La imagen constituye un fenómeno que puede abordarse desde múltiples perspectivas y que involucra distintos componentes de carácter
cognitivo, psicológico, social, cultural e interpersonal. El presente trabajo persigue un doble objetivo: por una parte, ofrecer
una definición multidimensional e interdisciplinar de la imagen que resulte aplicable al estudio de determinadas operaciones
pragmáticas, como la atenuación lingüística; por otra, establecer la relación entre género discursivo e imagen, a partir del
examen de las estrategias de atenuación en cinco géneros distintos (conversación coloquial, artículos académicos, foros en línea,
mesa redonda de expertos en TV y debates presidenciales). El análisis revela que los mecanismos lingüísticos de atenuación
constituyen índices de los atributos individuales de la imagen reclamados por los participantes en cada modalidad discursiva.
Albelda, Marta. Este volumen. “Sobre la incidencia de la imagen en la atenuación pragmática”. Spanish in Context.
Albelda, Marta, Antonio Briz, Ana Cestero, Dorota Kotwica y Cristina Villalba. 2014. “Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español. ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN”. Oralia 171: 1–44.
Argyle, Michael, Adrian Furnham y Jean Ann Graham. 1981. Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arundale, Robert B.2010. “Constituting face in conversation: face, facework, and interactional achievement”. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105.
Arundale, Robert B.2013a. “Conceptualizing ‘interaction’ in interpersonal pragmatics: Implications for understanding and research”. Journal of Pragmatics 581: 12–26.
Arundale, Robert B.2013b. “Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives”. Journal of Pragmatics 581: 108–120.
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. 2003. “Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts)”. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1453–1469.
Benet, Verónica y Niels G. Waller. 1995. “The Big Seven Factor Model for personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (4): 701–718.
Biber, Douglas y Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blake, Robert R. y Jane Mouton, 1964. The Managerial Grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Bravo, Diana. 1996. La risa en el regateo: Estudio sobre el estilo comunicativo de negociadores españoles y suecos. Stockholm: Institutionen för spanska och portugisiska.
Bravo, Diana. 1999. “¿Imagen positiva vs. Imagen negativa?: Pragmática social y componentes de face”. Oralia 21: 155–184.
Bravo, Diana. 2003. “Actividades de cortesía, imagen social y contextos socioculturales: una introducción”. En La perspectiva no etnocentrista de la cortesía: identidad sociocultural de las comunidades hispanohablantes ed. por Diana Bravo, 98–108. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Bravo, Diana. 2004. “Tensión entre universalidad y relatividad en las teorías de cortesía”. En Pragmática sociocultural: estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español ed. por Diana Bravo y Antonio Briz, 15–37. Barcelona: Ariel.
Brown, Penelope y Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Calvi, Maria Vittoria. 2010. “Los géneros discursivos en la lengua del turismo: una propuesta de clasificación”. Ibérica 191: 9–32.
Coleman, Nicole V. y Patti Williams. 2013. “Feeling like my self: Emotion profiles and social identity”. Journal of Consumer Research 40 (2): 203–222.
Cupach, William R. y Tadasu Todd Imahori. 1993. “Identity management theory: Communication competence in intercultural episodes and relationships”. En Intercultural Communication Competence ed. por Richard L. Wiseman y Jolene Koester, 112–131. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage.
Domenici, Kathy y Stephen W. Littlejohn. 2006. Facework: Bridging Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
Fant, Lars. 1992. “Scandinavians and Spaniards in negotiation”. En Culture and Management in the Field of Ethnology and Business Administration ed. por Annick Sjögren y Lena Janson, 125–153. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. Institute of International Business.
Gao, Ge. 1998. “An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for OTHER in chinese interpersonal communication”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22 (4): 467–482.
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction”. Psychiatry: Journal of the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18 (3): 213–231.
Gudykunst, William B., Yuko Matsumoto, Stella Ting-Toomey, Tsukasa Nishida, Kwangsu Kim y Sam Heyman. 1996. “The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures”. Human Communication Research 22 (4): 510–543.
Haugh, Michael. 2009. “Face and interaction”. En Face, Communication, and Social Interaction ed. por Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini y Michael Haugh, 1–30. London: Equinox.
Hernández Flores, Nieves. 2002. La cortesía en la conversación española entre familiares y amigos. La búsqueda del equilibrio entre la imagen del hablante y la imagen del destinatario. Aalborg: University of Aalborg.
Hernández Flores, Nieves. 2013. “Actividad de imagen: caracterización y tipología en la interacción comunicativa”. Pragmática Sociocultural 1 (2): 175–198.
Ho, David Yau-Fai. 1994. “Face dynamics: From conceptualization to measurement”. En The Challenge of Facework ed. por Stella Ting-Toomey, 269–285. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Holtgraves, Thomas M.2002. Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kim, Min-Sun, John E. Hunter, Akira Miyahara, Ann-Marie Horvath, Mary Bresnahan y Hei-Jin Yoon. 1996. “Individual- vs. culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles”. Communication Monographs 631: 29–49.
Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama. 1991. “Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation”. Psychological Review 98 (2): 224–253.
Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama. 1994. “A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 201: 568–579
Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama. 2010. “Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (4): 420–430.
McCrae, Robert R., y Paul Costa. 1990. Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
Miller, Lynn Carol, Michael J. Cody y Margaret L. McLaughlin. 1994. “Situations and goals as fundamental constructs”. En Handbook of Interpersonal Communication ed. por Mark L. Knapp y Gerald R. Miller, 162–197. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
Morisaki, Seiichi y William B. Gudykunst. 1994. “Face in Japan and the United States”. En The Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and Interpersonal Issues ed. por Stella Ting-Toomey, 47–94. Albany: State University of New York.
Oetzel, John. 1999. “The influence of situational features on perceived conflict styles and self-construals in work groups”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 23 (4): 679–695.
Oetzel, John, Stella Ting-Toomey, Tooko Masuoto, Yumiko Yokochi, Xiaohui Pan, Jiro Takai y Richard Wilcox. 2001. “Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States”. Communication Monographs 68 (3): 235–258.
Oyserman, Daphna. 2001. “Self-concept and identity”. En The Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology ed. por Abraham Tesser y Norbert Schwarz, 499–517. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Putnam, Linda, y Poole, Marshall S.1987. “Conflict and negotiation”. En Handbook of Organizational Communication: An interdisciplinary perspective ed. por Fredric Jablin, Linda Putnam, Karlene Roberts y Lyman Porter, 459–499. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
Rahim, Afzalur. 1983. “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict”. Academy of Management Journal 261: 368–376.
Roccas, Sonia, Lilach Sagiv, Shalom H. Schwartz y Ariel Knafo. 2002. “The Big Five personality factors and personal values”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (6): 789–801.
Sabah, Senay. 2017. “The impact of self-construal and self-concept clarity on socially motivated consumption: the moderating role of materialism”. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 271: 31–45.
Schlenker, Barry y Beth Pontari. 2000. “The strategic control of information: impression management and self-presentation in daily life”. En Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity ed. por Tesser, Abraham, Jerry M. Suls y Richard B. Felson, 199–232. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Schwartz, Shalom H.1992. “Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 251: 1–65.
Schwartz, Shalom H.2006. “A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications”. Comparative Sociology 5 (2–3): 137–182.
Schwartz, Shalom H. y Anat Bardi. 2001. “Value hierarchies across cultures. Taking a similarities perspective”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 (3): 268–290.
Schwartz, Shalom H. y Wolfang Bilsky. 1990. “Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (5): 878–891.
Simon, Bernd. 2004. Identity in modern society. A social psychological perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Singelis, Theodore M.1994. “The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 (5): 580–591.
Singelis, Theodore M. y William J. Brown. 1995. “Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior”. Human Communication Research 211: 354–389.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. “(Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships”. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–119.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. “Theories of identity and the analysis of face”. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 639–656.
Sternberg, Robert y Diane M. Dobson. 1987. “Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 521: 794–812.
Thomas, Kenneth W. y Ralph H. Kilmann, 1974. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Mountain View, Cal.: Xicom.
Thurén, Britt-Marie. 1988. Left hand left behind The changing Gender System of a Barrio in Valencia, Spain. Stockholm: Stockholms Studies in Social Anthropology.
Ting-Toomey, Stella. 1988. “Intercultural conflicts: A face-negotiation theory”. En Theories in Intercultural Communication ed. por Young Yun Kim y William B. Gudykunst, 213–235. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, Stella. 1997. “Intercultural conflict competence”. En Competence in Interpersonal Conflict ed. por William R. Cupach y Daniel J. Canary, 120–147. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ting-Toomey, Stella. 2005. “Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries”. En Theorizing about Intercultural Communication ed. por William B. Gudykunst, 211–233. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, Stella y Atsuko Kurogi. 1998. “Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 221: 187–225.
Ting-Toomey, Stella, John G. Oetzel y Kimberlie Yee-Jung. 2001. “Self-construal types and conflict management styles”. Communication Reports 14 (2): 87–104.
Triandis, Harry C.1995. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.
2022. On epistemic modality and discourse strategy: Evidence from Galician adverbs. Journal of Pragmatics 201 ► pp. 32 ff.
Albelda Marco, Marta & Maria Estellés Arguedas
2021. Mitigation revisited. An operative and integrated definition of the pragmatic concept, its strategic values, and its linguistic expression. Journal of Pragmatics 183 ► pp. 71 ff.
Escobar, Alonso & Silvana Guerrero
2021. Funciones pragmático-discursivas de oraciones escindidas del tipo “lo que pasa es que” en narraciones conversacionales de hablantes chilenos. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 9:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Figueras Bates, Carolina
2021. Mitigation in discourse: Social, cognitive and affective motivations when exchanging advice. Journal of Pragmatics 173 ► pp. 119 ff.
Albelda Marco, Marta
2020. On the Mitigating Function of the Spanish Evidential se ve que. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Figueras Bates, Carolina & Dorota Kotwica
2020. Introduction: Evidentiality, Epistemicity and Mitigation in Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kotwica, Dorota
2020. Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 219 ff.
Villalba Ibáñez, Cristina
2020. Recognising mitigation: Three tests for its identification. Journal of Pragmatics 167 ► pp. 68 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.