Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Gender: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Studies in Bilingualism 63] 2022
► pp. 49–70

Chapter 3
Empirical evidence for subtle gender biases in language

| University of Cologne
| University of Duisburg-Essen
This chapter presents empirical evidence from social psychological and psycholinguistic studies to provide an insight on mechanisms underlying gender inequality represented and maintained through language. The reviewed phenomena cover linguistic manifestations of gender and gender stereotypes that range from relatively superficial word semantics to gender asymmetries ingrained deeply in grammatical language systems, such as the category of verbs and the case system. The existing studies on biases in language suggest that even linguistic phenomena seemingly unrelated to gender (e.g. negations or thematic structure) may function as mechanisms supporting gender stereotypical beliefs. Such biases present a special challenge when it comes to identifying them; however, revealing their mechanisms has important implications for initiatives aiming at neutralizing their negative social consequences.
Keywords: gender, bias, gender-fair language, stereotype
Article outline
  • 1.Empirical evidence for gender biases in language
  • 2.Linguistic phenomena representing biases
    • 2.1Linguistic intergroup and expectancy bias
    • 2.2Negation bias
    • 2.3Irony bias
    • 2.4Male bias in “generic” masculine and “gender-fair” alternatives
    • 2.5Gender mismatch effects as indicators of biases
  • 3.Social agency and its linguistic representations
    • 3.1Verbs as markers of agency
    • 3.2Case syncretism
    • 3.3Thematic agents
  • 4.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 20 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.63.03esa
References (86)
References
Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J. C., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1063–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abele, A. E., Uchronski, M., Suitner, C., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1202–1217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arcuri, L., Maass, A., & Portelli, G. (1993). Linguistic intergroup bias and implicit attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 277–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bem, S. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising aid and abet sex discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(1), 6–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencivenni, N. (1990). L’uso di categorie linguistiche in situazioni intergruppo e low impatto sulle informazioni successive [The use of linguistic categories in intergroup situations and their impact on subsequent information processing] (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Padua.Google Scholar
Beukeboom, C. J., Finkenauer, C., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2010). The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 978–992. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 19–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bundesministerium für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst. (2009). Geschlechtergerechte Stellenausschreibungen [Gender-fair job advertisements] (Unabhängiger Bericht der Gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft iS §3 Abs 5 GBK/GAW-Gesetz). Bundesministerium für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst.Google Scholar
Burgers, C. & Beukeboom, C. J. (2016). Stereotype transmission and maintenance through interpersonal communication: The irony bias. Communication Research, 43(3): 414–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Gresta, S., Bianchi, M., Cadinu, M., & L. Arcuri. (2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 839–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82(1): 45–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A 49(3), 639–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chestnut, E. K., & Markman, E. M. (2018). “Girls are as good as boys at math” implies that boys are probably better: A study of expressions of gender equality. Cognitive Science, 42, 2229–2249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2009). Information learned from generic langauge becomes central to children’s biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations. Cognition, 113(1), 14–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The generic/nongeneric distinction influences how children interpret new information about social others. Child Development, 82(2), 471–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2006). At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 385–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esaulova, Y. (2015). The prominence of gender information in on-line language processing: Cross-linguistic evidence of implicit gender hierarchies (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Esaulova, Y., Puebla Antunes, C., & Felser, C. (n.d.). The processing of case, word order and prominence features in German. Manuscript in preparation.
Esaulova, Y., Reali, C., & von Stockhausen, L. (2014). Influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender during reading: Eye movements in pronominal and noun phrase anaphor resolution. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(7), 781–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Prominence of gender cues in the assignment of thematic roles in German. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1133–1172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esaulova, Y., & von Stockhausen, L. (2015). Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(September), 1356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K. (2008). Language: A toolbox for sharing and influencing social reality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, K., Semin, G. R., & Finkenauer, C. (1993). The battle of words between gender groups a language-based approach to intergroup processes. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 409–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Formanowicz, M., Roessel, J., Suitner, C. & Maass, A. (2017). Verbs as linguistic markers of agency: The social side of grammar. European Journal of Social Psychology 47 (5): 566–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. M., & Kuhn, E. A. (2018). Neutralising linguistic sexism: Promising but cumbersome? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 844–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garnham, A. (1987). Mental models as representations of discourse and text. Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Gygax, P., & Oakhill, J. (2012). Gender representation in different languages and grammatical marking on pronouns: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics remain men. Discourse Processes, 49(6), 481–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A., Ware, E. A., & Kleinberg, F. (2010). Effects of generic language on category content and structure. Cognitive Psychology, 61(3), 273–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 161–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geschke, D., Sassenberg, K., Ruhrmann, G., & Sommer, D. (2010). Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape readers’ attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology, 22(3), 99–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Maass, A. (2016). Advances in intergroup communication. Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., & Alkabets-Zlozover, I. (2007). Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T. (1998). Irony: Grade salience and indirect negation. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(2), 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., Robertson, D. A., Jansen, J. L., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (1999). Not propositions. Cognitive Systems Research, 1(1), 19–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gygax, P. M., Elmiger, D., Zufferey, S., Garnham, A., Sczesny, S., von Stockhausen, L., Braun, F., & Oakhill, J. (2019). A language index of grammatical gender dimensions to study the impact of grammatical gender on the way we perceive women and men. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(July), 1604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D. L., & Trolier, T. K. (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 127–163). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (2011). Ideology, generics, and common ground. In C. Witt (Ed.), Feminine metaphysics: Explorations in the ontology of sex, gender, and the self (pp. 179–209). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, M., & Bierbach, C. (1993). Eine Sprache für beide Geschlechter: Richtlinien für einen nicht-sexistischen Sprachgebrauch [A language for both genders – Guidelines for non-sexist language use]. Dt. UNESCO-Komm.Google Scholar
Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H. (Eds). (2001–2002–2003). Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (Vols. 1, 2, 3). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodel, L., Formanowicz, M., Sczesny, S., Valdrová, J., & von Stockhausen, L. (2017). Gender-fair language in job advertisements: A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), 384–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2016). Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 316–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irmen, L. (2007). What’s in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(6), 431–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M. P. (1998). The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(6), 705–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennison, S. M., & Trofe, J. L. (2003). Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 355–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kesebir, S. (2017). Word order denotes relevance differences: The case of conjoined phrases with lexical gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 262–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, H., Sturt, P., & Garrod, S. (2008). Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 239–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M. (2009). Case syncretism in german feminines: Typological, functional and structural aspects. In P. O. Steinkrüger & M. Krifka (Eds.), On inflection (pp. 141–172). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Leslie, S. J. (2014). Carving up the social world with generics. Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, 1, 208–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). ‘Hillary Clinton is the only man in the Obama administration’: Dual character concepts, generics, and gender. Analytic Philosophy, 56(2), 111–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maass, A., & Arcuri, L. (1996). Language and stereotyping. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 193–226). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Maass, A., Corvino, P., & Arcuri, L. (1994). Linguistic intergroup bias and the mass media. Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 31–43.Google Scholar
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 981–993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayo, R., Schul, Y., & Burnstein, E. (2004). ‘I am not guilty’ vs ‘I am innocent’: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for its encoding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 433–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S. (2012). Generic predicates and interest relativity. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 57(2), 289–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meadows, N. K. (2003). Agency and communion: Multifaceted or unitary constructs? (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Western University, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Misersky, J., Gygax, P. M., Canal, P., Gabriel, U., Garnham, A., Braun, F., Chiarini, T. et al. (2014). Norms on the gender perception of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak. Behavior Research Methods, October.Google Scholar
Reali, C., Esaulova, Y., & von Stockhausen, L. (2015). Isolating stereotypical gender in a grammatical gender language: Evidence from eye movements. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(4), 977–1006. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., & Tworek, C. M. (2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(34): 13526–13531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubini, M., & Semin, G. R. (1994). Language use in the context of congruent and incongruent in-group behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 355–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwab, K., Samans, R., Zahidi, S., Leopold, T. A., & Ratcheva, V. (2017). The global gender gap report: 2017. World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F. (2016). Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in Psychology, 7(February). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 558–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992). The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 58–78). Sage.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (2004). Person. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C. (2012). The electrophysiological underpinnings of processing gender stereotypes in language. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e48712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tausch, N., Kenworthy, J. B., & Hewstone, M. (2007). The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 542–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 528–553.Google Scholar
Valdrová, J. (2013). Typologische Unterschiede zwischen Sprachen als Argument gegen geschlechtergerechte Sprachkritik und Sprachpflege? [Typological differences between languages as an argument against language criticism and language cultivation?]. In M. Nekula, K. Šichová, & J. Valdrová (Eds.), Bilingualer Sprachvergleich und Typologie: Deutsch – Tschechisch [Bilingual language use and typology: German – Czech] (pp. 141–158). Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Vervecken, D., Hannover, B., & Wolter, I. (2013). Changing (s)expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 208–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villiers, J. G. de, & Tager Flusberg, H. B. (1975). Some facts one simply cannot deny. Journal of Child Language, 2(2), 279–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Schlesewsky, M., Philipp, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2012). The role of animacy in online argument interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order, and prominence. Psycholinguistic and theoretical approaches to argument structure (pp. 91–119). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wason, P. C. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(1), 7–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wigboldus, D. H. J., Semin, G. R., & Spears, R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 5–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 155–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kim, Jonathan, Sarah Angst, Pascal Gygax, Ute Gabriel & Sandrine Zufferey
2023. The masculine bias in fully gendered languages and ways to avoid it: A study on gender neutral forms in Québec and Swiss French. Journal of French Language Studies 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.