Chapter published in:
Learner Corpora and Language Teaching
Edited by Sandra Götz and Joybrato Mukherjee
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92] 2019
► pp. 191217
References

References

Aguilar, Lourdes, de-la-Mota, Carme & Prieto, Pilar
Altenberg, Bengt
1987Prosodic Patterns in Spoken English: Studies in the Correlation between Prosody and Grammar for Text-to-speech Conversation. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Backman, Nancy
1979Intonation errors in second-language pronunciation of eight Spanish-speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4: 239–265.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne
2002Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning how to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 108]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Ayers Elam, Gayle
1997Guidelines for ToBI Labelling, version 3. The Ohio State University Research Foundation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet
1986Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernardini, Silvia
2004Corpora in the classroom: an overview and some reflections on future developments. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John Sinclair (ed.), 15–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Best, Catherine T.
1995A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Winifred Strange (ed.), 171–204. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2015Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. (Version: 5.3.69). [Computer Software]. http://​www​.fon​.hum​.uva​.nl​/praat/ (15 March 2015).
Brand, Christiane & Kämmerer, Susanne
2006The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI): Compiling the German component. In Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy. New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, Sabine Braun, Kurt Kohn & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 127–140. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian
1977Listening to Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Canepàri, Luciano
2010The Pronunciation of English around the World: Geo-Social Applications of the Natural Phonetics & Tonetics Method. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2005A Handbook of Phonetics. Natural Phonetics: Articulatory, Auditory & Functional. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, Catia, Strik, Helmer & Boves, Lou
2002Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2862–2873. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Sylvie
2004Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (BELL) New Series 2: 225–246.Google Scholar
Diáz-Campos, Manuel
2004Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2): 249–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Draxler, Christoph
2008Korpusbasierte Sprachverarbeitung: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Esser, Jürgen
1992Englische Prosodie: Eine Einführung, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1978Contrastive intonation of German and English. Phonetica 35: 41–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E.
1995Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Winifred Strange (ed.), 233–277. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony
1984German Intonation: An Outline. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1981Fall-rise intonations in German and English. In Contrastive aspects of English and German, Charles V. J. Russ (ed.), 55–72. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Freed, Barbara F.
1995What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context [Studies in Bilingualism 9], Barbara F. Freed (ed.), 123–148. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Christoph, Meisenburg, Trudel & Selig, Maria
2013Spanisch: Phonetik und Phonologie. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie & Granger, Sylviane
(eds) 2010LINDSEI: Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage, handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Götz, Dieter
1986Intonation an der Hochschule. Die Neuen Sprachen 85 (5–6): 465–477.Google Scholar
Götz, Sandra & Mukherjee Joybrato
2018The effect of the study abroad variable in spoken learner language: A pseudo-longitudinal study on spoken German learner English. In Learner Corpus Research: New Perspectives and Applications, Vaclav Brezina & Lynne Flowerdew (eds), 47–65. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther
1998Comparative Intonational Phonology: English and German. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Intonation: Theory, Models, and Applications. Athens, Greece, 157–160.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Post, Brechtje, Nolan, Francis & Farrar, Kimberley
2000Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 28: 161–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
1996From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Languages in Contrast: Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer, Bengt Altenberg & Mats Johansson (eds), 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
2015Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux Estelle & Meunier, Fanny
2002International Corpus of Learner English. Louvain: UCL.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux, Estelle, Meunier, Fanny & Paquot, Magali
(eds) 2009International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2, handbook + CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine & Bauman, Stefan
2007An introduction to intonation – Functions and models. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 25–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2009Statistics for Linguistics with R. Trends in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grover, Cynthia, Jamieson, Donald G. & Dobrovolsky, Michael B.
1987Intonation in English, French and German: Perception and production. Language and Speech 30: 277–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Non-Native Speech: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Phonological and Phonetic Properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Learner corpora in second language prosody research and teaching. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 145–167. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gut, Ulrike, Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J.
2007Bridging research on phonetic descriptions with knowledge from teaching practice – The case of prosody in non-native speech. In Non-Native Prosody, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 3–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, Ulla & Trouvain, Jürgen
2007Teaching prosody in German as foreign language. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 171–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Ulla
2003Phonologie und Phonetik in Deutsch als Fremdsprache. In Deutsch als Fremdsprache: Wissenschaftsanspruch – Teilbereiche – Bezugsdisziplinen, Claus Altmayer & Roland Forster (eds), 189–233. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel, De Looze, Céline, Auran, Cyril, & Bouzon, Caroline
Hothorn, Torsten & Zeileis, Achim
2015partykit: A Modular Toolkit for Recursive Partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16: 3905–3909. http://​jmlr​.org​/papers​/v16​/hothorn15a​.html (12 January 2016).
