Cover not available
Part of
Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change
Edited by Evie Coussé and Ferdinand von Mengden
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 69] 2014
► pp. 83–116

From inferential to mirative

An interaction-based account of an emerging semantic extension

In Yurakaré (isolate, Bolivia), the inferential evidential =tiba has a secondary use in a mirative construction marking unexpected information. This paper proposes that the synchronic interactional uses of =tiba plausibly reflect a diachronic process, namely an emerging semantic extension from inferential to mirative. It is argued that interactional structure is the driving force behind this semantic extension of =tiba, which demonstrates the importance of interactional structure as a factor in language change.
Published online: 10 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.69.04gip
References (33)
References
Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2004). Evidentiality . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A.A., & Slobin, D.I. (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 159–167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bisang, W. (1998). Grammaticalization and language contact, constructions and positions. In A. Giacalone Ramat, & P.J. Hopper (Eds.), The limits of grammaticalization (pp. 13–58). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language . Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology , 1, 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics , 33, 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology , 16, 529–564.Google Scholar
Diewald, G. (2002). A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). The catalytic function of constructional restrictions in grammaticalization. In E. Verhoeven, S. Skopeteas, Y.-M. Shin, Y. Nishina, & J. Helmbrecht (Eds.), Studies on grammaticalization (pp. 219–239). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Faller, M.T. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
van Gijn, R. (2006). A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
van Gijn, R., Hirtzel, V., & Gipper, S. (2006). The Yurakaré Archive Online language documentation, DoBeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. [URL]Google Scholar
Gipper, S. (2011). Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen. Nijmegen: MPI Series in Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, N.W. (2012). “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology , 16, 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirtzel, V. (2010). Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. PhD dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.Google Scholar
Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M. (2000). Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language ( pp. vii–xxviii). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
Maynard, D.W. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction , 30, 93–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. (2007). Endangered languages of lowland tropical South America. In M. Brenzinger (Ed.), Language diversity endangered , (pp. 29–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peterson, T. (2010). Examining the mirative and nonliteral uses of evidentials. In T. Peterson, & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Evidence from evidentials (pp. 129–159). University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Plungian, V.A. (2001). The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics , 33, 349–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language , 50, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An introduction . Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction , 38, 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language , 65, 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). Constructions in grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Dasher, R.B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & König, E. (1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization Vol. I, (pp. 189–218), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language , 12, 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Álvarez, Carlos G., Felipe Torres Morales, Laura C. Culcay & Javiera Amapola Bascuñán Vidal
2021. Cavernomas cerebrales en la infancia y desarrollo atípico de la comunicación y el lenguaje. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia 11:2 ► pp. e70738 ff. DOI logo
Van Rooy, Raf
2020. Language or Dialect?, DOI logo
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. On Englishturn outand Spanishresultarmirative constructions. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. Raisingturn outin Late Modern English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja
2014. Intersubjective evidentials in Yurakaré. Studies in Language 38:4 ► pp. 792 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja
2024. Request for confirmation sequences in Yurakaré. Open Linguistics 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.