Chapter published in:
Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten
Edited by Michael J. Leeser, Gregory D. Keating and Wynne Wong
[Studies in Bilingualism 62] 2021
► pp. 261294
References
Benati, A.
(2001) A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benati, A. G., & Lee, J. F.
(2008a) From processing instruction on the acquisition of Italian noun-adjective agreement to secondary transfer-of-training effects on Italian future tense verb morphology. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects (pp. 88–120). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J. F., & Hikima, N.
(2010) Exploring the effects of processing instruction on a discourse level interpretation tasks with the Japanese passive. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 148–177). London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J. F., & Houghton, D.
(2008) From processing instruction on the acquisition of English past tense to secondary transfer-of-training effects on English third person singular present tense. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects (pp. 88–120). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J. F., & Laval, C.
(2008) From processing-instruction on the acquisition of French imparfait to secondary transfer-of-training effects on French subjunctive and to cumulative transfer-of-training effects with French causative constructions. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects (pp. 121–157). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T.
(1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bladie, B.
(1976) The acquisition of the passive voice. Journal of Child Language, 3, 331–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T.
(1995) Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 179–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comer, W. J., & deBenedette, L.
(2010) Processing instruction and Russian: Issues, materials, and preliminary experimental results. Slavic and East European Journal, 54, 118–146.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.
(2007) The associative-cognitive creed. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories of second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y.
(2000) The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Issa, B., & Morgan-Short, K.
(2019) Effects of external and internal attentional manipulations on second language grammar development: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 389–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Issa, B., Morgan-Short, K., Villegas, B., & Raney, G.
(2015) An eye tracking study on the role of attention and its relationship with motivation. In L. Roberts, K. McManus, N. Vanek, & D. Trenkic (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook, (pp. 114–142). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ito, K., & Wong, W.
(2019) Processing instruction and the effects of input modality and voice familiarity on the acquisition of the French causative construction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 443–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F.
(2015) Processing instruction on the Spanish passive with transfer-of-training effects to anaphoric and cataphoric reference contexts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 203–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S.
(2019) Native and nonnative processing of active and passive sentences: The effects of processing instruction on the allocation of visual attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 853–879. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. J., & DeMil, A. J.
(2013) Investigating the secondary effects of processing instruction in Spanish: From instruction on accusative clitics to transfer-of-training effects on dative clitics. Hispania, 96, 748–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Wong, A. M.-Y., Deevy, P., Stokes, S. F., & Fletcher, P.
(2006) The production of passives by children with specific language impairment acquiring English or Cantonese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 267–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. M., Mack, J. E., & Thompson, C. K.
(2012) Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 31–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienneman, M.
(2007) Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 141–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Qin, J.
(2008) The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on the acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12, 61–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A.
(2002) E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.
(1966) Grammatical transformations in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 219–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D., & Zurif, E.
(1995) Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language, 50, 225–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uludag, O., & VanPatten, B.
(2012) The comparative effects of processing instruction and dictogloss on the acquisition of the English passive by speakers of Turkish. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 50, 189–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
(1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Wong, W.
(2004) Processing instruction and the French causative: A replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(2015a) Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp.113–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015b) Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53, 91–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, J. P.
(2015) Primary and secondary effects of processing instruction on Spanish clitic pronouns. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 151–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, J. P., & DeMil, A. J.
(2013a) Primary and secondary effects of PI. International Journal of Language Studies, 7, 59–88.Google Scholar
(2013b) Transfer-of-training effects in processing instruction: The role of form-related explicit information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 519–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W.
(2004) The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wong, W., & Ito, K.
(2018) The effects of processing instruction and traditional instruction on L2 online processing of the causative construction in French: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 241–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar