List of figures
Figure 1.Narrow and broad approaches to conjunction and conjunctive markers
Figure 2.Approaches to cohesive conjunction
Figure 3.Cline of explicitness (Castagnoli 2009: 56)
Figure 4.
Celce-Murcia and Larsen-Freeman’s (1999: 326) classification of relations of contrast
Figure 5.System of conjunction in Halliday and Matthiessen (2004: 541)
Figure 6.The ENPC model (Johansson 2007: 11)
Figure 7.The systems of clause complexing (Halliday & Matthiessen 2004: 373)
Figure 8.Mapping of the experiential and textual metafunctions
Figure 9.Main methodological steps followed to extract the data set from the comparable corpus
Figure 10.Extract of the concordance of English yet in Mult-Ed (WST6)
Figure 11.Extract of the concordance of French or in LOCRA (WST6)
Figure 12.Decision tree for discourse segmentation
Figure 13.Proportion of use of each type of conjunctive marker in English and French (in percent)
Figure 14.Standardised residuals for the proportions of use of English and French types of CMs
Figure 15.Cumulative percentages of the English and French conjunctive markers of contrast in the Mult-Ed corpus
Figure 16.Standardised residuals for the types of clauses hosting English and French conjunctive adjuncts
Figure 17.Standardised residuals for the rank status of clauses hosting English and French conjunctive adjuncts
Figure 18.Standardised residuals for the types of clauses hosting English and French coordinators of contrast
Figure 19.Standardised residuals for the rank status of clauses hosting English and French coordinators of contrast
Figure 20.Standardised residuals for the types of clauses hosting English and French subordinators of contrast
Figure 21.Standardised residuals for the rank status of clauses hosting English and French subordinators of contrast
Figure 22.Breakdown of the clause types per subordinator in English
Figure 23.Breakdown of the clause types per subordinator in French
Figure 24.Breakdown of the rank statuses per conjunctive adjunct in English
Figure 25.Placement patterns of English conjunctive adjuncts in LOCRA and Mult-Ed
Figure 26.Placement patterns of French conjunctive adjuncts in LOCRA and Mult-Ed
Figure 27.Classification tree for conjunctive adjunct placement as a function of language and register
Figure 28.Individual placement patterns of English conjunctive adjuncts of contrast (in percent)
Figure 29.Individual placement patterns of French conjunctive adjuncts of contrast (in percent)
Figure 30.Individual placement patterns of English conjunctive adjuncts of contrast per register (in percent)
Figure 31.Individual placement patterns of French conjunctive adjuncts of contrast per register (in percent)
Figure 32.Classification and Regression Tree for conjunctive adjunct placement as a function of register and lexis in English
Figure 33.Classification and Regression Tree for conjunctive adjunct placement as a function of register and lexis in French