Cover not available
Part of
Questioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry: Papers in honor of Ricardo Otheguy
Edited by Naomi Shin and Daniel Erker
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 76] 2018
► pp. 189–208

LatinUs and linguistics

Complaints, conflicts, and contradictions – The anthro-political linguistics solution

| UC San Diego
The languages we study, as well as their speakers and our students, would benefit from a re-imagined approach to linguistics – one that underscores the historical, social, and political contexts surrounding the structures we investigate. Particularly for LatinUs and others whose ways of speaking are stigmatized, a linguistics that focuses on forms while ignoring what people say about their lives alienates the members of those groups who are attracted by the study of language, and its emancipatory possibilities. To combat the reproduction of linguistic and educational inequality, I advocate an anthro-political linguistics, emphasizing the central role that power plays in language and exposing the ways in which language is falsely constructed as the root of educational, cultural, social, and political problems.
Keywords: anthro-political linguistics, linguistic anthropology, LatinUs, Spanish in the U.S
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • WHY do we need more LatinUs in linguistics?
  • Attracting LatinUs
  • Access and admissions criteria
  • What kind of linguistics?
  • Struggling against prescriptivism and linguistic insecurity
  • Concrete solutions for attracting and ensuring successful LatinU majors in linguistics
    • Recruitment and retention in high schools and colleges
    • Provide mentors
    • Tailor topics and examples: “Discouraging professors should be avoided”
    • Encourage students to relate linguistic studies to social realities
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.76.09zen
References (22)
References
American Community Survey. (2015). Table B03001. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. C. 1993. A response to Ladefoged’s other view of endangered languages. Language 69, No.3. September: 575–579.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. (2016, January). Latinos in higher education: Some statistics and reflections to promote a positive environment. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Egalite, A. J., & Kisida, B. (2017). The effects of teacher match on students’ academic perceptions and attitudes. Working Paper. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2006). Interview with William Labov. Journal of English Linguistics, 34, 322–351.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. (1999). Linguistic minorities and modernity: A sociolinguistic ethnography. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Herlihy-Mera, J. (2016, June 23). Colonialism in U.S. Spanish Departments. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (Ed.) (1972) Reinventing anthropology. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. (2001). Identity. In Key terms in language and culture, A. Duranti, Ed. 106–109. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1992. another view of endangered languages. Language, 68 [December], 809–811.Google Scholar
LSA 2015. Anonymous reviewer of proposed panel for LSA 2016 on Latin’s in Linguistics: Challenges and Opportunities, sponsored by the Committee on Ethnic Diversity in Linguistics. Google Scholar
Magaña, R. (2013). The New Mission and Location of United States Spanish Departments: The Mount Holyoke College Experience. Profession. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Pratt, T. (2016). Most Hispanic students never have a teacher who looks like them. The Hechinger Report: Teacher Preparation. (October 25, 2016). Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. (2015, December 15). Retrieved from [URL]
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact, findings and problems. New York, NY: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Zentella, A. C. (1995). The ‘chiquita-fication’ of U.S. Latinos and their languages, or Why we need an anthro-political linguistics. SALSA III: the Proceedings of the Symposium about Language and Society at Austin (pp. 1–18). Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1997). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2013). Bilinguals and borders: California’s Transfronteriz’s and competing constructions of bilingualism. Int’l Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest [IJLASSO] 32.2: 17–50.Google Scholar
(Forthcoming). Aquí no se cogen las guaguas: Language and Puerto Rican Identity in San Diego. In Melvin González Rivera (Ed.), Dialects from tropical islands: Research on Caribbean Spanish in the United States. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
Zerquera, D., & de Mucha Flores, M. (2016). More than Nuance: Recognizing and Serving the Diversity of the Latina/o community. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Bjorndahl, Christina, Lynsey Wolter, Reed Blaylock, Evan D. Bradley, Ann Bunger, Kristin Denham, Jessica A. Grieser, Kazuko Hiramatsu, Wesley Y. Leonard & Michal Temkin Martinez
2024. Increasing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Linguistics Through Small Teaching. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 99:2 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Clemons, Aris Moreno
2024. Apolitical Linguistics Doesn’t Exist, and It Shouldn’t. In Decolonizing Linguistics, ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Viladrich, Anahí
2024. Latinx for whom? Reflections upon the linguistic shaping of Latin American identities in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
McCleary, Bryce
2023. “We All Country”: Region, Place, and Community Language among Oklahoma City Drag Performers. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 98:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Michnowicz, Jim, Rebecca Ronquest, Bailey Armbrister, Nick Chisholm, Rebecca Green, Lindsey Bull & Anne Elkins
2023. Perceptions of inclusive language in the Spanish of the Southeast. Spanish in Context 20:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Potowski, Kim & Lourdes Torres
2023. Spanish in Chicago, DOI logo
Shankar, Shalini
2023. Language and Race: Settler Colonial Consequences and Epistemic Disruptions. Annual Review of Anthropology 52:1 ► pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Ferjan Ramírez, Naja, Daniel S. Hippe, Lili Correa, Josephine Andert & Melissa Baralt
2022. Habla conmigo, daddy! Fathers’ language input in North American bilingual Latinx families. Infancy 27:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Leonard, Wesley Y.
2021. Toward an Anti‐Racist Linguistic Anthropology: An Indigenous Response to White Supremacy. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31:2 ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Arnold, Lynnette
2019. Accompanying as accomplices: Pedagogies for community engaged learning in sociocultural linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:6 DOI logo
Arnold, Lynnette
2024. Living Together Across Borders, DOI logo
Arnold, Lynnette
2024. From Gatekeeping to Inclusion in the Introductory Linguistics Curriculum. In Decolonizing Linguistics, ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Paugh, Amy L. & Kathleen C. Riley
2019. Poverty and Children's Language in Anthropolitical Perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.