Chapter published in:
Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century
Edited by Nancy Stern, Ricardo Otheguy, Wallis Reid and Jaseleen Sackler
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 77] 2019
► pp. 3372
References

References

Contini-Morava, Ellen
(1995) On linguistic sign theory. In E. Contini Morava, & B. Sussman-Goldberg (Eds.), Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory (pp.3–40). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crupi, Charlene
(2004) But still a yet: the quest for a constant semantic value for English yet. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Davis, Joseph
(2002) Rethinking the place of statistics in Columbia School analysis. In W. Reid, R. Otheguy, & N. Stern (Eds.), Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics (pp.65–90). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
(2008–) The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present.Google Scholar
Diver, William
(1975/2012) The nature of linguistic meaning. In A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior: The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp.47–63). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
(1987/2012) The dual. In A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior: The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp.87–99). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
(1990/2012) The elements of a science of language. In A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior: the linguistic essays of William Diver (pp.65–84). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
(1995/2012) Theory. In E. Contini-Morava, & B. Sussman Goldberg (Eds.), Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory (pp.43–114). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Revised and reprinted in (2012) A. Huffman, & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior: The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp.445–519). Leiden/Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
(1950 /1984). The foundations of arithmetic. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
(2011) Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K., & Portner, P. (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp.1660–1712). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huffman, Alan
(1997)  The categories of grammar: French lui and le. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) The linguistics of William Diver and the Columbia School. Word, 52, 29–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward
(1964) Negation in English. In J. Fodor, & J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language (pp.246–323). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William
(1979) Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
(2017) Ten lectures on the basics of cognitive grammar. Leiden / Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Michael
(1986) The English verb: An exploration of structure and meaning. Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo. (2002) Saussurean anti-nomenclaturism in grammatical analysis: A comparative theoretical perspective. In W. Reid, R. Otheguy, & N. Stern (Eds.), Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics (pp.373–403). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.
(1982) Methods of logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter and René Dirven
(2007) Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Wallis
(1991) Verb and noun number in English: A functional explanation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1995) Quantitative analysis in Columbia School theory. In E. Contini-Morava, & B. Sussman Goldberg (Eds.), Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory (pp.115–152). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabar, N.
(2018)  Lexical meaning as a testable hypothesis: The case of English look, see, seem and appear. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar