Cover not available
Part of
Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 129–150

Modification as a propositional act

A complete functional theory of grammar should be able to specify the communicative function of each constituent in a sentence (or rather ‘Discourse Act’). Whereas predicating and referring have been given due attention in functional approaches to grammar, the modifying function of linguistic material in a Discourse Act has been largely ignored. This chapter argues (i) that modifying is no less actional than predicating or referring in the process of verbal communication and (ii) that the modifying function of linguistic material should be specified at the highest level of representation in Functional Discourse Grammar. Apart from Attitudinal Modification, there are at least five Subacts of Modification that are required for an adequate functional analysis of noun phrases and clauses: classifying modification, qualifying modification, quantifying modification, localizing modification and discoursereferential modification.
Keywords: functional modifier categories, layered representation, modification, propositional act, semantic scope
Published online: 22 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.06rij
References (77)
Asher, R.E. (1982). Tamil . Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1944)[1932]. Linguistique générale et linguistique française . Berne and Paris: Francke.Google Scholar
Banti, G. (1988). ‘Adjectives’ in East Cushitic. In M. Bechhaus-Gerst, & F. Serzisko (Eds.), Cushitic – Oromo: Papers from the international symposium on Cushitic and Omotic languages, Cologne, January 6–9, 1986 (pp. 205–259). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1967). Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua , 18, 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, C.S. (2003). Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause; Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. (2008). Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences , 30(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, J.J. (1970). Locative, possessive and existential in Swahili. Foundations of Language , 6, 166–177.Google Scholar
Clark, E.V. (1970). Locationals: a study of the relation between ‘existential,’ ‘locative,’ and ‘possessive’ constructions. Working Papers in Language Universals 3 (Stanford University), L1-L36 + xiii.Google Scholar
. (1978). Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In J.H. Greenberg, C.A. Ferguson, & E.A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language, Volume 4: Syntax (pp. 85–126). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1984). Semantic and pragmatic correlates of syntactic categories. In D. Testen, V. ­Mirshra, & J. Drogo (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics (pp. 53–70). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (1990). A conceptual framework for grammatical categories (or: a taxonomy of Propositional Acts).” Journal of Semantics , 7(3), 245–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In P.M. Vogel, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp. 65–102). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Devos, M. (2008). A grammar of Makwe (LINCOM Studies in African Linguistics, 71). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dik, S.C. (1978). Functional Grammar (Publications in Language Sciences, 7). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. (1997). The theory of Functional Grammar . 2nd revised edition, edited by Kees ­Hengeveld). Part 1: The structure of the clause. Part 2: Complex and derived constructions . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? and other essays in semantics and syntax . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia . Oxford: Oxford ­University Press.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, F. (1921). Das Zugehörigkeitsadjektiv und das Fremdwort. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift , 9, 193–200.Google Scholar
Everett, D.L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology , 46(4), 621–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farsi, A.A. (1968). Classification of adjectives. Language Learning , 18, 45–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, W.A. (1986). The Papuan languages of New Guinea . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. (1984). West Greenlandic . London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
García Velasco, D., & Rijkhoff, J. (2008). Introduction. In D. García Velasco, & J. Rijkhoff (Eds.), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar (pp. 1–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Groot, C. de. (2000). The absentive. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 693–719). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gunkel, L., & Zifonun, G. (2009). Classifying modifiers in common names. Word Structure , 2(2), 205–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word , 17, 242–292. Reprinted as Chapter 2 in M. A. K. Halliday (2002), On grammar, Volume 1 of The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, J. J. Webster (ed). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
. (1966). The concept of rank: A reply. Journal of Linguistics , 2, 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to Functional Grammar . 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (2005). To cognize is to categorize: cognition is categorization. In H. Cohen, & C. Levebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 20–44). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, J.L. (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar . Oxford: Oxford ­University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heynderickx, P. (2001). Relationele adjectieven in het Nederlands . Antwerpen: Lessius Hogeschool.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1999). Categoriality of property words in a switch-adjective language. Linguistic Typology , 3(3), 341–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klimaszewska, Z. (1983). Diminutive and augmentative Ausdrücksmöglichkeiten des Niederländischen, Deutschen and Polnischen . Wrocław: Zakład narodowy im. Ossolinskich.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2002). Adnominal possession in the European languages: Form and function. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung , 55(2), 141–172.Google Scholar
. (2003). A woman of sin, a man of duty, and a hell of a mess: Non-determiner genitives in Swedish. In F. Plank (Ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe (pp. 515–558). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krasnoukhova, O. (2012). The noun phrase in the languages of South America (PhD dissertation Radbout University Nijmegen; LOT Dissertation Series 301). Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. Available online at [URL]Google Scholar
Lee, H.H.B. (1989). Korean grammar . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1984). Der Relativsatz: Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik . Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lehman, C., & Shin, Y-M. (2005). The functional domain of concomitance. A typological study of instrumental and comitative relations. In C. Lehmann (Ed.), Typological studies in participation (pp. 9–104). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Levi, Judith N. (1973). Where do all those other adjectives come from?. In C. Corum, T. Cedrik Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), You take the high node and I’ll take the low node: papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 13–15, 1973 (pp. 332–345). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1967). A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language , 3, 390–396.Google Scholar
. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mezhevich, I. (2002). English compounds and Russian relational adjectives. In G.S. Morrison, & L. Zsoldos (Eds.), Proceedings of the North West Linguistics Conference 2002 (pp. 95–114). Burnaby, Greater Vancouver, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University Linguistics Graduate Student Association. [URL].Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2008). Functional categories . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, P. (1987). Hausa and the Chadic languages. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages (pp. 705–723). London and Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, R., & Sadler, L. (2004). Nominal tense in crosslinguistic perspective. Language , 80(4), 776–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, E.F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Olawsky, K. (2006). A grammar of Urarina . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rausch, P.J. (1912). Die Sprache von Südost-Bougainville, Deutsche Salomonsinseln. Anthropos , 7, 105–134, 585–616, 964–994.Google Scholar
Reboul, A. (2001). Foundations of reference and predication. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and linguistic universals – An international handbook. Volume 1 (pp. 509–522). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, J. (1989). The identification of referents. In J.H. Connolly, & S.C. Dik (Eds.), Functional Grammar and the computer (Functional Grammar Series, 10) (pp. 229–246). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. (1990). Toward a unified analysis of terms and predications. In J. Nuyts, A. Machtelt Bolkestein, & C. Vet (Eds.), Layers and levels of representation in language theory: A functional view (pp. 165–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). The noun phrase . Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Expanded paperback version of 2002 hardback edition]Google Scholar
. (2008a). Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In D. ­García Velasco, & J. Rijkhoff (Eds.), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar (pp. 63–115). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2008b). Synchronic and diachronic evidence for parallels between noun phrases and sentences. In F. Josephson, & I. Söhrman (Eds.), Interdependence of diachronic and synchronic analyses (pp. 13–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008c). On flexible and rigid nouns. Studies in Language , 32 (3), 727–752. Reprinted in U. Ansaldo, J. Don, & R. Pfau (Eds.) (2010), Parts of speech: empirical and theoretical advances (pp. 227–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). On the co-variation between form and function of adnominal possessive modifiers in Dutch and English. In W.B. McGregor (Ed.), The expression of possession (pp. 51–106). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2010). Functional categories in the noun phrase: On jacks-of-all-trades and one-trick-ponies in Danish, Dutch and German. Deutsche Sprache, 2010 , (2) [Special issue: Modifikation im Deutschen: Kontrastive Untersuchungen zur Nominalphrase], 97–123.Google Scholar
. (To appear). Mereology in a functional representation of linguistic structures. In H. Burkhardt, J. Seibt, & G. Imaguire (Eds.), Handbook of mereology . München: ­Philosophia Verlag.
Rijkhoff, J., & Seibt, J. (2005). Mood, definiteness and specificity: A linguistic and a philosophical account of their similarities and differences. Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning 3–2, 85–132. Online [URL].Google Scholar
Ross, M. (1998). Proto-Oceanic adjectival categories and their morphosyntax. Oceanic Linguistics , 37(1), 85–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saltarelli, M. (1988). Basque . London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1980). Schools of Linguistics: Competition and evolution . London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Sasse, H-J. (1993). Syntactic categories and subcategories. In J. Jacobs, A. Von, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research [2 volumes] (pp. 646–686). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schaub, W. (1985). Babungo . London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts . Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society , 5, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroomer, H. (1987). A comparative study of three southern Oromo dialects in Kenya: Phonology, morphology and vocabulary (Cushitic Language Studies, 6). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Thomsen, M-L. (1984). The Sumerian language: An introduction to its history and grammatical structure . Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Warren, B. (1984). Classifying adjectives (Gothenburg Studies in English, 56). Sweden: Göteborg.Google Scholar
van Baarda, M.J. (1908). Leiddraad bij het bestuderen van ’t Galela’sch dialekt, op het eiland Halmaheira [Manual for the study of the Galela dialect, on the island of Halmahera]. The Hague: Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velde, F. Van de. (2007). Interpersonal modification in the English noun phrase. Functions of Language , 14(2), 203–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). The emergence of modification patterns in the Dutch noun phrase. Linguistics , 47(4), 203–230.Google Scholar
. (2012). A structural-functional account of NP-internal mood. Lingua , 122, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1986). What’s in a noun? (or: how do nouns differ in meaning from adjectives?). Studies in Language , 10(2), 353–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rijkhoff, Jan
2024. Nouns and Iconicity of Distance: When Syntactic Proximity to the Noun Mirrors Semantic Closeness. In Nouns and the Morphosyntax / Semantics Interface, ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Mora-Bustos, Armando
2022. Predicados no nucleares en mazahua (otomangue). Lengua y Sociedad 21:2 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.