This chapter provides a diachronic corpus-based analysis of a vitally important, yet currently very under-researched, legal genre: the patent specification. The empirical focus of the analysis is on changes in the rhetorical move structure of the patent specification genre over the first 150 years of its existence, as represented by a corpus of British patent specification texts ranging from 1711 to 1860. The methodology of the study involves reducing each exemplar text in the corpus to a simple letter code string representing its rhetorical move structure, and then submitting the resulting list of code strings to two kinds of computational analysis: one focusing on the frequency and distribution of individual rhetorical moves over the period of the study, and the other focusing on the frequency and distribution of the different move sequence types attested in the corpus. It is argued that the findings of the study are consistent with, and may thus be interpreted as providing empirical support for, generalized evolutionary theoretical models of genre change.
Ayers, Gael. 2008. The evolutionary nature of genre: An investigation of the short texts accompanying research articles in the scientific journal “Nature”. English for Specific Purposes 27: 22–41.
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, Charles. 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Genre and the New Rhetoric, Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds), 79–101. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bazerman, Charles. 1999. The Languages of Edison’s Light. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Bawarshi, Anis S. & Reiff, Mary Jo. 2010. Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research and Pedagogy. West Lafayette IN: Parlor Press.
Berkenkotter, Carol. 2009. Patient Tales: Case Histories and the Uses of Narrative in Psychiatry. Columbia SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Berkenkotter, Carol & Huckin, Thomas N.1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bhatia, Vijay K.1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Bhatia, Vijay K.2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.
Biagioli, Mario. 2006. Patent republic: Representing inventions, constructing rights and authors. Social Research 73(4): 1129–1172.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: CUP.
Bottomley, Sean. 2014a. The British Patent System during the Industrial Revolution 1700–1852: From Privilege to Property. Cambridge: CUP.
Bottomley, Sean. 2014b. Patenting in England, Scotland and Ireland during the Industrial Revolution, 1700–1852. Explorations in Economic History 54: 48–63.
Bunton, David. 2005. The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(3): 207–224.
Connor, Ulla & Upton, Thomas A.2004. The Genre of Grant Proposals: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis. In Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 16], Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds), 235–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Dawkins, Richard. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. London: Longman.
Dennett, Daniel C.1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York NY: Simon & Schuster.
Dutton, Harry I.1984. The Patent System and Inventive Activity during the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1852. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Farley, Peter C.2017. Genre analysis of decision letters from editors of scientific journals: Building on Flowerdew and Dudley-Evans (2002). Applied Linguistics 38(6): 896–905.
Fisher, Matthew. 2007. Fundamentals of Patent Law. Interpretation and Scope of Protection. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Garzone, Giuliana, Catenaccio, Paola & Degano, Chiara (eds). 2012. Genre Change in the Contemporary World: Short-term Diachronic Perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang.
Gordon, Swanne P., Reznick, David N., Kinnison, Michael T., Bryant, Michael J., Weese, Dylan J., Räsänen, Katja, Millar, Nathan P. & Hendry, Andrew P.2009. Adaptive changes in life history and survival following a new guppy introduction. The American Naturalist 174(1): 34–45.
Gough, Ian, Runciman, Garry, Mace, Ruth, Hodgson, Geoffrey & Rustin, Michael. 2008. Darwinian evolutionary theory and the social sciences. Twenty-First Century Society 3(1): 65–86.
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E. & Reidy, Michael S.2002. Communicating Science. The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: OUP.
Hairston, Nelson G. Jr., Ellner, Stephen, Geber, Monica A., Yoshida, Takehito & Fox, Jennifer A.2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters 8: 1114–1127.
Hendry, Andrew P. & Kinnison, Michael T.1999. Perspective: The pace of modern life: Measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53: 1637–1653.
Henrich, Joseph & McElreath, Richard. 2003. The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 123–135.
Hull, David L.1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hyland, Ken. 2002. Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 113–135.
Hyland, Ken. 2008. Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching 41(4): 543–562.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. From Helsinki through the centuries: The design and development of English diachronic corpora. In Towards Multimedia in Corpus Studies [Studies in Variation, Contact and Change in English 2], Päivi Pahta, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. <[URL]>
Kohnen, Thomas. 2009. Historical corpus pragmatics: Focus on speech acts and texts. In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research in Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 13–36. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kwan, Becky S. C.2006. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25: 30–55.
Li, Li-Juan & Ge, Guang-Chun. 2009. Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes 28(2): 93–104.
MacLeod, Christine. 1988. Inventing the Industrial Revolution. The English Patent System, 1660–1800. Cambridge: CUP.
Martin, J. R.2005[1997]. Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 3rd edn, Frances Christie & James R. Martin (eds), 3–39. London: Continuum.
Mesoudi, Alex. 2011. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mesoudi, Alex, Whiten, Andrew & Laland, Kevin N.2004. Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species. Evolution 58: 1–11.
Miller, Carolyn R.1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–176.
Miller, Carolyn R.2016. Genre innovation: Evolution, emergence, or something else?The Journal of Media Innovations 3(2): 4–19.
Miller, Carolyn R. & Shepherd, Dawn. 2004. Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In Laura Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff & Jessica Reymann (eds), Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and the Culture of Weblogs. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. <[URL]>
Miller, Carolyn R. & Shepherd, Dawn. 2009. Questions for genre theory from the blogosphere. In Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 188], Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds), 263–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moreno, Ana I. & Swales, John M.2018. Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes 50(1): 40–63.
Myers, Greg. 1995. From discovery to invention: The writing and rewriting of two patents. Social Studies of Science 25: 57–105.
Navarro, Gonzalo. 2001. A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys 33(1): 31–88.
Nwogu, Kevin Ngozu. 1997. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 119–138.
Paltridge, Brian. 1994. Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics 15(3): 288–299.
Paltridge, Brian & Starfield, Sue. (eds). 2013. The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <[URL]>
Richerson, Peter J. & Christiansen, Morten H. (eds). 2013. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Rissanen, Matti. 2000. The world of English historical corpora: From Cædmon to the computer age. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1): 7–20.
Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1992. A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 11(2): 93–113.
Samraj, Betty. 2014. Move structure. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 385–406. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Samraj, Betty & Gawron, Jean Mark. 2015. The suicide note as a genre: Implications for genre theory. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19: 88–101.
Smitterberg, Erik & Kytö, Merja. 2015. English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In From Clerks to Corpora: Essays on the English Language Yesterday and Today, Philip Shaw, Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers & Peter Sundkvist (eds), 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Stuart, Yoel E., Campbell, Todd S., Hohenlohe, Paul A., Reynolds, Robert G., Revell, Liam J. & Losos, Jonathan B.2014. Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener. Science 346, Issue 6208 (Oct. 24): 463–466.
Swales, John M.1981. Aspects of Article Introductions [Aston ESP Research Reports 1]. Birmingham: University of Aston.
Swales, John M.1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.
Swales, John M.2004. Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: CUP.
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds), 271–285. Cambridge: CUP.
Tardy, Christine M. & Swales, John M.2014. Genre analysis. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 165–187. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Thompson, John N.1998. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13(8): 329–332.
Upton, Thomas A. & Cohen, Mary Ann. 2009. An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as an example. Discourse Studies 11(5): 585–605.
Upton, Thomas A. & Connor, Ulla. 2001. Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes 20(4): 313–329.
van Dulken, Stephen. 1999. British Patents of Invention, 1617–1977: A Guide for Researchers. London: The British Library.
Yang, Ruiying & Allison, Desmond. 2003. Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22(4): 365–385.
Yoshida, Takehito, Jones, Laura E., Ellner, Stephen P., Fussmann, Gregor F. & Hairston, Nelson G.2003. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system. Nature 424(6946): 303–306.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Julia Mazurkiewicz-Sułkowska
2023. The status of generic structure in expert opinions. Insights from a comparative analysis of American, Russian and Bulgarian documents. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 13:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Grieve, Jack
2023. Situational diversity and linguistic complexity. Linguistics Vanguard 9:s1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula & David Hernández-Coalla
2023. The Corpus of Contemporary English Legal Decisions, 1950–2021 (CoCELD): A new tool for analysing recent changes in English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 47:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2021. Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:5 ► pp. 1515 ff.
Jürine, Anni, Djuddah Leijen, Helen Hint, Jolanta Sinkuniene, Diāna Laiveniece, Christer Johansson & Nicholas Groom
2021. Academic Writing in the Baltic States. Educare :1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw
2020. Move Analysis of Legal Justifications in Constitutional Tribunal Judgments in Poland: What They Share and What They Do Not. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 33:3 ► pp. 581 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.