Part of
Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten
Edited by Michael J. Leeser, Gregory D. Keating and Wynne Wong
[Studies in Bilingualism 62] 2021
► pp. 2752
Aissen, J.
(2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.
(2013) Random-effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belloro, V. A.
(2015) To the right of the verb: An investigation of clitic doubling and right dislocation in three Spanish dialects. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bossong, G.
(1991) Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner & D. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cedrus Corporation
(1992) SuperLab (Version 4.0.5). San Pedro, CA.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar
Company Company, C.
(2006) El objeto indirecto. In C. Company Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española [Historical syntax of the Spanish language] (pp. 477–572). Mexico City, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Cuervo, M. C.
(2003) Structural asymmetries but same word order: The dative alternation in Spanish. In A. M. DiSciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry in grammar (pp. 117–144). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S., Bartke, S., & Clahsen, H.
(2006) Structural and lexical case in child German: Evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Language Acquisition, 13, 3–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V.
(2009) Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 33, 832–884. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A.
(2013) Differential object marking in Spanish: State of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2, 1–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, J.
(2000) Agreement as a continuum: The case of Spanish pronominal clitics. In F. Beukem & M. den Dikken (Eds.), Clitic phenomena in European languages (pp. 147–190). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García García, M.
(2005) Differential object marking and informativeness. In K. von Heusinger, G. A. Kaiser, & E. Stark (Eds.), Proceedings from the workshop “Specificity and the Evolution/Emergence of Nominal Determination in Romance” (pp. 17–31). Konstanz, Germany: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J.
(2000) The formal semantics of clitic doubling. Journal of Semantics, 16, 315–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2006) Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22, 369–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H., & León Arriaga, M.
(2016) Structural and inherent case in the non-native processing of Spanish: Constraints on inflectional variability. Second Language Research, 32, 75–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. N., & Van Hell, J. G.
(2011) The effects of L2 proficiency level on the processing of wh-questions among Dutch second language speakers of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49, 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F.
(2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J.
(2014) Self-paced reading. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 20–49). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) The processing of case in near-native Spanish. Second Language Research, 31, 281–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Number attraction effects in near-native Spanish sentence comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) The processing of the object marker a by heritage Spanish speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22, 585–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J., & Fernández Cuenca, S.
(2018, October). Lexical access and morphosyntactic processes in the online sentence comprehension of second language learners of Spanish. Paper presented at the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Keating, G. D., & Jegerski, J.
(2015) Experimental designs in sentence processing research: A methodological review and user’s guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2014) lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). Available at [URL]
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M.
(2019) emmeans (Version estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. Available at [URL]
Montrul, S.
(2005) Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21, 199–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) La marcación diferencial del objeto directo en el español de Argentina: Un estudio experimental [Differential object marking in Argentine Spanish: An experimental study]. In L. Colantoni & C. Rodriguez-Louro (Eds.), Perspectivas teóricas y experimentales sobre el español de la Argentina [Theoretical and experimental perspectives on Argentine Spanish] (pp. 207–228). Frankfurt, Germany/Madrid, Spain: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
(2014) Structural changes in Spanish in the United States: Differential object marking in Spanish heritage speakers across generations. Lingua, 151B, 177–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Sánchez-Walker, N.
(2013) Incomplete acquisition of differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, W.
(2003) The radical middle: Nativism with Universal Grammar. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 19–42). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(2007) Processibility theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española
(2019) Uso de los pronombres lo(s), la(s), le(s). Leísmo, laísmo, loísmo [Use of the pronouns lo. lo(s), la(s), le(s). Leismo, laísmo, loísmo]. Retrieved from [URL]
R Development Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at [URL]
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J.
(2013) Processing of gender and number agreement in late Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17, 607–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M.
(1988) The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 391–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., & Bulkes, N. Z.
(2015) Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 1753–1763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tight, D.
(2012) The first noun principle and ambitransitive verbs. Hispania, 95, 103–115.Google Scholar
Torrego, E.
(1998) The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(2009) Processing matters in input enhancement. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters (pp. 57–61). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2015) Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp.113–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, K., & Kaiser, G. A.
(2011) Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology, 21, 593–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K.
(2002) The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar