Changes in transitivity and reflexive uses of sit
(me/myself down) in Early and Late Modern
English
This chapter seeks to establish if the Transitivity Hypothesis
(Hopper & Thompson 1980) can explain
the variation in the use of two reflexive strategies with the verb sit
in Early Modern English (e.g. I sat me down/I sat myself down) and the
verb’s subsequent transitivization (e.g. he sat me down). By studying
data from large historical corpora, we will re-evaluate the results of earlier research
and establish why sit continued to be used with the simple reflexive
strategy (i.e. with object pronouns) until the Late Modern period. In our analysis of
the transitivization of sit (down), we focus on both micro-level
semantic and syntactic factors and more general developments that have supported the
transitivization of verbs in Late Modern English.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background and reflexivity in the history of English
- 2.1Defining reflexivity
- 2.2Reflexive strategies in the history of English
- 2.3The Transitivity Hypothesis in the context of this study
- 3.Corpora and databases
- 4.Simple and SELF-reflexives with sit and the transitivization of
sit down
- 4.1Sit in the Early Modern period: Simple and SELF-strategies in the EEBO Corpus
- 4.2Expressing telic and atelic aspect with the simple and the
SELF-strategies
- 4.3The transitivization of sit down
- 4.3.1Overlap between sit and set and early
examples of the transitivization of sit down
- 4.3.2Recent developments in the transitivization of sit
down: Evidence from COHA
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix