Chapter published in:
Studies in Turkish as a Heritage Language
Edited by Fatih Bayram
[Studies in Bilingualism 60] 2020
► pp. 207–228

Perceived global accent in Turkish heritage speakers in Germany

The impact of exposure and use for early bilinguals

| University of Konstanz | UiT The Arctic University of Norway
| University of Konstanz
| University of Hamburg
This chapter is concerned with Turkish heritage speakers (HSs) in Germany, here exemplified by 21 early bilinguals during adulthood who live in Hamburg, North Germany. We introduce the population, report their self-perceived proficiency and propose the Turkish Use Score (TUS) that is based on quantitative aspects of language use (e.g., the number of people Turkish is spoken with) and qualitative ones (e.g., schooling in Turkish). In the remainder of the paper, we focus on the perceived accent of these speakers in German and Turkish, discussing the role of Age of Onset (AoO) in German vs. amount of Turkish use. The results show a strong correlation between Turkish use and perceived nativeness in Turkish, while no role of AoO is evident for accent in either language. Our data further suggested a weak (but non-significant) relation between high Turkish use and sounding more foreign in German.
Keywords: Age of onset, language use, language exposure, foreign accent, simultaneous bilingual
Published online: 18 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.60.09kup
References

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K.
(2008) The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in L2: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D.
(1999) Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B., Yao, Y., Haynes, E. F., & Rhodes, R.
(2011) Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 3964–3980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Schmid, M., & Mennen, I.
(2010) Perception of foreign accent in native speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(1), 33–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching and Research, 42(4), 476–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. P.
(2005) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E.
(1987) A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 8, 162–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T.
(1997) Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I.
(1995) Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, Yeni-Komshian G., & Liu, S.
(1999) Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C., & Rato, A.
(2016) Global accent in the Portuguese speech of heritage returnees. Journal of Heritage Language, 13, 161–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Godson, L.
(2004) Vowel production in the speech of Western Armenian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Hosodam, M., & Stone-Romero, E.
(2008) The effects of foreign accent on employment-related decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(2), 113–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunn, K.
(2005) „Nächstes Jahr kehren wir zurück …“: Die Geschichte der türkischen Gastarbeiter in der Bundesrepublik. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Jaspaert, K., & Kroon, S.
(1989) Social determinants of language loss by Italians in the Netherlands. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 90, 77–96.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M.
(2018) The development of rhotics: A comparison of monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 710–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, M., Lleó, C., & Rakow, M.
(2004) Voice onset time in bilingual German-Spanish children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(1), 71–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Lleó, C.
(2016) Voice Onset Time in German-Italian simultaneous bilinguals: Evidence on crosslanguage influence and markedness. In M. Yavaş, M. Kehoe, & W. Cardoso (Eds.), Romance-Germanic bilingual phonology (pp. 79–98). Leeds: Equinox.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Klaschik, E., Lein, T., Stangen, I., & Van de Weijer, J.
(2014) Foreign accent in adult simultaneous bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal, 11(2), 123–150.Google Scholar
Lein, T., Kupisch, T., & Van de Weijer, J.
(2016) Voice onset time and global foreign accent in German-French simultaneous bilinguals during adulthood. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(6), 732–749. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C.
(2018) Aspects of the phonology of Spanish as a heritage language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 732–747. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lleó, C., Kuchenbrandt, I., Kehoe, M., & Trujillo, C.
(2003) Syllable final consonants in Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual acquisition. In N. Müller (Ed.), (Non)vulnerable domains in bilingualism (pp. 191–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, A., Gyllstad, H., & Kupisch, T.
(2017) Transfer into L3 English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(2), 131–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lukyanchenko, A., & Gor, K.
(2011) Perceptual correlates of phonological representations in heritage speakers and L2 learners. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 414–426). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacKay, I., Meador, D., & Flege, E.
(2001) The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 58, 103–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.
(2018) Early child second language acquisition: French gender in German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 656–673. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M.
(2009) Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 28(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
(2011) First and Second Language Acquisition: Parallels and Differences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J.
(2003) A primer on accent discrimination in the Canadian context. TESL Canada Journal, 20(2), 38–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oh, J., Jun, S., Knightly, L., & Au, T.
(2003) Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition, 86, 53–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, E.
(2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29, 191–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saddah, E.
(2011) The production of Arabic vowels by English L2 learners and heritage speakers of Arabic (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Scovel, T.
(2000) A critical review of critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stangen, I., Kupisch, T., Proietti Ergün, A. L., & Zielke, M.
(2015) Foreign accent in heritage speakers of Turkish in Germany. In H. Peukert (Ed.), Transfer effects in multilingual development (pp. 87–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wiese, H.
(2012) Kiezdeutsch: Ein neuer Dialekt entsteht. München: C. H. Beck. CrossrefGoogle Scholar