Cover not available
Part of
Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In honor of Roumyana Slabakova
Edited by Jacee Cho, Michael Iverson, Tiffany Judy, Tania Leal and Elena Shimanskaya
[Studies in Bilingualism 55] 2018
► pp. 123–148

Chapter 5
The Bottleneck Hypothesis as applied to the Spanish DP

| Wake Forest University
By examining knowledge of interpretive constraints that obtain from new DP feature acquisition in Spanish, this chapter tests the Bottleneck Hypothesis’s claim (Slabakova, 2013, 2014, 2016) that functional morphology is the “bottleneck” of SLA. Individual data from two language groups (Romance (Italian n = 35) and Germanic (English n = 41; German n = 19)) across three tasks testing for knowledge of Spanish DP morphology, syntax and semantics reveal that participants demonstrate knowledge of DP functional morphology before knowledge of the syntax-semantics of adjectival position. The import is twofold: first, individual L2 data is examined across tasks; second, comparing distinct L1 groups makes it possible to ask whether the “bottleneck” is equally problematic for all language pairings, an issue not currently addressed by the hypothesis.
Keywords: Bottleneck Hypothesis, phi-feature acquisition, adjective distribution, SLA, Spanish
Article outline
  • DP syntax in Romance and Germanic
    • The Romance Determiner Phrase: Word order, semantics, and phi-features
    • The Germanic Determiner Phrase
    • The learning task
  • Previous research: Rothman, Iverson, Judy & Guijarro-Fuentes (2009)
    • Research questions and predictions
    • Experimental and control participants
    • Experimental tasks
      • Grammaticality Judgment/Correction Task
      • Semantic Interpretation Task
      • Context-based Collocation Task
  • The data: A closer look
    • Results of Grammaticality Judgment Correction Task (GJCT)
    • Results of Semantic Interpretation Task
    • Results of Context-based Collocation Task (CBCT)
  • The data: A cross-task comparison
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.55.05jud
References (44)
References
Anderson, B. (2007). Learnability and parametric change in the nominal system of L2 French. Language Acquisition, 14(2), 165–214.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Forms of evidence and grammatical development in the acquisition of adjective position in L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 1–30.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulou, A., Español-Echevarría, M., & Prévost, P. (2008). On the acquisition of the prenominal placement of evaluative adjectives in L2 Spanish. In J. Bruhn de Garavito & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 1–12). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (2008). The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 351–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, J. (1991). Nominal enclitics in Romance. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 51–66.Google Scholar
(1992). On the syntactic status of adjectives in Romance. CUNYForum, 17, 105–122.Google Scholar
(2001). Focusing the “right” way in Romance determiner phrases. Probus, 13, 1–30.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33, 1–17.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Carstens, V. (1991). The morphology and syntax of determiner phrase in Kiswahili (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, LA.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1994). On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne (pp. 85–110). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Penke, M., & Parodi, T. (1993/1994). Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition, 3, 395–429.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crisma, P. (1991). Functional categories inside the noun phrase: A study of the distribution nominal modifiers (Unpublished tesi di laurea). Università di Venezia.Google Scholar
(1996). On the configurational nature of adjectival modification. In K. Zagona (Ed.), Grammatical theory and Romance languages (pp. 59–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S. (2003). Feature-driven structure building. A study on the acquisition of noun-phrase and inflection (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial accessibility of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H. (2006). Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers, a missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22, 269–301.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Judy, T., Guijarro-Fuentes, P., & Rothman, J. (2008). Adult accessibility to L2 representational features: Evidence from the Spanish DP. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected proceedings of Second Language Research Forum 2007 (pp. 1–21). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998a). Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1–26.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359–375.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp. 178–192). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, R., & Wexler, K. (1987). Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 413–444.Google Scholar
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B., & Clashen, H. (2004). On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Linguistics, 42(3), 669–705.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penner, Z. (1993). The earliest stage in the acquisition of the nominal phrase in Bernese Swiss German: syntactic bootstrapping and the architecture of language learning (Arbeit-spapier 30). Bern: University of Bern.Google Scholar
Penner, Z., & Schönenberger, M. (1992). The distribution of nominal agreement features in Swiss-German dialects and the strong DP/CP parallelism hypothesis. In Z. Penner (Ed.), Topics in Swiss grammar syntax (pp. 331–346). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. C. (1991). Nominals and nominaliziation in Catalan. Probus, 3, 279–316.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, E. (1991). Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. Syntax and Semantics, 26, 37–62.Google Scholar
Roehrs, D. (2006). The morpho-syntax of the Germanic noun phrase: Determiners Move into the determiner phrase (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., Iverson, M., Judy, T., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2009). Noun-raising and adjectival interpretative reflexes in the L2 Spanish of Germanic and Italian learners. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G. M. Rheiner (Eds.), BUCLD 33: Proceedings of the 33rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 444–455). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2012). Acquisition of temporal meanings without temporal morphology: The case of Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA) conference, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA.
(2013). What is easy and what is hard in second language acquisition: A generative perspective. In M. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez-Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 46(4), 543–559.Google Scholar
(2016). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valois, D. (1991). The internal syntax of DP (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, LA.Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar