Cover not available
Part of
Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68] 2014
► pp. 229–250

From directionals to telics

Meaning construction, word-formation and grammaticalisation in Role and Reference Grammar

| University of La Rioja
| University of La Laguna
This chapter deals with the evolution of preverbs and discusses the development of a telic function by directionals after a process of lexicalization and grammaticalization. The main language of analysis is Old English and the discussion includes a comparison with Sanskrit, Gothic and Old Icelandic. The theoretical background is provided by Role and Reference Grammar. The conclusion is reached that a cline of lexicalization and grammaticalization free adverb > preverbal adverb > bound prefix > no prefix can be defined with respect to Sanskrit, Gothic, Old English and Old Icelandic, in such a way that Sanskrit represents the earliest stage of the cline and Old Icelandic the latest.
Keywords: grammaticalization, Layered Structure of the Word, Old English, Role and Reference Grammar
Published online: 22 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.10mar
References (48)
Bauer, A. (2007). Old English –fæst: A case of grammaticalisation. Folia Linguistica Historica , 28(1–2), 27–54.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L., & Traugott, E.C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckso, J. (2008). Preverbs and idiomatization in Gothic . PhD dissertation, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Clark Hall, J.R. (1996 [1896]). A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cortés Rodríguez, F. (2006a). Negative affixation within the Lexical Grammar Model. RæL Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada , 5, 27–56.Google Scholar
. (2006b). Derivational morphology in Role and Reference Grammar: A new proposal. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada , 19, 41–66.Google Scholar
Cortés Rodríguez, F., & Sosa Acevedo, E. (2012). La morfología derivativa. In R. Mairal, L. ­Guerrero, & C. González Vergara (Eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: Introducción, avances y aplicaciones (pp. 19–42). Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
de la Cruz, J. (1975). Old English pure prefixes: Structure and function. Linguistics , 13(145), 47–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egenes, T. (2005). Introduction to Sanskrit . Delhi: Motilal Barnarsidass.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, M. (2007). The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb-particle combination . PhD Dissertation, Radboud Universiteit.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (2008). On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization. Studies in Language , 32(2), 336–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gordon, V. (1927). An introduction to Old Norse . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. (1970). The separable prefixes of Anglo-Saxon . College Park, Maryland: McGrath.Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. (1983). The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the English phrasal verb . Turku: Tutun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Hinderling, R. (1967). Studien zu den starken verbalabstrakten des germanischen . Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenhaus, P. (2005). Lexicalization and Institutionalization. In P. Štekauer, & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 353–373). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. (1975). The syntax of the simple sentence in Proto-Germanic . Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.C. (2003 [1993]). Grammaticalization . Cambridge: Cambrige ­University Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, D. (1980). Patterns of variation and interchangeability in some Old English prefixes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen , 81(2), 127–130.Google Scholar
Kailuweit, R. (2008). Some remarks on RRG and grammaticalization: French verbal periphrases. In R. Kailuweit, B. Wiemer, E. Staudinger, & R. Matasović (Eds.), New applications of Role and Reference Grammar: Diachrony, grammaticalization, Romance languages (pp. 69–86). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. (1992). Semantics and vocabulary. In R. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language I: The beginnings to 1066 (pp. 290–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Killingley, D. (1996). Beginning Sanskrit (vol. 1). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Killingley, S., & Killingley, D. (1995). Sanskrit . München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Kossuth, K. (1980). A case grammar of verbal predicators in Old Icelandic . Göppingen: ­Kümmerle Verlag.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (2002). New reflections in lexicalization and grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and lexical semantics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Arista, J. (2008). Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In R. Van Valin (Ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). A typology of morphological constructions. In C. Butler, & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp. 85–115). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Projections and constructions in Functional Morphology. The case of Old English HRĒOW . Language and Linguistics , 12(2), 393–425.Google Scholar
. (2012a). The Old English prefix ge-: A panchronic reappraisal. Australian Journal of Linguistics , 32(4), 411–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012b). La morfología flexiva. In R. Mairal, L. Guerrero, & C. González ­Vergara (Eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: Introducción, avances y aplicaciones (pp. 43–58). Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Matasović, R. (2008). Patterns of grammaticalization and the LSC. In R. Kailuweit, B. Wiemer, E. Staudinger, & R. Matasović (Eds.), New applications of Role and Reference Grammar: Diachrony, grammaticalization, Romance languages (pp. 45–57). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization . Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papke, J. (2010). Classical Sanskrit preverb ordering: A diachronic study . PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Rask, E. (1843). A grammar of the Icelandic or Old Norse tongue . London: Pickering.Google Scholar
Schäufele, S. (1991). Single-word topicalization in Vedic Prose: A challenge to Government and Binding? In H. Hock (Ed.), Studies in Sanskrit syntax (pp. 153–175). Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass.Google Scholar
Seebold, E. (1970). Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben . The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E., & Dasher, R. (2002). Regularity in semantic change . Cambridge: Cambridge ­University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface . Cambridge: Cambridge ­University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Role and Reference Grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 703–738). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R., & LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function . Cambridge: ­Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Schon, C. (1977). The origin of phrasal verbs in English . PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Voyles, J. (1974). West Germanic inflection, derivation and compounding . Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
. (1992). Early Germanic grammar . San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. (1941 [1889]). Sanskrit grammar . London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Torre Alonso, Roberto
2023. Old English class I strong verbs lemmatisation: A morphological generation approach. Studia Neophilologica 95:3 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Lacalle, Miguel
2022. Old English verbs of depriving: the semantics and syntax of possession transfer. Studia Neophilologica 94:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Lacalle Palacios, Miguel
2021. Old English verbs of increasing: the semantics and syntax of change in size. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 16 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Lacalle Palacios, Miguel
2021. Old English verbs of increasing: the semantics and syntax of change in size. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 16:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Metola Rodríguez, Darío
2017. Strong verb lemmas from a corpus of old english. Advances and issues. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 12:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Novo Urraca, Carmen
2017. The types and categories of Old English recursive compounding. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 12:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Martín Arista, Javier & Raquel Vea Escarza
2016. Assessing the semantic transparency of Old English affixation: adjective and noun formation. English Studies 97:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Tío Sáenz, Marta
2015. The regularization of Old English weak verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 10:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.