Chapter published in:
In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language: A corpus-driven approach
Edited by Shlomo Izre'el, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi and Tommaso Raso
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 94] 2020
► pp. 337348
References

References

Amir, N., Silber-Varod, V., & Izre’el, S.
(2004) Characteristics of intonation unit boundaries in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Perception and acoustic correlates. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Speech prosody 2004 (pp. 677–680). Nara, Japan: ISCA.Google Scholar
Avanzi, M., & Martin, P.
(2007) L’intonème conclusif: Une fin de phrase en soi? Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 28, 247–258.Google Scholar
Bally, C.
(1965) Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Quatrième edition revue et corrigée. Berne: Éditions Francke.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C.
(2000) Approches de la langue parlée en français. Gap-Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
(2010) Le français: Usages de la langue parlée. Avec la collaboration de Philippe Martin pour l’étude de la prosodie. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Brazil, D.
(1997) The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M.
(2005) A corpus-driven study of discourse intonation: The Hong Kong corpus of spoken English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cresti, E., & Moneglia, M.
(Eds.) (2005) C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, A.
(1997) Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deulofeu, J.
(2013) Le rôle de l’élément que dans les phénomènes de subordination. In J.-M. Debaisieux (Ed.), Analyses linguistiques sur corpus: Subordination et insubordination en français (pp. 427–497). Cachan: Hermès & Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., Cumming, S., Schuetze-Coburn, S., & Paolino, D.
(1992) Discourse transcription. Santa Barbara, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California.Google Scholar
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2004) Representing discourse, Part 2: Appendices and projects. Santa Barbara, CA: Linguistics Department, University of California.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., & Cassidy, S.
(1999) Techniques in speech acoustics. Dodrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A.
(Eds.) (1998) Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Izre’el, S.
(2012) Basic sentence structure: A view from spoken Israeli Hebrew. In S. Caddéo, M.-N. Roubaud, M. Rouquier, & F. Sabio (Eds.), Penser les langues avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste (pp. 215–227). Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
Izre'el, S.
(2018a) Unipartite clauses: A View from Spoken Israeli Hebrew. In M. Tosco (Ed.), Afroasiatic: Data and Perspectives (pp. 235 – 259). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Syntax, Prosody, Discourse and Information Structure: The Case for Unipartite Clauses. A View from Spoken Israeli Hebrew. Revista de Estudos da linguagem 26/4, 1675–1726.Google Scholar
Izre’el, S.
this volume). The basic unit of language and the interface between prosody, discourse and syntax: A view from spontaneous spoken Hebrew. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso Eds. In search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven approach Amsterdam John Benjamins
Martin, P.
(2009) Intonation du français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Martin, J.-P.
(2015) The structure of spoken language: Intonation in romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mettouchi, A., Vanhove, M., & Caubet, D.
(Eds.) (2015) Corpus-based studies of lesser-described languages: The CorpAfroAs corpus of spoken AfroAsiatic languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M.
(2002) Rhetorical nominalization in Barbareno Chumash. In L. Conathan & T. McFarland (Eds.), Report #12: Proceedings of the 50th anniversary conference of the survey of California and other Indian languages (pp. 55–63). Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
(2005) On the assumption of the sentence as the basic unit of syntactic structure. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges, & D. S. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories (pp. 169–183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language, 83, 69–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse markers: Language, meaning and context. In D. Shiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis 1 (pp. 54–75). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silber-Varod, V.
(2011) The SpeeCHain perspective: Prosody-syntax interface in spontaneous spoken Hebrew (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tel-Aviv University, Israel. Retrieved from http://​www​.openu​.ac​.il​/Personal​_sites​/vered​-silber​-varod​/download​/Vered%20Silber​-Varod%20Dissertation​-7​.pdf
(2013) The SpeeCHain perspective: Form and function of prosodic boundary tones in spontaneous spoken Hebrew. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar