Chapter published in:
Lost in Transmission: The role of attrition and input in heritage language development
Edited by Bernhard Brehmer and Jeanine Treffers-Daller
[Studies in Bilingualism 59] 2020
► pp. 198228
References

References

Aissen, J.
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S.
2000A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics 38(3): 483–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M.
1990Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Avrutin, S.
2004Optionality in child and aphasic speech. Lingue e Linguaggio 1: 67–89.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bader, M. & Häussler, J.
2010Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics 46: 273–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bamyacı, E.
2016Competing Structures in the Bilingual Mind: A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Optional Verb Number Agreement. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bamyacı, E., Häussler, J. & Kabak, B.
2014The interaction of animacy and number agreement: An experimental investigation. Lingua 148: 254–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bard, E. G., Robertson, D. & Sorace, A.
1996Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72: 32–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B.
2012lme4 Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes (R Package Version 0.999999–0). http://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/lme4​/index​.html
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S. & Polinsky, M.
2013Heritage languages and their speakers: opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39(3–4): 129–181.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, C. N. Li (ed), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1990Uses of the defocusing pronominal prefixes in Caddo. Anthropological Linguistics 32: 57–68.Google Scholar
1994Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
2000Number. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
1990Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
de Groot, C.
2005The grammars of Hungarian outside Hungary from a linguistic-typological perspective. In Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 20], A. Fenyvesi (ed.), 351–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Döpke, S.
1998Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Child Language 25: 555–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erguvanlı, E. E.
1984The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
1983The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. A. & Van Valin, R. D.
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1983Topic continuity in discourse: The functional domain of switch-reference. In Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2], J. Haiman & P. Munro (eds), 51–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.
2005Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P. & Smith, J. H.
1976The Structure of Communication in Early Language Development. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gürel, A.
2004Selectivity in L2-induced L1 attrition: a psycholinguistic account. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17: 53–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, A. & Schaeffer, J.
2007Subject realization in early Hebrew-English bilingual acquisition: The role of cross-linguistic influence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(3): 333–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haig, G.
1997On some strategies for case recovery in Turkish relativization. In The Mainz Meeting: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, August 3 – 6, 1994, L. Johanson (ed.), 299–320. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
2011Occurrence of nominal plurality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. Haspelmath (ed), 142–145. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hoop, H. & Krämer, I.
2006Children’s optimal interpretations of indefinite subjects and objects. Language Acquisition 13(2): 103–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
2004Syntax and its interfaces in L2 grammars: situating L1 effects. In Proceedings of GALA (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition) 2003 [LOT Occasional Series 3], J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (eds), 211–222. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Huang, Y.
2000Anaphora: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. & Müller, N.
2000Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3(3): 227–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. & Comrie, B.
1981Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B.
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J.
1997Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T.
2014Adjective placement in simultaneous bilinguals (German-Italian) and the concept of cross-linguistic overcorrection. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17: 222–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. & Rothman, J.
2018Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5): 564–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.
2003Dissociations among functional categories in Korean agrammatism. Brain and Language 84: 170–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
2005Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research 21(3): 199–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. & Hulk, A.
2001Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. & Navarro, S.
2003Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language 30(2): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, T. & Tsimpli, I.
2005‘Real’ and apparent optionality in second language grammars: Finitness and pronouns in null operator structures. Second Language Research 21(3): 250–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, C.
1999The vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language 77: 364–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Multiple interfaces. In Cognitive Interfaces: Constraints on Linking Cognitive Information, E. van der Zee & U. Nikanne (eds), 21–53. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M.
1997Cross-linguistic parallels in language loss. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 14(1–2): 87–123.Google Scholar
2011Reanalysis in adult heritage language: A case for attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, E. F.
1981Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed.), 223–233. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2012R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rising, D. P.
1992Switch Reference in Koasati Discourse. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. R.
1987Amele. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1997Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: A preliminary survey. In Papers in Papuan Linguistics 3, A. Pawley (ed.), 101–241. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. & Treffers-Daller, J.
2014A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics 35(1): 93–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, C.
1999The Turkish Nominal Phrase in Spoken Discourse. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. & Paoli, S.
2004Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(3): 183–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sezer, E.
1978Eylemlerin çoğul öznelere uyumu. Genel Dilbilim Dergisi 1: 25–32.Google Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M. & Truscott, J.
2014The Multilingual Mind: A Modular Processing Perspective. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
1999Initial states, end states and residual optionality in L2 acquisition. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 666–674. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2000Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research 16(2): 93–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Keller, F.
2005Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115(11): 1497–1524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L.
2009Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 195–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. & Sorace, A.
2006Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. 2, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 653–664. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F.
2004First language attrition and syntactic subjects: a study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism 8(3): 257–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M.
2009The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure and Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Subject positions and information structure: The effect of frequency on acquisition and change. Studia Linguistica 3: 299–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westfall, P., Tobias, R. & Wolfinger, R.
2011Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using SAS, 2nd edn. Cary NC: SAS Publishing.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M.
1999Animacy and Reference: A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, B.
2010Domain-wide or variable-dependent vulnerability of the semantics-syntax interface in L2 acquisition? Evidence from wh-words used as existential polarity words in L2 Chinese grammars. Second Language Research 26(2): 219–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Krause, Elif & Leah Roberts
2020.  In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26],  pp. 313 ff. Crossref logo
Krause, Elif & Leah Roberts
2020.  In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26],  pp. 313 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.