Article published in:Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 129–150
Modification as a propositional act
A complete functional theory of grammar should be able to specify the communicative function of each constituent in a sentence (or rather ‘Discourse Act’). Whereas predicating and referring have been given due attention in functional approaches to grammar, the modifying function of linguistic material in a Discourse Act has been largely ignored. This chapter argues (i) that modifying is no less actional than predicating or referring in the process of verbal communication and (ii) that the modifying function of linguistic material should be specified at the highest level of representation in Functional Discourse Grammar. Apart from Attitudinal Modification, there are at least five Subacts of Modification that are required for an adequate functional analysis of noun phrases and clauses: classifying modification, qualifying modification, quantifying modification, localizing modification and discoursereferential modification.
Keywords: functional modifier categories, layered representation, modification, propositional act, semantic scope
Published online: 22 July 2014
García Velasco, D., & Rijkhoff, J.
Groot, C. de
Gunkel, L., & Zifonun, G.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, J.L.
(2012) The noun phrase in the languages of South America (PhD dissertation Radbout University Nijmegen; LOT Dissertation Series 301). Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. Available online at <http://www.lotpublications.nl/index3.html>
Lehman, C., & Shin, Y-M.
Levi, Judith N.
(1973) Where do all those other adjectives come from?. In C. Corum, T. Cedrik Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), You take the high node and I’ll take the low node: papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 13–15, 1973 (pp. 332–345). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
(2002) English compounds and Russian relational adjectives. In G.S. Morrison, & L. Zsoldos (Eds.), Proceedings of the North West Linguistics Conference 2002 (pp. 95–114). Burnaby, Greater Vancouver, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University Linguistics Graduate Student Association. http://edocs.lib.sfu.ca/projects/NWLC2002/.
Nordlinger, R., & Sadler, L.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
To appear). Mereology in a functional representation of linguistic structures. In H. Burkhardt, J. Seibt, & G. Imaguire (Eds.) Handbook of mereology München Philosophia Verlag
Rijkhoff, J., & Seibt, J.
(2005) Mood, definiteness and specificity: A linguistic and a philosophical account of their similarities and differences. Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning 3–2, 85–132. Online http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/tfs/article/view/89.
van Baarda, M.J.
Velde, F. Van de