Cover not available
Part of
Integrating Chinese Linguistic Research and Language Teaching and Learning
Edited by Hongyin Tao
[Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 7] 2016
► pp. 169–194

Patterns of plural NP + dou (都) expressions in conversational discourse and their pedagogical implications

| California State University at Long Beach
ORCID logo | University of California, Los Angeles
As a common adverb, dou (都) ‘all, every, completely, even’ has received extensive attention from various theoretical approaches. However, most previous studies tend to focus on its semantic scope and quantification functions. In this paper, we take an interactional linguistics approach to explore one of the most commonly seen subtypes of dou expressions, Plural NP + dou, in conversational discourse. Our findings show that, in general, subjective use outnumbers objective use, contrary to what is implied in most earlier studies. On the basis of the discourse-based findings, we propose ways to integrate the research results in language teaching, with particular reference to material design, classroom activities, and assessment methods.
Keywords: dou (‘all'), interactional linguistics, quantifier, scope, subjectivity
Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.7.09wu
References (49)
References
Beijing Yuyan Xueyuan (BJYYXY). 1986. Modern Chinese Frequency Dictionary (现代汉语频率词典). Beijing: Yuyan Xueyuan Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn, and Wendi Gardner. 1996. “Who is This "we"? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1): 83-93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Donn. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy. 1997. Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-shen. 1995. “On dou-quantification.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 197-234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012. “On Affectivity and Preference in Response to Rejection.” Text & Talk 32 (4): 453-475.Google Scholar
Dong, Weiguang (董为光). 2003. “On the Semantic Features of the Adverb dou (副词“都”的逐一看待特性).” Studies in Language and Linguistics (语言研究) 23 (1): 96-98. Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139-182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and Ruqayia Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael and Elizabeth Hardie. 1991. “Social Attraction, Personal Attraction and Self-categorization: A field Study.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (2): 175–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael and Deborah Terry. 2000. “Social Identity and Self-categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts.” Academy of Management Review 25 (1): 121–140.Google Scholar
Huang, Nansong. 2015. “Research-based Classroom Grammar Instruction on suo3you3 (all) and dou1 (all).” Presentation at the 2015 ACTFL Convention and World Languages Expo , San Diego, CA.
Huang, Zanhui (黄瓒辉). 2004. Quantifier Dou and the Focus Structure of Sentence (量化副词“都”与句子的焦点结构), Ph.D. Dissertation. Peking University. Google Scholar
Huang, Wenfeng (黄文枫). 2010. “On the Question of dou Functioning to Quantify the Time Adverb (“都”量化时间副词现象研究).” Chinese Teaching in the World (世界汉语教学) 24 (3): 373-382. Google Scholar
Jiang, Yan (蒋严). 1998. “Pragmatic Reasoning and Syntactic/semantic Characterization of dou (语用推理与“都”的句法/ 语义特征).” Modern Foreign Languages (现代外语) 1, 10-24. Google Scholar
Lan, Binhan (兰宾汉). 1988. “The Semantics of Adverb dou and its Constraining Effect on the Following Verb (副词“都”的语义及其对后面动词的限制作用).” Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (语言教学与研究) 2, 46-51.Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas Hun-Tak. 1986. Studies on Quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lee, Heeju, Danjie Su, and Hongyin Tao. In progress. “A Crosslinguistic Study of Some Extended Uses of what-based Interrogative Expressions in Chinese, English, and Korean.” University of California, Los Angeles.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1998. “Distributivity in Chinese and its Implications.” Natural Language Semantics 6: 201–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang (吕叔湘). 1980. Eight Hundred Words of Modern Chinese Language (现代汉语八百词). Beijing: The Commercial Press (商务印书馆). Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1981. Language, Meaning and Context. London: Fontana Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Ma, Zhen (马真). 1983. “Position of the Scoped Object of dou/quan (关于“都／全”所总括的对象的位置).” Chinese Language Learning (汉语学习) 1: 27-34. Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael, and Ronald Carter. 1995. “Spoken Grammar: What is it and How can we Teach it?” ELT Journal 49 (3): 207-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mori, Junko. 2007. “Exploring the Intersection of Second Language Acquisition, Conversation Analysis, and Foreign Language Pedagogy.” Modern Language Journal, 91 (5): 847–860.Google Scholar
Mori, J. and N.P.P. Markee (eds.). 2009. “Language Learning, Cognition, and Interactional Practices.” Special Issue of International Review Linguistics in Language Teaching 47 (1): 1-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunan, David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel Schegloff and Sandra Thompson. (eds). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Haihua. 2006. “Focus, Tripartite Structure, and the Semantic Interpretation of Mandarin dou （焦点,三分结构与汉语”都”的语义解释）.” Research and Exploration on Grammar (语法研究和探索) 13: 163-184. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1978. “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 79-112. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992 [1972]. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. I & II. ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1988. “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 89-135. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2005. “The Gap between Natural Speech and Spoken Chinese Teaching Material: Toward a Discourse Approach to Pedagogy.” Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 40 (2): 1-24.Google Scholar
. 2011. Working with Spoken Chinese. State College, PA: Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research (CALPER) Publications, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Taylor, Donald and Lise Dubé. 1986. “Two Faces of Identity: The "I" and the "we.”” Journal of Social Issues 42 (2): 81-98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1982. “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization.” In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfred Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification”. In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124-139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Huan (王还). 1983. “On all and dou (“ALL”与“都”).” Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (语言教学与研究) 4: 24-28.Google Scholar
(王还). 1988. “Rethinking dou (再谈谈“都”).” Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (语言教学与研究) 2: 52-53. Google Scholar
Wang, Hong (王红). 1999. “Analysis of the Senses of the adverb dou (副词“都”的语法意义试析).” Chinese Language Learning (汉语学习) 6: 55-60. Google Scholar
Wu, Haiping. 2014. “Agreement and Disagreement in Natural Conversation and Traditional Language Textbooks (自然会话和传统语言教材表现语言行为之差异: 以赞同和反对为例).” Chinese Language in the World (国际汉语) 3: 12-23.Google Scholar
Xu, Jie (徐杰). 1985. “The Occurrence Principle and Positional Features of Items Scoped by Adverbs Like dou (“都”类副词的总括对象及其隐现、位序).” Chinese Language Learning (汉语学习) 1: 10-15.Google Scholar
Xu, Songlie (徐颂列). 1993. “A Semantic Analysis of the Totalizing dou (表总括的“都” 的语义分析).” Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (语言教学与研究) 4: 75-86.Google Scholar
Xu, Yizhong (徐以中) and Yiming Yang (杨亦鸣). 2005. “The Subjectivity, Objectivity and Pragmatic Ambiguity of Chinese adverb dou (副词“都”的主观性、客观性及语用歧义).” Studies in Language and Linguistics (语言研究) 25 (3): 24-29.Google Scholar
Yuan, Yulin (袁毓林). 2010. “On the Question-driven Approach to Grammatical Researches: A Case Study of the Exploration of the Semantic Function of dou (一种由问题推动的语法研究路线——以副词“都”语义功能的探索为例).” Journal of Suzhou College of Education (苏州教育学院学报) 27 (2): 2-11.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yisheng (张谊生). 2003. “On the Selective Restrictions of Chinese Adverb dou (范围副词“都”的选择限制).” Chinese Language (中国语文) 5: 392-398.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Woo, I-hao
2022. Pedagogical issues related to the adverb dou [都] in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research 11:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.