Chapter published in:
Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 127152


Belloni, S.
(1991) Grammatica veneta. Battaglia Terme: La Galiverna.Google Scholar
Bianchi, G.
(2013) Gender in Italian–German bilinguals: A comparison with German L2 learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 538–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bottari, P., Cipriani, P., & Chilosi, A. M.
(1993–94) Protosyntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition, 3, 327–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandi, L., & Cordin, P.
(1981) Dialetti e italiano: Un confronto sul parametro del soggetto nullo. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 6, 33–87.Google Scholar
(1989) Two Italian dialects and the null subject parameter. In O. Jaeggli, & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 111–142). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cantone, K. F., & Müller, N.
(2008) Un nase or una nase? What gender marking within switched DPs reveals about the architecture of the bilingual language faculty. Lingua, 118(6), 810–826. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(1997) Partitives, reference to kinds and semantic variation. Proceedings of SALT, 7, 73–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chini, M.
(1995) Genere grammaticale e acquisizione. Aspetti della morfologia nominale dell’italiano L2. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Cornips, L., & Hulk, A.
(2006) External and internal factors in bilingual and bidialectal language development: Grammatical gender of the Dutch definite determiner. In C. Lefebvre, L. White, & C. Jourdan (Eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis. Dialogues (pp. 355–378). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cortelazzo, M.
(1999) Itinerari dialettali veneti. Padova: Esedra.Google Scholar
Egger, E., Hulk, A., & Tsimpli, I. -M.
(2016) Cross-linguistic influence in the discovery of gender: The case of Greek-Dutch bilingual children. Ms., Universities of Reading, Amsterdam and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eichler, N.
(2011) Code-Switching bei bilingual aufwachsenden Kindern: Eine Analyse der gemischtsprachlichen Nominalphrasen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Genus. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Flege, J.
(1987) The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I., & Tracy, R.
(1996) Bilingual bootstrapping. Linguistics, 34, 901–926.Google Scholar
Genesee, F.
(1989) Early bilingual development: One language or two? Journal of Child Language, 16, 161–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E., & Paradis, J.
(1995) Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 22, 611–631. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hager, M.
(2014) Genuserwerb bei mehrsprachig aufwachsenden Kindern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bergische Universität Wuppertal.Google Scholar
Hulk, A., & Cornips, L.
(2006) Between 2L1- and child L2 acquisition: An experimental study of bilingual Dutch. In C. Lleó (Ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism (pp. 115–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N.
(2000) Cross-linguistic influence at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 227–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Van der Linden, E.
(2010) How vulnerable is gender? In P. Guijarro-Fuentes, & L. Domínguez (Eds.), New directions in language acquisition: Romance languages in the generative perspective (pp. 107–132). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M.
(2015) Cross-linguistic interaction: A retrospective and prospective view. In E. Babatsouli, & D. Ingram (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015 (pp. 141–167). http://​ismbs​.eu​/data​/documents​/Proceedings​-ISMBS​-2015​.pdf (20 December, 2016).
Klaschik, E.
(2013) Bidialektaler Spracherwerb in Venetien am Beispiel von Genus und Subjektklitika. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Klaschik, E., & Kupisch, T.
(2016) Overt and null subjects in the two varieties in Venetian-Italian school-children. Lingue e Linguaggio, 15, 169–198.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T.
(2007) Determiners in bilingual German-Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 57–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., Müller, N., & Cantone, K.
(2002) Gender in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition: Comparing Italian and French. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1, 107–149.Google Scholar
Lundquist, B., Rodina, Y., Sekerina, I. A., & Westergaard, M.
(2016) Gender change in Norwegian dialects: Comprehension is affected before production. Linguistics Vanguard, 2(1), 69–83.Google Scholar
Marcato, C.
(2004) Il Veneto. In M. Cortelazzo, C. Marcato, N. De Blasi, & G. P. Clivio (Eds.), I dialetti italiani: Storia, struttura, uso (pp. 297–328). Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Moscati, V., & Tedeschi, R.
(2009) The delay of Italian Past Participle Agreement. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G. M. Rheiner (Eds.), BUCLD 33: Proceedings of the 33th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 379–390). Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, G. B.
(1977) Studi di dialettologia e filologia veneta. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Pierantozzi, C.
(2009) La relazione di accordo nel DP misto nel bilinguismo infantile precoce. Tesi di dottorato. Università di Urbino.Google Scholar
Poletto, C.
(1993) La sintassi del soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
(1995) The diachronic development of subject clitics in North-Eastern Italian dialects. In I. Roberts & A. Battye (Eds.), Clause structure and language change (pp. 295–324). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, A., Kupisch, T., Köppe, R., & Azzaro, G.
(2007) Concord, convergence and crash-avoidance in bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 56–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reich, H. H., Roth, H. -J., & Gantefort, C.
(2008) Der Sturz ins Tulpenbeet. Deutsche Sprachversion. Auswertungsbogen und Auswertungshinweise. In T. Klinger, K. Schwippert, & B. Leiblein (Eds.), Evaluation im Modellprogramm FÖRMIG (pp. 209–237). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Rodina, Y., & Westergaard, M.
(2015a) Gender agreement in bilingual Norwegian-Russian acquisition: The role of input and transparency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 227–244. <Crossref> (20 December, 2016)Google Scholar
(2015b) Grammatical gender in Norwegian: Language acquisition and language change. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 27, 145–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarze, C.
(1988) Grammatik der italienischen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L.
(2000) The emergence of functional categories in bilingual first language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, M., & Hulk, A.
(2013) Grammatical gender and the notion of default: insights from language acquisition. Lingua, 137, 128–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S.
(2013) Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 86–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M.
(2009) The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure and Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamboni, A.
(1988) Venezien/Veneto. In G. Holtus, M. Metzeltin, & C. Schmitt (Eds.), Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik (Bd. 4, pp. 517–538). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rodina, Yulia, Tanja Kupisch, Natalia Meir, Natalia Mitrofanova, Olga Urek & Marit Westergaard
2020. Internal and External Factors in Heritage Language Acquisition: Evidence From Heritage Russian in Israel, Germany, Norway, Latvia and the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Education 5 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.