References
Arnott, D. W.
(1967) Some reflections on the content of individual classes in Fula and Tiv. In M. André (Ed.), La classification nominale dans les langues négro-africaines (pp. 45–74). Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D.
Ayoun, D., & Maranzana, S.
(2020) Italian grammatical gender: A corpus study from a second language perspective. Italica, 97(2), 306–333.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J.
(1973) Does sex-biased job advertising aid and abet sex discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(1), 6–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breedveld, J. O.
(1995) Form and meaning in Fulfulde: A morphophonological study of Maasinankoore. Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Chestnut, E. K., & Markman, E. M.
(2018) “Girls are as good as boys at math” implies that boys are probably better: A study of expressions of gender equality. Cognitive Science, 42, 2229–2249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1999) Grammatical gender systems: A linguist’s assessment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 457–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
(1991) Gender. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2014) The expression of gender. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Curzan, A.
(2003) Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuza, A., & Perez-Tattam, R.
(2015) Grammatical gender selection and phrasal word order in child heritage Spanish: A feature re-assembly approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 332–350.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
Deutsch, A., & Dank, M.
(2009) Conflicting cues and competition between notional and grammatical factors in producing number and gender agreement: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 112–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Garbo, F., Olsson, B., & Wälchli, B.
(Eds) (2019) Grammatical gender and linguistic complexity, Vol. I: General issues and specific studies. Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Ecke, P.
(2015) Parasitic vocabulary acquisition, cross-linguistic influence, and lexical retrieval in multilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 145–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, A., Gudmestad, A., & Metzger, T.
(2020) A longitudinal study of grammatical gender marking in French as an additional language. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 733–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbert, S. H., & Pukui, M. K.
(1979) Hawaiian Grammar. University of Hawai’i Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foundalis, H. E.
(2002) Evolution of gender in Indo-European languages. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 24.Google Scholar
Hager, M.
(2014) Der Genuserwerb bei mehrsprachig aufwachsenden Kindern. Bergische Universität Wuppertal.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W.
(1991) The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1), 27–62.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R.
(2001) Hungarian. In J. Garry & C. Rubino (Eds.), Facts about the world’s languages. An encyclopedia of the world’s languages: Past and present (pp. 314–316). H. W. Wilson.Google Scholar
Jahr, E. H.
(1998) Sociolinguistics in historical language contact: The Scandinavian languages and Low German during the Hanseatic period. In E. H. Jahr (Ed.), Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics (pp. 119–130). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D. A.
(1983) Die kognitive Organisation der Genuszuweisung zu den einsilbigen Nomen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 11(2), 166–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D.
(1984) Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, S.
(2007) Papiamento (Creole Spanish/Portuguese). In J. Holm & P. Patrick (Eds.), Comparative creole syntax (pp. 307–332). Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2008) Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohndal, T., & Westergaard, M.
(2016) Grammatical gender in American Norwegian heritage language: Stability or attrition? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K.
(2017) Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships, and language learning. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesse, A.
(2002) Språkkontakt Mellom Norsk og Tysk I Hansatidens Bergen [Language Contact between Norwegian and German in Bergen during the Hanseatic Time]. Novus.Google Scholar
Sánchez, L.
(2019) Bilingual alignments. Languages, 4(82), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Séguin, H.
(1969) Les marques du genre dans le lexique français écrit contemporain: Compilation des cas et essai de classement (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Sneddon, James N.
(1996) Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.Google Scholar
Teschner, R., & Russell, W. M.
(1984) The gender patterns of Spanish nouns: An inverse dictionary-based analysis. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 115–132.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. M., Iacobini, C., & Burani, C.
(1997) BDVDB. Una base di dati per il vocabolario di base della lingua italiana [BDVDB. A database for the basic vocabulary of Italian], (2nd ed.). Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
(2011) Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, G., Lambert, W., & Rigault, A.
(1977) The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venås, K.
(1993) On the choice between two written standards in Norway. In E. H. Jahr (Ed.), Language conflict and language planning (pp. 263–278). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubin, D., & Köpcke, K. M.
(1984) Affect classification in the German gender system. Lingua, 63, 41–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar