Ädel, Annelie & Römer, Ute
Altenberg, Bengt & Granger, Sylviane
2001The grammatical and lexical patterning of make in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 173–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2018AntConc (Version 3.5.7) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL] (15 October 2019).
Arnold, Jennifer E., Losongco, Anthony, Wasow, Thomas & Ginstrom, Ryan
2000Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1): 28–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin & Levy, Roger
2006The chicken of the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language 82(2): 233–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bever, Thomas G.
1970The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Cognition and the Development of Language, John R. Hayes (ed.), 279–362. New York NY: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Ford, Marilyn
2010Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1): 168–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana & Baayen, R. Harald
2007Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds), 69–94. Amsterdam: KNAW.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2013Usage-based theory and exemplar representation. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffman & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 49–69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus & Szczesniak, Konrad
2008Argument realisation, information status and syntactic weight: A learner-corpus study of the dative alternation. In Corpus Linguistics and Research into Second Language Acquisition, Maik Walter & Patrick Grommes (eds), 165–187. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Childers, Jane B. & Tomasello, Michael
2001The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology 37(6): 739–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001A Common European Framework of Reference for Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa & Lieven, Elena
2005Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4): 437–474.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
2002Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Ferreira-Junior, Fernando
2009Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal 93(3): 370–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., O’Donnell, Matthew B. & Römer, Ute
2013Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning 63(1): 25–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014The processing of verb–argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1): 55–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, Søren W.
2015What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning 65(1): 33–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Construction at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Meunier, Fanny
(eds) 2015The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2004Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Wulff, Stefanie
2005Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3(1): 82–200.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela
1994Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 237–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2005Lexical Priming. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huang, James C. T.
1984On the typology of zero anaphora. Language Research 20(2): 85–105.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme
2008Phraseology and language pedagogy: Semantic preference associated with English verbs in the British National Corpus. Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching 32(3): 21–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Myung-Hee
2002Uses of Make in Korean EFL learner writing: A corpus-based study. English Education 57(4): 297–314.Google Scholar
Kim, Hansaem
2006Korean National Corpus in the 21st Century Sejong Project. Proceedings of the 13th NIJL International Symposium, 49–54. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Kim, Hyunwoo, Choi, Heyeon & Yang, Hyun-Kwon
2013Developmental patterns of Korean EFL learners’ English argument structure constructions. Social and Behavioral Sciences 97: 397–404.Google Scholar
Kim, Su Jeong
2015The effect of learner proficiency and L1transfer on the use of Make by Korean EFL learners of English. Language Research 51(1): 139–166.Google Scholar
Laufer, Batia & Waldman, Tina
2011Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus-analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61(2): 647–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Choonhee
2015Corpus-based analysis of ditransitive construction by Korean university students. Studies in English Language & Literature 41(4): 167–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hee-Kyung
2011Investigating the applicability of the CEFR to a placement test for an English language program in Korea. English Language and Linguistics 17(3): 29–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, In
2016Young Korean learners’ usage of the verb give: Evidence from their narratives. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 24(1): 21–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yun Jeong
2016An Analysis of the Authenticity of the Words in Scholastic Proficiency Tests and High School English Texts. MA thesis, The Graduate School of Changwon National University, Korea.Google Scholar
Manzanares, Javier Valenzuela & Lopez, Ana María Rojo
2008What can language learners tell us about constructions? In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, Sabine De Knop & Teun De Rycker (eds), 197–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2003The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching, Applied Linguistics 24(2): 223–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
1996Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborne, John
2015-Transfer and learner corpus research. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 333–356. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Arum, Lim, Seunghee & Hong, Munpyo
2015Zero object resolution in Korean. In Proceedings of the 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing, Shanghai 30 October1 November, 439–448. Shanghai: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York NY: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2017R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]> (15 October 2019).
Rah, Yangon, & Kim, Hyunwoo
2018Construction-based approach to teaching the English resultative construction to Korean EFL learners. System 72(1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seok-Chae & Jung, Chae Kwan
2014Compilation of the Yonsei English Learner Corpus (YELC) 2011 and its use for understanding current usage of English by Korean pre-university Students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 14(11): 1019–1029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
2014Explicit knowledge and processes from a usage-based perspective: The developmental trajectory of an instructed L2 learner. Language Learning 64(4): 771–808. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, Ute
2004aA corpus-driven approach to modal auxiliaries and their didactics. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John Sinclair (ed.), 185–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004bComparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. In Studies in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], Guy Aston, Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds), 151–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2011Corpus research application in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 205–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Matthew B.
2011From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student. Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 6(2): 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryu, Seung Yeon
2017A Corpus-based Analysis of English Phrasal Verbs in Elementary/Middle/High School Textbooks. MA thesis, The Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Sung, Min-chang & Yang, Hyun-Kwon
2016Effects of construction-centered instruction on Korean students’ learning of English transitive resultative constructions. In Applied Construction Grammar, Sabine De Knop & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds), 89–114. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
1990Information flow and dative shift in English discourse. In Development and Diversity: Variation across Time and Space, Jerold Edmondson, Crawford Feagin & Peter Mühlhäusler (eds), 239–253. Dallas, TX: SIL.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
2002Postverbal Behavior. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas & Arnold, Jennifer
2003Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 119–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Qi
2015Lexical priming effects of textbooks on EFL Learners’ use of give. English Language Teaching 8(10): 123–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Item-based foreign language learning of give ditransitive constructions: Evidence from corpus research. System 63: 65–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Year, Jungeun & Gordon, Peter
2009Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. The Modern Language Journal 93(3): 399–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar