Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Gender: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Studies in Bilingualism 63] 2022
► pp. 4970
References
Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y.
(2008) Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1063–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abele, A. E., Uchronski, M., Suitner, C., & Wojciszke, B.
(2008) Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1202–1217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, J.
(2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arcuri, L., Maass, A., & Portelli, G.
(1993) Linguistic intergroup bias and implicit attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 277–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S.
(2000) Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakan, D.
(1966) The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bem, S.
(1993) The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J.
(1973) Does sex-biased job advertising aid and abet sex discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(1), 6–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bencivenni, N.
(1990) L’uso di categorie linguistiche in situazioni intergruppo e low impatto sulle informazioni successive [The use of linguistic categories in intergroup situations and their impact on subsequent information processing] (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Padua.Google Scholar
Beukeboom, C. J., Finkenauer, C., & Wigboldus, D. H. J.
(2010) The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 978–992. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M.
(2009) The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 19–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bundesministerium für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst
(2009) Geschlechtergerechte Stellenausschreibungen [Gender-fair job advertisements] (Unabhängiger Bericht der Gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft iS §3 Abs 5 GBK/GAW-Gesetz). Bundesministerium für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst.Google Scholar
Burgers, C. & Beukeboom, C. J.
(2016) Stereotype transmission and maintenance through interpersonal communication: The irony bias. Communication Research, 43(3): 414–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Gresta, S., Bianchi, M., Cadinu, M., & L. Arcuri
(2008) Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 839–859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A.
(1975) Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82(1): 45–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K.
(1996) The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A 49(3), 639–663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chestnut, E. K., & Markman, E. M.
(2018) “Girls are as good as boys at math” implies that boys are probably better: A study of expressions of gender equality. Cognitive Science, 42, 2229–2249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M.
(2009) Information learned from generic langauge becomes central to children’s biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations. Cognition, 113(1), 14–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The generic/nongeneric distinction influences how children interpret new information about social others. Child Development, 82(2), 471–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L.
(1997) Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P.
(2008) Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F.
(2006) At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 385–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J.
(2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esaulova, Y.
(2015) The prominence of gender information in on-line language processing: Cross-linguistic evidence of implicit gender hierarchies (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Esaulova, Y., Puebla Antunes, C., & Felser, C.
n.d.). The processing of case, word order and prominence features in German. Manuscript in preparation.
Esaulova, Y., Reali, C., & von Stockhausen, L.
(2014) Influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender during reading: Eye movements in pronominal and noun phrase anaphor resolution. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(7), 781–803. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Prominence of gender cues in the assignment of thematic roles in German. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1133–1172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esaulova, Y., & von Stockhausen, L.
(2015) Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(September), 1356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K.
(2008) Language: A toolbox for sharing and influencing social reality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 38–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K., Semin, G. R., & Finkenauer, C.
(1993) The battle of words between gender groups a language-based approach to intergroup processes. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 409–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Formanowicz, M., Roessel, J., Suitner, C. & Maass, A.
(2017) Verbs as linguistic markers of agency: The social side of grammar. European Journal of Social Psychology 47 (5): 566–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. M., & Kuhn, E. A.
(2018) Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 844–858. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, A.
(1987) Mental models as representations of discourse and text. Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Gygax, P., & Oakhill, J.
(2012) Gender representation in different languages and grammatical marking on pronouns: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics remain men. Discourse Processes, 49(6), 481–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A., Ware, E. A., & Kleinberg, F.
(2010) Effects of generic language on category content and structure. Cognitive Psychology, 61(3), 273–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C.
(2008) Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 161–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geschke, D., Sassenberg, K., Ruhrmann, G., & Sommer, D.
(2010) Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape readers’ attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology, 22(3), 99–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2000) Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Maass, A.
(2016) Advances in intergroup communication. Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., & Alkabets-Zlozover, I.
(2007) Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 153–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T.
(1998) Irony: Grade salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(2), 83–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., Robertson, D. A., Jansen, J. L., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. C.
(1999) Not propositions. Cognitive Systems Research, 1(1), 19–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gygax, P. M., Elmiger, D., Zufferey, S., Garnham, A., Sczesny, S., von Stockhausen, L., Braun, F., & Oakhill, J.
(2019) A language index of grammatical gender dimensions to study the impact of grammatical gender on the way we perceive women and men. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(July) 1604 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D. L., & Trolier, T. K.
(1986) Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 127–163). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haslanger, S.
(2011) Ideology, generics, and common ground. In C. Witt (Ed.), Feminine metaphysics: Explorations in the ontology of sex, gender, and the self (pp. 179–209). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, M., & Bierbach, C.
(1993) Eine Sprache für beide Geschlechter: Richtlinien für einen nicht-sexistischen Sprachgebrauch [A language for both genders – Guidelines for non-sexist language use]. Dt. UNESCO-Komm.Google Scholar
Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H.
(Eds) (2001–2002–2003) Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (Vols. 1, 2, 3). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodel, L., Formanowicz, M., Sczesny, S., Valdrová, J., & von Stockhausen, L.
(2017) Gender-fair language in job advertisements: A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), 384–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S.
(2016) Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 316–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irmen, L.
(2007) What’s in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(6), 431–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M. P.
(1998) The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(6), 705–752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennison, S. M., & Trofe, J. L.
(2003) Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 355–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kesebir, S.
(2017) Word order denotes relevance differences: The case of conjoined phrases with lexical gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 262–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T.
(2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, H., Sturt, P., & Garrod, S.
(2008) Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 239–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M.
(2009) Case syncretism in german feminines: Typological, functional and structural aspects. In P. O. Steinkrüger & M. Krifka (Eds.), On inflection (pp. 141–172). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Leslie, S. J.
(2014) Carving up the social world with generics. Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, 1, 208–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) ‘Hillary Clinton is the only man in the Obama administration’: Dual character concepts, generics, and gender. Analytic Philosophy, 56(2), 111–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maass, A., & Arcuri, L.
(1996) Language and stereotyping. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 193–226). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Maass, A., Corvino, P., & Arcuri, L.
(1994) Linguistic intergroup bias and the mass media. Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 31–43.Google Scholar
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R.
(1989) Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 981–993. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, R., Schul, Y., & Burnstein, E.
(2004) ‘I am not guilty’ vs ‘I am innocent’: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 433–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S.
(2012) Generic predicates and interest relativity. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 57(2), 289–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, N. K.
(2003) Agency and communion: Multifaceted or unitary constructs? (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Western University, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Misersky, J., Gygax, P. M., Canal, P., Gabriel, U., Garnham, A., Braun, F., Chiarini, T. et al.
(2014) Norms on the gender perception of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak. Behavior Research Methods, October.Google Scholar
Reali, C., Esaulova, Y., & von Stockhausen, L.
(2015) Isolating stereotypical gender in a grammatical gender language: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(4), 977–1006. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., & Tworek, C. M.
(2012) Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(34): 13526–13531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubini, M., & Semin, G. R.
(1994) Language use in the context of congruent and incongruent in-group behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 355–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwab, K., Samans, R., Zahidi, S., Leopold, T. A., & Ratcheva, V.
(2017) The global gender gap report: 2017. World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F.
(2016) Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in Psychology, 7(February). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K.
(1988) The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 558–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 58–78). Sage.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A.
(2004) Person. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C.
(2012) The electrophysiological underpinnings of processing gender stereotypes in language. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e48712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(2003) Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S.
(2007) Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N.
(2011) When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tausch, N., Kenworthy, J. B., & Hewstone, M.
(2007) The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 542–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C.
(1993) Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 528–553.Google Scholar
Valdrová, J.
(2013) Typologische Unterschiede zwischen Sprachen als Argument gegen geschlechtergerechte Sprachkritik und Sprachpflege? [Typological differences between languages as an argument against language criticism and language cultivation?]. In M. Nekula, K. Šichová, & J. Valdrová (Eds.), Bilingualer Sprachvergleich und Typologie: Deutsch – Tschechisch [Bilingual language use and typology: German – Czech] (pp. 141–158). Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Vervecken, D., Hannover, B., & Wolter, I.
(2013) Changing (s)expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 208–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villiers, J. G. de, & Tager Flusberg, H. B.
(1975) Some facts one simply cannot deny. Journal of Child Language, 2(2), 279–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Schlesewsky, M., Philipp, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I.
(2012) The role of animacy in online argument interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order, and prominence. Psycholinguistic and theoretical approaches to argument structure (pp. 91–119). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wason, P. C.
(1965) The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(1), 7–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wigboldus, D. H. J., Semin, G. R., & Spears, R.
(2000) How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 5–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wojciszke, B.
(2005) Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 155–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar