M.
2018Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes 50(1): 40–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
1995From discovery to invention: The writing and rewriting of two patents. Social Studies of Science 25: 57–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro, Gonzalo
2001A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys 33(1): 31–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin Ngozu
1997The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 119–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian
1994Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics 15(3): 288–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian & Starfield, Sue
(eds) 2013The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
R. Core Team
2017R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL] Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J. & Christiansen, Morten H.
(eds) 2013Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
2000The world of English historical corpora: From Cædmon to the computer age. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1): 7–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1992A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 11(2): 93–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samraj, Betty
2014Move structure. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 385–406. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samraj, Betty & Gawron, Jean Mark
2015The suicide note as a genre: Implications for genre theory. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19: 88–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik & Kytö, Merja
2015English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In From Clerks to Corpora: Essays on the English Language Yesterday and Today, Philip Shaw, Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers & Peter Sundkvist (eds), 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Yoel E., Campbell, Todd S., Hohenlohe, Paul A., Reynolds, Robert G., Revell, Liam J. & Losos, Jonathan B.
2014Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener. Science 346, Issue 6208 (Oct. 24): 463–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1981Aspects of Article Introductions [Aston ESP Research Reports 1]. Birmingham: University of Aston.Google Scholar
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2016Genre dynamics in the history of English. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds), 271–285. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, Christine M. & Swales, John M.
2014Genre analysis. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 165–187. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John N.
1998Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13(8): 329–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Upton, Thomas A. & Cohen, Mary Ann
2009An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as an example. Discourse Studies 11(5): 585–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Upton, Thomas A. & Connor, Ulla
2001Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes 20(4): 313–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dulken, Stephen
1999British Patents of Invention, 1617–1977: A Guide for Researchers. London: The British Library.Google Scholar
Yang, Ruiying & Allison, Desmond
2003Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22(4): 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, Takehito, Jones, Laura E., Ellner, Stephen P., Fussmann, Gregor F. & Hairston, Nelson G.
2003Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system. Nature 424(6946): 303–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw
2020. Move Analysis of Legal Justifications in Constitutional Tribunal Judgments in Poland: What They Share and What They Do Not. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 33:3  pp. 581 ff. DOI logo
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2021. Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:5  pp. 1515 ff. DOI logo
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Julia Mazurkiewicz-Sułkowska
2023. The status of generic structure in expert opinions. Insights from a comparative analysis of American, Russian and Bulgarian documents. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 13:2  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Grieve, Jack
2022. Situational diversity and linguistic complexity. Linguistics Vanguard 0:0 DOI logo
Groom, Nicholas
2019. Construction Grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Jürine, Anni, Djuddah Leijen, Helen Hint, Jolanta Sinkuniene, Diāna Laiveniece, Christer Johansson & Nicholas Groom
2021. Academic Writing in the Baltic States. Educare :1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula & David Hernández-Coalla
2023. The Corpus of Contemporary English Legal Decisions, 1950–2021 (CoCELD): A new tool for analysing recent changes in English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 47:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.