Cover not available
Part of
Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 53–84

The cultural classification of ‘things’

A system network for English noun senses

We begin by distinguishing between an ontology and a semantic system networkfor noun senses. i.e. a cultural classification of ‘things’. Next, we locate this ina systemic functional lexicogrammar, and evaluate two ways of representingit. Then we explore: (i) the reason for its overall structure; (ii) the central roleof probabilities; (iii) how to model the [mass] v [count] distinction (and twoothers; (iv) two crucial non-taxonomic relationships; (v) three types of non-experientialmeaning; and (vi) the key role of realization rules in generatingnouns as heads of nominal groups. With nearly 5,000 noun senses, the CardiffGrammar’s network for the cultural classification of “things” is probably thelargest in existence. Yet it needs further development, and readers are invitedboth to use this valuable resource and to help expand it.
Keywords: cultural classification of ‘things’, modelling lexis, noun senses, ontology, probabilities in lexis, semantic system network
Published online: 22 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.03faw
References (33)
Bateman, J.A. (1990). Upper modelling: organizing language for natural language processing. In Proceedingss of 5th international workshop on natural language generation (pp. 54–61). Pittsburgh.
Berry, M. (1977). Introduction to Systemic Linguistics, Vol 2: Levels and links . London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Butler, C.S. (2003a). Structure and function: An introduction to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. (2003b). Structure and function: An introduction to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cross, M. (1993). Collocation in computer modelling of lexis as most delicate grammar. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 196–220). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R.P. (1980). Cognitive Linguistics and social interaction: Towards an integrated model of a Systemic Functional Grammar and the other components of an interacting Mind . ­Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
. (1994). On moving on on ontologies: mass, count and long thing things. In D. McDonald (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on natural language generation (pp. 71–80). DOI logo
. (1996). A systemic functional approach to complementation in English. In M. Berry, C.S. Butler, R.P. Fawcett, & G. Huang (Eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic Functional interpretations . Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday (pp. 297–366). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. (2000/10). A theory of syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Paperback edition with new preface and updated bibliography 2010. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Modelling “selection” between referents in the English nominal group: an essay in scientific inquiry in linguistics. In C.S. Butler, R. Hidalgo Downing, & J. Lavid (Eds.), Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse: In honour of Angela Downing (pp. 195–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. (2008). Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An extension and simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar . 3rd edition. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. (2010). How to analyze participant roles – and so process types – in English. ‘Work in progress’ draft for Chapter 2 of Fawcett, Robin P., (forthcoming 2015c), The functional semantics handbook: Analyzing English at the level of meaning . London: Equinox. Available from [email protected].Google Scholar
. (2011). Problems and solutions in identifying processes and participant roles in discourse analysis. Part 1: Introduction to a systematic procedure for identifying processes and participant roles. Annual Review of Functional Linguistics , 3, 34–87.Google Scholar
. (2012). Problems and solutions in identifying processes and participant roles in discourse analysis. Part 2: How to handle metaphor, idiom and six other problems. Annual Review of Functional Linguistics , 3, 27–76.Google Scholar
. (forthcoming 2015a). An integrative architecture of language and its use for Systemic Functional Linguistics and other theories of language . London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. (forthcoming 2015b). The functional semantics handbook: Analyzing English at the level of meaning . London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R.P., Tucker, G.H., & Lin, Y.Q. (1993). How a systemic functional grammar works: The role of realization in realization. In H. Horacek, & M. Zock (Eds.), New concepts in natural language generation (pp. 114–186). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. In Word , 17, 241–292.Google Scholar
. (1994). An introduction to Functional Grammar . 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. (1970/2002). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.). (1970). New Horizons in Linguistics (pp. 140–165). Harmondsworth: Penguin; and ­Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). On Grammar . Volume 1. In J. Webster (Ed.), Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday (pp. 173–195). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition . London: Cassell Academic.Google Scholar
. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar . 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. (1987/1996). The grammarian’s dream: Lexis as most delicate grammar. In M.A.K. Halliday, & R.P. Fawcett (Eds.), (1987), New developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol 1: Theory and description (pp. 184–211). London: Pinter. Also in R. Hasan (1996), Ways of saying, ways of meaning (pp. 73–103). London: Cassell Academic.Google Scholar
Huang, G. (2003). Enhanced theme in English: Its structures and functions . Shangxi: Shangxi Educational Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vols 1 & 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., & Bateman, J.A. (1991). Text generation and Systemic Functional Linguistics . London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Neale, A. (2002a). More delicate TRANSITIVITY: Extending the PROCESS TYPE system networks for English to include full semantic classifications . PhD Thesis. Cardiff: Centre for Language and Communication Research, Cardiff University. Available on request via [email protected].Google Scholar
. (2002b). The process type data base . Available on request via [email protected].Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1995). Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary . London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tucker, G.H. (1996). Cultural classification and system networks: A systemic functional approach to lexis. In M. Berry, C.S. Butler, R.P. Fawcett, & G.W. Huang (Eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic Functional interpretations (Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday) (pp. 533–567). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. (1998). The lexicogrammar of adjectives: A Systemic Functional approach to lexis . London: Cassell Academic.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fontaine, Lise
2017. Lexis as most local context: towards an SFL approach to lexicology. Functional Linguistics 4:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.