Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German
Knowing that the so-called voiced and voiceless stops in languages like English and German do not always literally differ in voicing, several linguists among them Roman Jakobson have proposed that dichotomies such as fortis/lenis or tense/lax might be more suitable to capture the invariant phonetic core of this distinction. Later it became the dominant view that voice onset time or laryngeal features are more reasonable alternatives. However, based on a number of facts and arguments from current phonetics and phonology this book claims that the Jakobsonian feature tense was rejected prematurely. Among the theoretical aspects addressed, it is argued that an acoustic definition of distinctive features best captures the functional aspects of speech communication, while it is also discussed how the conclusions are relevant for formal accounts, such as feature geometry. The invariant of tense is proposed to be durational, and its basic correlate is proposed to be aspiration duration. It is shown that tense and voice differ in their invariant properties and basic correlates, but that they share a number of other correlates, including F0 onset and closure duration. In their stop systems languages constitute a typology between the selection of voice and tense, but in their fricative systems languages universally tend towards a syncretism involving voicing and tenseness together. Though the proposals made here are intended to have general validity, the emphasis is on German. As part of this focus, an acoustic study and a transillumination study of the realization of /p,t,k,f,s/ vs. /b,d,g,v,z/ in German are presented.
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 44] 1998. xx, 394 pp.
Publishing status:
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. xi
-
Preface | p. xiii
-
1. Introduction | p. 1
-
2. Voicing and Aspiration in the Literature | p. 33
-
3. Acoustics: Temporal Parameters | p. 69
-
4. Acoustics: Perturbation Effects | p. 95
-
5. Distinctive feature Analysis of Tense/Lax Stops | p. 117
-
6. Fricatives and Stop/Fricative Differences | p. 165
-
7. Articulation: Evidence from Transillumination | p. 189
-
8. Perspectives | p. 249
-
Appendix | p. 305
-
Notes | p. 325
-
-
Subject Index | p. 379
-
Name Index | p. 389
“[...] Michael Jessen accomplishes his task successfully, combining an exhaustive phonetic analysis with in-depth phonological theorizing.”
Gisela Collischonn, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in Language Vol. 78:2, 2002
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Kulikov, Vladimir, Najlla Al-Hajri & Buthaina Al-Kuwari
2023. Generational changes in VOT in Qatari Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXIV [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 12], ► pp. 33 ff.
Zebe, Franka
Kornder, Lisa & Ineke Mennen
Choi, Jiyoun, Sahyang Kim, Taehong Cho & Leonardo Lancia
Jesus, Luis M. T. & Maria Conceição Costa
Luef, Eva Maria
Falkert, Anika, C. Granget, M.-A. Dat, D. Guedat-Bittighoffer & C. Cuet
Nasukawa, Kuniya
2017. The relative salience of consonant nasality and true obstruent voicing. In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 146 ff.
Wade, Lacey
Skarnitzl, Radek & Pavel Šturm
Caratini, Emilie
Pape, Daniel & Luis M T Jesus
Chen, Yiya
PURNELL, THOMAS, JOSEPH SALMONS & DILARA TEPELI
Jessen, Martin, Stefan Gfroerer & Olaf Köster
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General