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt & Zeileis, Achim
2006Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3): 651–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José I.
2005The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance Languages: Overview and Status Quaestionis. In Romance Phonology and Variation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 217], Caroline Wiltshire & Joaquim Camps (eds), 101–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenner, Bryan R. A.
1976Interlanguage and foreign accent. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 1: 166–195.Google Scholar
Jilka, Matthias
2007Different manifestations and perceptions of foreign accent in intonation. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2000The Contribution of Intonation to the Perception of Foreign Accent. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Johns, Tim
1994From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar, Terence Odlin (ed.), 27–45. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
1981Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Keller-Cohen, Deborah
1979Systematicity and variation in the non-native child’s acquisition of conversational skills. Language Learning 29: 27–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive
1997The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13: 301–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1966The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lado, Robert
1957Linguistics across Cultures. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lafford, Barbara A.
2004The effect of the context of learning on the use of communication strategies by learners of Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2): 201–25.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1997Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In Teaching and Language Corpora, Anne Wichmann, Steven Fligelstone, Tony McEnery & Gerald Knowles (eds), 1–23. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Li, Aike & Post, Brechtje
2014L2 Acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm – Evidence from L1 Mandarin and German Learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(2): 223–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loveday, Leo J.
1982The Sociolinguistics of Learning and Using a Non-Native Language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, Grit
2007Individual pronunciation coaching and prosody. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 211–236. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke & de Leeuw, Esther
2014Beyond segments: Prosody in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36: 183–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, Ineke
2007Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 53–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics 32: 543–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Schaeffler, Felix & Dickie, Catherine
2014Second language acquisition of pitch range in German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36: 303–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Missaglia, Federica
2007Prosodic training for adult Italian learners of German: The Contrastive Prosody Method. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 237–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mora, Joan C. & Valls-Ferrer, Margalida
2012Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly 46(4): 610–41.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2001Form und Funktion prosodisch-syntaktischer Präsentationsstrukturen im gesprochenen Englisch. PhD dissertation, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
2002Korpuslinguistik und Englischunterricht: Eine Einführung. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009Anglistische Korpuslinguistik: Eine Einführung. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1992Intonation and discourse type. Text 12: 397–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, Terence
1989Language transfer: cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual
2010The death of the adverb revisited: Attested uses of adverbs in native and non-native comparable corpora of spoken English. In Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy. Lexis and Corpus-Based Language Teaching, Maria Moreno Jaén, Fernando Serrano Valverde & Maria Calzada Pérez (eds), 157–172. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pickering, Lucy
2004The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes 23: 19–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Puga, Karin
. In progress. English Prosody of Advanced Learners: A Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis with Language-pedagogical Implications. PhD dissertation, University of Giessen.
Pürschel, Heiner
1975Pause und Kadenz: Interferenzerscheinungen bei der englischen Intonation deutscher Sprecher. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2015R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Version 3.2.3 https://​www​.R​-project​.org/ (5 January 2016).
Raith, Joachim
1986Prosodie: Englisch als Fremdsprache, Deutsch als Basissprache. Die Neueren Sprachen 85: 478–496.Google Scholar
Ramírez Verdugo, Dolores
2002Non-native interlanguage intonation systems: A study based on a computerized corpus of Spanish learners of English. ICAME Journal 26: 115–132.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter J.
2009 [1991]English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rogers, Henry
2000The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia
2016Cuppa coffee? Challenges and opportunities of compiling a conversational English corpus in an Expanding Circle setting. In Selected Contributions from the Methods and Linguistic Theories Symposium A Blend of MaLT 2015, Hanna Christ, Daniel Klenovšak, Lukas Sönning & Valentin Werner (eds), 49–71. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Scuffil, Michael
1982Experiments in Comparative Intonation: A Case-Study of English and German. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary E., Pitrelli, John F., Ostendorf, Maria, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia
1992ToBI: A standard scheme for labeling prosody. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, 867–879.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
(ed.) 1990The London Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English 82]. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Towell, Richard
2002Relative degrees of fluency. A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 40(2): 117–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, Pavel & Baker, Wendy
2007Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics 28: 251–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Els, Theo & de Bot, Kees
1987The role of intonation in foreign accent. Modern Language journal 71: 147–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C.
2006English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Willems, Nico
1982English Intonation from a Dutch Point of View. Ambach: Intercontinental Graphics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa
1976Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5(2): 189–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, Magdalena
2007Metacompetence-based approach to the teaching of L2 prosody: practical implications. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürge Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 189–209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar