Cover not available
Part of
Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten
Edited by Michael J. Leeser, Gregory D. Keating and Wynne Wong
[Studies in Bilingualism 62] 2021
► pp. 53–124

Chapter 3
The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish

An examination of L2 learners’ use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns

| University of Central Arkansas
A vital part of understanding language is linking referring expressions to the appropriate antecedents. In null subject languages like Spanish, person-number inflections on verbs are essential to ensuring the appropriate connections are made. However, second language (L2) learners have limited processing capabilities (VanPatten, 1996, 2015), and may rely on strategies that steer them away from inflections. The current study examines whether first language English/L2 Spanish learners process verb inflections that signal subject shifts or if they prefer to process lexical items (i.e., overt subjects) as predicted by VanPatten’s lexical preference principle. The results of this study indicate that non-natives do not rely on inflections to link antecedents and referring expressions, and that L2 processing is facilitated by overt subject pronouns.
Keywords: L2 processing, null subjects, overt subjects, verbal morphology, L2 reading, input processing, lexical preference principle
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background and motivation
    • Subject shifts in Spanish
    • Processing strategies in L2 acquisition
    • Research questions
  • Method and procedure
    • Participants
      • Non-native speakers
      • Native speakers
    • Materials
      • Subject shift stimuli
      • Test of inflectional morphology
    • Procedure
    • Scoring and analysis
    • Coding scheme for linear mixed models
  • Results
    • Native speakers
      • Results of inflectional morphology
        • 1sg/3sg condition
        • 2sg/3pl condition
      • Subject shift stimuli
        • 1sg/3sg condition
        • 2sg/3pl condition
    • Non-native speakers
      • Test of inflectional morphology
        • 1sg/3sg condition
        • 2sg/3pl condition
      • Subject shift stimuli
        • 1sg/3sg condition
        • 2sg/3pl condition
    • Summary of results
  • Discussion
  • Limitations and future research
  • Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.62.03joh
References (49)
References
Al-Kasey, T., & Pérez-Leroux, A. T. (1998). Second language acquisition of Spanish null subjects. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 161–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2002). Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 14, 151–170.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing NP antecedents. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ballester, E. P. (2013). Adult L2 Spanish development of syntactic and discourse subject properties in an instructional setting. RAEL: Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 12, 111–129.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2003). The (dis)association between morphology and syntax: The case of L2 Spanish. In S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages (pp. 398–417). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Carminati, M. N. (2002). The processing of Italian subject pronouns (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
(2005). Processing reflexes of the feature hierarchy (Person > Number > Gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua, 115, 259–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved from Council of Europe Portal: <[URL]>
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010). Learned attention effects in L2 temporal reference: The first hour and the next eight semesters. Language Learning, 60, 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filiaci, F. (2010). Null and overt subject biases in Spanish and Italian: A cross-linguistic comparison. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 171–182). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Filiaci, F., Sorace, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 825–843.Google Scholar
García-Alcaraz, E., & Bel, A. (2014). The acquisition of co-referential properties of pronouns in bilingual and L2 Spanish speakers. In E. Grillo, K. Jepson, & M. LaMendola (Eds.), Online proceedings supplement of the 39th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 1–9). Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gelormini-Lezama, C. (2018). Exploring the repeated name penalty and the overt pronoun penalty in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 377–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelormini-Lezama, C., & Almor, A. (2011). Repeated names, overt pronouns, and null pronouns in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 437–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Singular and plural pronominal reference in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, 299–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Gudmestad, A. (2008). Variable subject expression in second-language Spanish: A comparison of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 69–85). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: The functional domain of switch reference. In J. Haiman & P. Munro (Eds.), Switch reference and universal grammar (pp. 51–81). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glass, W. R., & Perez-Leroux, A. T. (1998). A parametric interpretation of learners’ errors: The acquisition of Spanish null subjects. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 16(28), 27–46.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gürel, A. (2006). L2 acquisition of pragmatic and syntactic constraints in the use of overt and null subject pronouns. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development (pp. 259–282). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. D. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J. (2001). Missing inflection in second language French: Accidental infinitives and other verbal deficits. Second Language Research, 17, 273–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 21, 250–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D. (2009). Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59, 503–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D., Jegerski, J., & VanPatten, B. (2016). Online processing of subject pronouns in monolingual and heritage bilingual speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 36–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–129). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2007). Acquiring (or assembling) functional categories in second language acquisition. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (pp. 233–244). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mandell, P. (2013). Do L2 Spanish learners attend to verb morphology? The TFLTA Journal, 4, 20–28.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2008). How pragmatically odd!: Interface delays and pronominal subject distribution in L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1, 317–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 951–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2007a). On parameter clustering and resetting the null-subject parameter in L2 Spanish: Implications and observations. Hispania, 90, 328–341.Google Scholar
(2007b). The syntax of null subjects in L2 Spanish: Comparing two L2 populations under different exposure. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 20, 185–216.Google Scholar
Shin, N. L., & Cairns, H. S. (2012). The development of NP selection in school-age children: Reference and Spanish subject pronouns. Language Acquisition, 19, 3–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. (2003). ‘Pragmatic weight’ and face: Pronominal presence and the case of the Spanish second person singular subject pronoun tú. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 191–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 143–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1984). Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57–68.Google Scholar
(1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 113–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Keating, G. D. (2007, April). Getting tense. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Costa Mesa, CA.
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Leeser, M. J. (2012). Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem: Evidence from self-paced reading. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 109–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar