The term impersonal is used in the literature to denote subjectless constructions, constructions featuring only a pleonastic subject, and constructions which lack a specified agent. This chapter focuses on the third of these types, which are often expressed in languages by the non-personal use of personal pronouns (pronominal impersonals) or by agentless passives, reflexive impersonals and participial impersonals (here designated by the cover term ‘verbal impersonals’). This chapter compares the use of pronominal impersonals, in particular that of the third person plural with verbal impersonals, with respect to their referential range. Adopting the principles of grammaticalization, I argue that third person plural constructions are more referentially restricted than their verbal counterparts.
2021. Developing and validating a visual questionnaire for the study of impersonalisation strategies: A design thinking approach. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2 ► pp. 152 ff.
Data-Bukowska, Ewa
2019. Coming nearer and nearer: A cognitive grammar account of the third person plural impersonal. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives :19
2018. La référence impersonnelle humaine en langue des signes française. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :34
Varjo, Mikael & Karita Suomalainen
2018. From zero to ‘you’ and back: A mixed methods study comparing the use of two open personal constructions in Finnish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:3 ► pp. 333 ff.
Skorupa, Pavel & Tatjana Dubovičienė
2017. Pronouns as Means of Impersonal Presentation in English Quality Press. Coactivity: Philology, Educology 24:2 ► pp. 82 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.