Chapter published in:
Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten
Edited by Michael J. Leeser, Gregory D. Keating and Wynne Wong
[Studies in Bilingualism 62] 2021
► pp. 328356
References

References

Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y.
(1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G., & McElree, B.
(1988) Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35–43.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 693–706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R.
(2010) Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J., & Gerfen, C.
(2014) Visual world eye-tracking. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 93–126). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. B.
(2018) Doing psychological science by hand. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 315–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N.
(2010) MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. B., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. A.
(2011) Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., Kim, S. K., Choo, H., Ghio, A., Herschensohn, J., & Koh, S.
(2019) Look and listen!: The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34, 385–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A. J.
(2017) Coreference and discourse coherence in L2: The roles of grammatical aspect and referential form. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7, 199–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hehman, E., Stolier, R. M., & Freeman, J. B.
(2014) Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 384–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henry, N.
(2015) Morphosyntactic processing, cue interaction, and the effects of instruction: An investigation of processing instruction and the acquisition of case markings in L2 German (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.Google Scholar
Huettig, F., & Mani, N.
(2016) Is prediction necessary to understand language?: Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 19–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S.
(2011) Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137, 151–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Issa, B. I.
(2019) Examining the relationships among attentional allocation, working memory, and second language development. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 464–479). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Issa, B. I., & Morgan-Short, K.
(2019) Effects of external and internal attentional manipulations on second language grammar development: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 389–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Issa, B., Morgan-Short, K., Villegas, B., & Raney, G.
(2015) An eye-tracking study on the role of attention and its relationship with motivation. EuroSLA Yearbook, 15, 114–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, K., & Wong, W.
(2019) Processing instruction and the effects of input modality and voice familiarity on the acquisition of the French causative construction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 443–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G.
(2018) Morphological priming in bilingualism research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 443–447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J.
(2014) Self-paced reading. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 20–49). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., & VanPatten, B.
(2014) Research methods in second language psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Wooley, J. D.
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E.
(2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 257–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D.
(2014) Eye-tracking with text. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 69–92). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kieslich, P. J., & Henninger, F.
(2017) Mousetrap: An integrated, open-source mouse-tracking package. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1652–1667. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kieslich, P. J., Schoemann, M., Grage, T., Hepp, J., & Scherbaum, S.
(2020) Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference? Behavior Research Methods, 52, 317-341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F.
(2016) What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 32–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S.
(2019a) Native and nonnative processing of active and passive sentences: The effects of processing instruction on the allocation of visual attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 853–879. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019b) The effects of implicit positive and negative feedback on processing subsequent linguistic target items. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 361–374). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B.
(2003) Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Leeser, M. J.
(2014) On psycholinguistic methods. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 231–251). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Love, T., & Swinney, D.
(1996) Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 5–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luck, S. J.
(2014) An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T.
(2018) Cross-modal priming in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 456–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milin, P., Smolka, E., & Feldman, L. B.
(2018) Models of lexical access and morphological processing. In E. M. Fernández & H. Smith Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 240–268). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. C.
(2004) On-line methods in language processing: Introduction and historical overview. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Mitsugi, S.
(2017) Incremental comprehension of Japanese passives: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 953–983. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitsugi, S., & MacWhinney, B.
(2016) The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 19–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., & Tanner, D.
(2014) Event-related potentials (ERPs). In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 127–152). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nicol, J. L., & Swinney, D.
(1989) The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K.
(1978) Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 618–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L.
(2014) Cross-modal priming with sentences. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 212–230). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P.
(2008) Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stillman, P. E., Shen, X., & Ferguson, M. J.
(2018) How mouse-tracking can advance social cognitive theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 531–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D.
(1979) Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D., & Prather, P.
(1989) On the comprehension of lexical ambiguity by young children: Investigations into the development of mental modularity. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), Resolving semantic ambiguity (pp. 225–238). New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traxler, M. J.
(2012) Introduction to psycholinguistics: Understanding language science. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(2002) Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755–803. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 115–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2015a) Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 113–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015b) Foundations of processing instruction. IRAL, 53, 91–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020). Input processing in adult L2 acquisition. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff Eds. Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction 3rd ed. pp. 105 127 New York, NY Routledge
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, C.
(1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 225–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Smith, M.
(2015) Aptitude as grammatical sensitivity and the initial stages of learning Japanese as a L2: Parametric variation and case marking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 135–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W.
(2004) The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wong, W., & Ito, K.
(2018) The effects of processing instruction and traditional instruction on L2 online processing of the causative construction in French: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 241–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, D. W., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Kieslich, P. J., Henninger, F., & Schulte-Mechlenbeck, M.
(2019) Mouse-tracking: Detecting types in movement trajectories. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kuehberger, & J. G. Johnson (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods (2nd ed.) (pp. 131–145). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar