Cover not available
Part of
Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 153–180

The impact of transparency and morpho-phonological cues in the acquisition of grammatical gender in sequential bilingual children and children with Specific Language Impairment

A cross-linguistic study

 | University of Reading
 | University of Edinburgh
 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
 | Utrecht University
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Gender in Greek and Dutch
  • Acquisition of gender in Greek and Dutch L2 children and in children with SLI
  • The present study
    • Methodology
      • Participants
      • Materials
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.52.08mar
References (47)
References
Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, A., & Chila-Markopoulou, D. (2003). Synchronic and diachronic trends in the gender of Modern Greek: A theoretical proposal [in Greek]. In A. Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, A. Ralli, & D. Chila-Markopoulou (Eds.), Gender (pp. 13–56). Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. (2010). Corpus data: Shedding the light on French grammatical gender… or not. EUROSLA Yearbook, 10, 119–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., Polišenská, D., & Unsworth, S. (2008). The acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 24(3), 423–430.Google Scholar
Blom, E., Polišenská, D., & Weerman, F. (2008). Articles, adjectives and age of onset: the acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research, 24, 289–323.Google Scholar
Bol, G. W. (1995). Implicational scaling in child language acquisition: The order of production of Dutch verb constructions. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Papers from the Dutch-German colloquium on language acquisition (Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development). Amsterdam: Institute for General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V. (2008). The acquisition of determiners and clitics in children and adult L2 learners of Greek. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2012). Production and processing asymmetries in the acquisition of tense morphology by sequential bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 15, 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., Van der Hoek, M., & Verwer, R. (2006). The acquisition of grammatical gender in bilingual child acquisition of Dutch (by older Moroccan and Turkish children): The definite determiner, attributive adjective and relative pronoun. In B. Los & J. van de Weijer (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006 (pp. 40–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Swart, H., Winter, Y., & Zwarts, J. (2007). Bare nominals and reference to capacities. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavriilidou, Z., & Efthymiou, A. (2003). The acquisition of Greek gender by preschool children: A pilot study [in Greek]. In A. Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, A. Ralli, & D. Chila-Markopoulou (Eds.), Gender (pp. 190–207). Athens Patakis.Google Scholar
Hatzigeorgiou, N., Gavrilidou, M., Piperidis, S., Carayannis, G., Papakostopoulou, A., Spiliotopoulou, A., Vacalopoulou, A., Labropulou, P., Mantzari, E., Papageorgiou, H., & Demiros, I. (2000). Design and implementation of the online ISLP corpus. Proceedings of the LREC 2000 Conference (pp. 1737–1742). Athens.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F. (2004). Explaining the acquisition of and nonacquisition of determiner–noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 175–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Cornips, L. (2006). The acquisition of definite determiners in child L2 Dutch: problems with neuter gender nouns. In S. Unsworth, T. Parodi, A. Sorace, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Paths of development in L1 and L2 acquisition (pp. 107–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Institute for Language and Speech Processing. (2001). Basic vocabulary. Athens: Institute for Language and Speech Processing.Google Scholar
Keij, B., Cornips, L., van Hout, R., Hulk, A., & Van Emmerik, J. (2012). Knowing versus producing. The acquisition of grammatical gender and the definite determiner in Dutch by L1-TD, L1-SLI, and eL2 children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 379–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konta, I. (2012). Gender assignment and gender agreement in child Greek L2. In Z. Gavriilidou, A. Efthymiou, E. Thomadaki, & P. Kambakis-Vougiouklis (Eds.), Selected papers of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics (pp. 381–389). Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Kort, W., Compaan, E. L., Bleichrodt, N., Resing, W. C. M., Schittekatte, M., Bosmans, M., Vermeir, G. & Verhaeghe, P. (2002). WISC-III NL. Handleiding. London: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2014). Children with Specific Language Impairment (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marinis, T. (2003). The acquisition of the DP in Modern Greek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). On the nature and cause of Specific Language Impairment: A view from sentence processing and infant research. Lingua, 121(3), 463–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., & Saddy, D. (2013). Parsing the passive: Comparing children with Specific Language Impairment to sequential bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mastropavlou, M. (2006). The role of phonological salience and feature interpretability in the grammar of typically developing and language impaired children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Mastropavlou, M., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2011). The role of suffixes in grammatical gender assignment in Modern Greek: A psycholinguistic study. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 11, 27–55.Google Scholar
