Part of
Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 259278
References

References

Adriaans, F.
(2006) PhonotacTools (Test version). [Computer program]. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Archibald, L. M., Joanisse, M. F., & Shepherd, M.
(2008) Associations between key language-related measures in typically developing school-age children. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 216(3), 161–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H.
(1993) The CELEX lexical database (CD-Rom). Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M.
(2014) Problems with tense marking in children with specific language impairment: Not how but when. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 369: 20120401.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V., Adams, C. V., & Norbury, C. F.
(2006) Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short‐term memory deficits: evidence from 6‐year‐old twins. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5(2), 158–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleses, D., Basboll, H., & Vach, W.
(2011) Is Danish difficult to acquire? Evidence from Nordic past tense studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(8), 1193–1231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., & Paradis, J.
(2013) Past tense production by English second language learners with and without Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(1), 281–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Jones, M.
(1997) Verb use in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(6), 1298-1313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B.
(2001) Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(6), 741–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bree, E., Rispens, J., & Gerrits, E.
(2007) Non‐word repetition in Dutch children with (a risk of) dyslexia and SLI. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(11–12), 935–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bree, E., Van der Ven, S., & Van der Maas, H.
(2017) The Voice of Holland: Allograph production in written Dutch past tense inflection. Language Learning and Development, 13(3), 215-240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Schryver, J., Neijt, A., Ghesquière, P., & Ernestus, M.
(2013) Zij surfde, maar hij durfte niet. De spellingproblematiek van de zwakke verleden tijd in Nederland en Vlaanderen. [She surfed, but he dared not. The spelling difficulties of the weak past tense in The Netherlands and Flanders]. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 133–151 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P. M.
(2011) Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect?. Memory, 19(5), 529-537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P. M., & Gathercole, S. E.
(2012) Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Baayen, H.
(2001) Choosing between the Dutch past tense suffixes -te and -de. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 18, 77–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estes, K. G., Evans, J. L., & Else-Quest, N. M.
(2007) Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(1), 177–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E.
(2006) Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(04), 513–543.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., & Parra, M.
(2012) Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of child language, 39(1), 1-27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. J., Tomblin, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2014) Impaired statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in adolescents with specific language impairment. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Unsworth, S.
(2010) Bilingualism as a kind of therapy? Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(02), 297–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(1998) Specific language impairment: A deficit in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 240–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keijzer, M.
(2007) Last in first out?: An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada. Utrecht: LOT/Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kidd, E., & Kirjavainen, M.
(2011) Investigating the contribution of procedural and declarative memory to the acquisition of past tense morphology: Evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 794–829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnert, K., Windsor, J., & Yim, D.
(2006) Do language‐based processing tasks separate children with language impairment from typical bilinguals?. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(1), 19-29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krok, W. C., & Leonard, L. B.
(2015) Past tense production in children with and without Specific Language Impairment across Germanic languages: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(4), 1326–1340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B.
(2014) Children with specific language impairment (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lum, J. A., & Conti-Ramsden, G.
(2013) Long-term memory: A review and meta-analysis of studies of declarative and procedural memory in Specific Language Impairment. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(4), 282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E.
(1994) Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21(2), 339–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Wulfeck, B., & Ellis Weismer, S.
(1999) Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: A study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(1), 206–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. R., & Van der Lely, H. K.
(2007) The impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection in children with Grammatical-SLI. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 9(3), 191–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E.
(2005) Phonological short-term memory skills and new word learning in young Greek children. Memory, 13(3–4), 422–429.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. E., & Theakston, A.
(2006) Errors of omission in English-speaking children’s production of plurals and the past tense: The effects of frequency, phonology and competition. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1027–1052. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messer, M. H., Leseman, P. P. M., Boom, J., & Mayo, A. Y.
(2010) Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(4), 306–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E., Palmer, A., & Marentette, P.
(2007) The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science, 10(2), 237–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norbury, C. F., Bishop, D. V., & Briscoe, J.
(2001) Production of English Finite Verb Morphology. A Comparison of SLI and Mild-Moderate Hearing Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(1), 165–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oetting, J., & Horohov, J.
(1997) Past tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(1), 62–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oostdijk, N.
(2000) The spoken Dutch corpus: Overview and first evaluation. In M. Gravilidou, G. Carayannis, S. Markantonatou, S. Piperidis, & G. Stainhauer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Vol. 2, pp. 887–893). Paris: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Owen, A. J.
(2010) Factors affecting accuracy of past tense production in children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers: The influence of verb transitivity, clause location, and sentence type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 993–1014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M., & Genesee, F.
(2011) Bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 554–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Rice, M., Crago, M., & Marquis, J.
(2008) The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child second language from first language and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 689–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Schneider, P., & Duncan, T. S.
(2013) Discriminating children with language impairment among English-language learners from diverse first-language backgrounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(3), 971–981. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, S. L., & Oetting, J. B.
(2009) Past tense marking by African American English-speaking children as a function of socioeconomic status. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(1), 2–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L., Tomblin, J. B., Hoffman, L., Richman, W. A., & Marquis, J.
(2004) Grammatical tense deficits in children with SLI and nonspecific language impairment: Relationships with nonverbal IQ over time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(4), 816-834. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J. E., & Baker, A.
(2012) Nonword repetition: The relative contributions of phonological short-term memory and phonological representations in children with language and reading impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55(3), 683–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J., & De Bree, E.
(2015) Bilingual children’s production of regular and irregular past tense morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(02), 290–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J. E., & De Bree, E.
(2014) Past tense productivity in Dutch children with SLI: The role of phonology and frequency. Journal of Child Language, 41(1), 200–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J., Baker, A., & Duinmeijer, I.
(2015) Word recognition and nonword repetition in children with language disorders: The effects of neighborhood density, lexical frequency, and phonotactic probability. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(1), 78–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, L.
(2005) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III NL. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test.Google Scholar
Service, E. & Kohonen, V.
(1995) Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(02), 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E., & Brandeker, M.
(2013) The effect of bilingual exposure versus language impairment on nonword repetition and sentence imitation scores. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46(1), 1-16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E., Rothenberg, A., Rivard, M. E., & Naves, R.
(2006) Bilingual assessment: Can overall proficiency be estimated from separate measurement of two languages? Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 4(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I.
(2005) Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41(3), 399–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I.
(2014) The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(04), 765–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vang Christensen, R. & Hansson, K.
(2012) The use and productivity of past tense morphology in specific language impairment: An examination of Danish. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(6), 1671–1689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, J., Leseman, P., & Messer, M.
(2015) Phonological memory and the acquisition of grammar in child L2 learners. Language Learning, 65(2), 417–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P.
(2016) How do verbal short-term memory and working memory relate to the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar? A comparison between first and second language learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 65–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar