Article published in:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 15:1 (2018) ► pp. 103126
Referencias

[ p. 124 ]Referencias

Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel
2006Variación morfosintáctica e interacción social: Análisis del paradigma de los clíticos verbales españoles en los medios de comunicación. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
2017 “The participants as objects: Variation and meaning of first- and second-person objects in Spanish”. Studia Linguistica 71 (2): 1–37.Google Scholar
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel y María José Serrano
2010 “The cognitive bases of linguistic style”. Sociolinguistic Studies 4: 115–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Style in Syntax. Investigating Variation in Spanish Pronoun Subjects. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ardehali, Paula Elizabeth
1990 “Pronoun exchange as a barometer of social change”. Dialectal Anthropology 15: 82–86.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1990Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001 “Accessibility theory: An overview”. En Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord y Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 29–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
2000 “Mire usted Sr. González…Personal deixis in Spanish political electoral debate”. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Sociolingüística del español. Desarrollos y perspectivas en el estudio de la lengua española en contexto social. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger y Albert Gilman
1960 “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. En Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language. Cambridge: Massachussets University Press, 253–276.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick y Dominique Maingueneau
2005Diccionario de análisis del discurso. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu Editores.Google Scholar
Croft, William y Allan D. Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, Erica. C.
2009The Motivated Syntax of Arbitrary Signs: Cognitive Constraints on Spanish Clitic Clustering. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García-Miguel, José Miguel
2015 “Variable coding and object alignment in Spanish: A corpus-based approach”. Folia Linguistica 49: 205–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions: A Construction-grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. K., Hedberg, Nancy y Ron Zacharski
1993 “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”. Language 69: 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2013 “Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms”. En Dik Bakker y Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 197–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin
2010 “Reflexiones metodológicas y teóricas sobre el estudio de las formas de tratamiento en el mundo hispanoablante, a partir de una investigación en Santiago de Chile”. En Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge y María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. México: El Colegio de México, pp. 103–162.Google Scholar
[ p. 125 ]
Kendall, Martha B.
1981 “Toward a semantic approach to terms of address. A critique of deterministic models in Sociolinguistics”. Language in Communication 1 (2–3): 237–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat Orecchioni, Catherine
1992Les interactions verbales. París: A ColinGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martiny, Thierry
1996 “Forms of address in French and Dutch: a sociopragmatic approach”. Language Sciences 18 (3–4): 765–775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Medina López, Javier
2009 “El del presidente. La ruptura del rol social”. Revista Española de Lingüística 39 (1): 77–109.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin
2011 “The accountability interview, politics and change in the UK public service broadcasting”. En Mats Ekström y Marianna Patrona (Eds.), Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 33–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter y Rom Harré
1990Pronouns and People. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
NGRAE: Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua
2009Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Obeng, Samuel G.
1997 “Language and politics: indirectness in political discourse”. Discourse and Society 8 (1): 49–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto
2016 “Discourse, cognition and society”. En Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto (eds.) Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Serrano, María José
2001 “La deixis social en los usos pronominales de cortesía en español”. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 9–10: 265–280.Google Scholar
2012El sujeto pronominal usted/ustedes y su posición: variación y creación de estilos comunicativos. Spanish in Context 9 (1): 109–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “La variación sintáctica”. En Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.) Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica. Londres: Routledge, pp. 809–821.Google Scholar
2017 “Los objetos verbales de persona como variantes de tratamiento interpersonal canario en la red social Facebook”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 30 (1).Google Scholar
2018 “Going beyond address forms: Variation and style in the use of the second-person pronouns and usted ”. Pragmatics 27 (1): 87–115 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2014Person. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2006 “Image building through modality: The case of political interviews”. Discourse and Society 7(3): 389–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
1996 “Reconsidering power and distance”. Journal of Pragmatics 26:1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Miranda
2003 “ ‘Pragmatic weight’ and face: pronominal presence and the case of the Spanish second person singular pronoun tú”. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 191–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 126 ]
Watts, Richard, Sachiko, Ide y Konrad Ehrlich
1992 “Linguistic politeness and politic behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality”. En Richard Watts et al. (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2018. Not just you: The construction of radio audiences through second-person choice in Peninsular Spanish. Language & Communication 60  pp. 80 ff. Crossref logo
Serrano, María José
2021. Gradual objectivity. Variation in the use of the objectivizing second-person singular tú in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 176  pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.