Article published in:
Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 205228
References
Corcho, O., Fernández, M. & Gómez, A.
(2001)  Technical roadmap v. 1.0 ,IST-OntoWeb Project, Madrid, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. http://​www​.ontoweb​.org​/download​/deliverables​/
D11​_v1​_0​.pdf.Google Scholar
Foley, W.A., & Van Valin, R.D.., Jr
(1977) On the viability of the notion of ‘subject’ in universal grammar. Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society,293–320.
Mairal, R.
in preparation). Cultural distinctiveness and conceptual modelling.
Mairal, R., & Faber, P.
(2002) Functional Grammar and lexical templates. In R. Mairal and M.J. Pérez Quintero (Eds.),New perspectives on predicate argument structure in Functional Grammar (pp. 41–98). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mairal, R., & Periñán, C.
(2009) The anatomy of the lexicon component within the framework of a conceptual knowledge base. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada , 22, 217–244.Google Scholar
(2010) Teoría lingüística y representación del conocimiento: Una discusión preliminar. InD. García Padrón, & M.C. Fumero Pérez (Eds.), Tendencias en lingüística general y aplicada (pp. 155–168). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mairal, R., Periñán, C., & Pérez Cabello de Alba, M.B.
(2012) La representación léxica. Hacia un enfoque ontológico. In R. Mairal, L. Guerrero, & C. González (Eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones (pp. 85–102). Akal: Madrid.Google Scholar
Mairal, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.
(2008) New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model (LCM). Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses , 57, 137–158.Google Scholar
Periñán, C.
(2013) Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. InB. Nolan, & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.) Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics (pp. 205–230). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Periñán, C., & Arcas, F.
(2007) Cognitive modules of an NLP knowledge base for language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natura l, 39, 197–204.Google Scholar
(2010) The architecture of FunGramKB. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation,2667–2674.
Periñán, C., & Mairal, R.
(2009) Bringing Role and Reference Grammar to natural language understanding. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natura l, 43, 265–273.Google Scholar
(2010) La Gramática de COREL: un lenguaje de representación conceptual. Onomazein , 21, 11–45.Google Scholar
(2011) The coherent methodology in FunGramKB. Onomazein , 24, 13–33.Google Scholar
(2012) La dimensión computacional de la Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: La estructura lógica conceptual y su aplicación en el procesamiento del lenguaje natural. In R. Mairal, L. Guerrero, & C. González (Eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones (pp. 333–348). Akal: Madrid.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J.
(1995)  The generative lexicon . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R.D., Jr
(1981) Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language , 5, 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Generalized semantic roles and the syntax-semantics interface. In F. Corblin, C. Dobrovie-Sorin, & J.M. Marandin (Eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 2 (pp. 373–389). The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
(2004) Semantic macroroles in Role and Reference Grammar. In R. ­Kailuweit, & Martin Hummel (Eds.), Semantische rollen (pp. 62–82). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(2005)  Exploring the syntax-semantics interface . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Semantic macroroles and language processing. In I. Bornkessel, M. Schlesewsky, B. Comrie, & A. Friederici (Eds.), Semantic role universals and argument linking: Theoretical, typological and psycho-/neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 263–302). ­Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2009) Privileged syntactic arguments, pivots and controllers. InL. ­Guerrero, S. Ibáñez, & V.A. Belloro (Eds), Studies in Role and Reference Grammar (pp. 45–68). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
(2013) Lexical representation, co-composition, and linking syntax and semantics. In J. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki, & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory (pp. 67–107). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R.D., Jr., & LaPolla, R.J.
(1997)  Syntax: Structure, meaning and function . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R.D. Jr., & Wilkins, D.
(1993) Predicting syntax from semantics. In R.D. Van Valin, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar (pp. 499–534). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cortés-Rodríguez, Francisco José
2016. Towards the computational implementation of Role and Reference Grammar: Rules for the syntactic parsing of RRG Phrasal constituents. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 65  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Mairal-Usón, Ricardo
2015. Constructional meaning representation within a knowledge engineering framework. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.