Orgassa, A., & Weerman, F. (2008). Dutch gender in specific language impairment and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 24, 333–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2004). Comparing L2 and SLI grammars in child French: Focus on DP. In P. Prevost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 89–107). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polišenskà, D. (2010). Dutch children’s acquisition of verbal and adjectival inflection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ralli, A. (2002). The role of morphology in gender determination: Evidence from Modern Greek. Linguistics, 40, 519–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven, J. (2008). Raven’s coloured progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Roesch, A. D., & Chondrogianni, V. (2015). The use of case in the comprehension of wh-questions in pre-school German-speaking children with and without SLI. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2013 (pp. 379–402). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2016). “Which mouse kissed the frog?”: Effects of age of onset, length of exposure and knowledge of case-marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 43, 635–661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheidnes, M. (2015). Gender marking strategies in L2 children and monolingual children with SLI. In C. Hamann & E. Ruigendijk (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2013 (pp. 416–428). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Schlichting, J. E. P .T., & Lutje Spelberg, H. C. (2002). Lexilijst Nederlands [Vocabulary list of Dutch]. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers.Google Scholar
Schuurman, I., Schouppe, M., Hoekstra, H., & Van der Wouden, T. (2003). CGN, an Annotated Corpus of Spoken Dutch. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC-03). Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Snijders, J. T., Tellegen, P. J., & Laros, J. A. (1989). Snijders-Oomen Nonverbal Intelligence Test, SON-R 5½-17, Manual & Research Report. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2000). Diagnostic verbal IQ test for Greek preschool and school age children: Standardization, statistical analysis, psychometric properties. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Speech Therapy (pp. 95–106). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Stephany, U. (1995). The acquisition of Greek. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Hulk, A. (2013). Grammatical gender and the notion of default: insights from language acquisition. Lingua, 137, 128–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2008). Age and input in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 28, 365–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Assessing the role of amount and timing of exposure in simultaneous bilingual development and ultimate attainment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 86–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I. (2014). On the role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 765–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bon, W. H. J., & Hoekstra, W. G. (1982). Taaltests voor kinderen [Language tests for children]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Van Kampen, N. J. (1994). The learnability of the left branch condition. In R. Bok-Bennema & C. Cremers (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, (pp. 83–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, S. (2011). The role of morphology in grammatical gender assignment: A psycho-linguistic study in Greek. In A. Galani, G. Hicks, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Morphology and its interfaces (pp. 321–349). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, S., & Nerantzini, M. (2013). Grammatical gender in Specific Language Impairment: Evidence from determiner-noun contexts in Greek. Psychology, 30, 338–357.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Taaltoets Alle Kinderen (TAK) [Children Language Assessment]. Tilburg: Zwijsen.Google Scholar
Zink, I., & Lejaegere, M. (2002). N-CDI Woordenlijst. Leusden: Acco.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Blom, Elma, Tessel Boerma, Figen Karaca, Jan de Jong & Aylin C. Küntay
2022. Grammatical development in both languages of bilingual Turkish-Dutch children with and without Developmental Language Disorder. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
KUPISCH, Tanja, Natalia MITROFANOVA & Marit WESTERGAARD
2022. Phonological vs. natural gender cues in the acquisition of German by simultaneous and sequential bilinguals (German–Russian). Journal of Child Language 49:4 ► pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
Paspali, Anastasia & Theodoros Marinis
2020. Gender Agreement Attraction in Greek Comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.