Article published in:
Estrategias atenuantes en géneros discursivos del español: Interfaz semántico-pragmática
Edited by Marta Albelda Marco
[Spanish in Context 15:2] 2018
► pp. 258280
Referencias

Referencias

Albelda, Marta
Este volumen. “Sobre la incidencia de la imagen en la atenuación pragmática”. Spanish in Context.
Albelda, Marta, Antonio Briz, Ana Cestero, Dorota Kotwica y Cristina Villalba
2014 “Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español. ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN”. Oralia 17: 1–44.Google Scholar
Argyle, Michael, Adrian Furnham y Jean Ann Graham
1981Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B.
2010 “Constituting face in conversation: face, facework, and interactional achievement”. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Conceptualizing ‘interaction’ in interpersonal pragmatics: Implications for understanding and research”. Journal of Pragmatics 58: 12–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives”. Journal of Pragmatics 58: 108–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
2003 “Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts)”. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1453–1469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benet, Verónica y Niels G. Waller
1995 “The Big Seven Factor Model for personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (4): 701–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas y Susan Conrad
2009Register, Genre, and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Robert R. y Jane Mouton
1964The Managerial Grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bravo, Diana
1996La risa en el regateo: Estudio sobre el estilo comunicativo de negociadores españoles y suecos. Stockholm: Institutionen för spanska och portugisiska.Google Scholar
1999 “¿Imagen positiva vs. Imagen negativa?: Pragmática social y componentes de face”. Oralia 2: 155–184.Google Scholar
2003 “Actividades de cortesía, imagen social y contextos socioculturales: una introducción”. En La perspectiva no etnocentrista de la cortesía: identidad sociocultural de las comunidades hispanohablantes ed. por Diana Bravo, 98–108. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
2004 “Tensión entre universalidad y relatividad en las teorías de cortesía”. En Pragmática sociocultural: estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español ed. por Diana Bravo y Antonio Briz, 15–37. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
[ p. 277 ]
Brown, Penelope y Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calvi, Maria Vittoria
2010 “Los géneros discursivos en la lengua del turismo: una propuesta de clasificación”. Ibérica 19: 9–32.Google Scholar
Coleman, Nicole V. y Patti Williams
2013 “Feeling like my self: Emotion profiles and social identity”. Journal of Consumer Research 40 (2): 203–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cupach, William R. y Tadasu Todd Imahori
1993 “Identity management theory: Communication competence in intercultural episodes and relationships”. En Intercultural Communication Competence ed. por Richard L. Wiseman y Jolene Koester, 112–131. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage.Google Scholar
Domenici, Kathy y Stephen W. Littlejohn
2006Facework: Bridging Theory and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fant, Lars
1992 “Scandinavians and Spaniards in negotiation”. En Culture and Management in the Field of Ethnology and Business Administration ed. por Annick Sjögren y Lena Janson, 125–153. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. Institute of International Business.Google Scholar
Gao, Ge
1998 “An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for OTHER in chinese interpersonal communication”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22 (4): 467–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giltrow, Janet y Dieter Stein
2009Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955 “On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction”. Psychiatry: Journal of the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18 (3): 213–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, William B., Yuko Matsumoto, Stella Ting-Toomey, Tsukasa Nishida, Kwangsu Kim y Sam Heyman
1996 “The influence of cultural individualism-​collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures”. Human Communication Research 22 (4): 510–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2009 “Face and interaction”. En Face, Communication, and Social Interaction ed. por Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini y Michael Haugh, 1–30. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hernández Flores, Nieves
1999 “Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversation: the case of advice”. Pragmatics 9 (1): 37–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002La cortesía en la conversación española entre familiares y amigos. La búsqueda del equilibrio entre la imagen del hablante y la imagen del destinatario. Aalborg: University of Aalborg.Google Scholar
2013 “Actividad de imagen: caracterización y tipología en la interacción comunicativa”. Pragmática Sociocultural 1 (2): 175–198.Google Scholar
Ho, David Yau-Fai
1994 “Face dynamics: From conceptualization to measurement”. En The Challenge of Facework ed. por Stella Ting-Toomey, 269–285. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas M.
2002Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kim, Min-Sun, John E. Hunter, Akira Miyahara, Ann-Marie Horvath, Mary Bresnahan y Hei-Jin Yoon
1996 “Individual- vs. culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles”. Communication Monographs 63: 29–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 278 ]
Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama
1991 “Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation”. Psychological Review 98 (2): 224–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 “A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 568–579 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (4): 420–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, Robert R., y Paul Costa
1990Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Miller, Lynn Carol, Michael J. Cody y Margaret L. McLaughlin
1994 “Situations and goals as fundamental constructs”. En Handbook of Interpersonal Communication ed. por Mark L. Knapp y Gerald R. Miller, 162–197. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.Google Scholar
Morisaki, Seiichi y William B. Gudykunst
1994 “Face in Japan and the United States”. En The Challenge of Facework: Cross-cultural and Interpersonal Issues ed. por Stella Ting-Toomey, 47–94. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Oetzel, John
1999 “The influence of situational features on perceived conflict styles and self-construals in work groups”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 23 (4): 679–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oetzel, John, Stella Ting-Toomey, Tooko Masuoto, Yumiko Yokochi, Xiaohui Pan, Jiro Takai y Richard Wilcox
2001 “Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States”. Communication Monographs 68 (3): 235–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, Daphna
2001 “Self-concept and identity”. En The Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology ed. por Abraham Tesser y Norbert Schwarz, 499–517. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Putnam, Linda, y Poole, Marshall S.
1987 “Conflict and negotiation”. En Handbook of Organizational Communication: An interdisciplinary perspective ed. por Fredric Jablin, Linda Putnam, Karlene Roberts y Lyman Porter, 459–499. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.Google Scholar
Rahim, Afzalur
1983 “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict”. Academy of Management Journal 26: 368–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Managing Conflict in Organizations (2a. edición). Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Roccas, Sonia, Lilach Sagiv, Shalom H. Schwartz y Ariel Knafo
2002 “The Big Five personality factors and personal values”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (6): 789–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabah, Senay
2017 “The impact of self-construal and self-concept clarity on socially motivated consumption: the moderating role of materialism”. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 27: 31–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Barry y Beth Pontari
2000 “The strategic control of information: impression management and self-presentation in daily life”. En Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity ed. por Tesser, Abraham, Jerry M. Suls y Richard B. Felson, 199–232. Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H.
1992 “Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25: 1–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 279 ]
2006 “A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications”. Comparative Sociology 5 (2–3): 137–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. y Anat Bardi
2001 “Value hierarchies across cultures. Taking a similarities perspective”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 (3): 268–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. y Wolfang Bilsky
1990 “Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (5): 878–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Bernd
2004Identity in modern society. A social psychological perspective.
Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Singelis, Theodore M.
1994 “The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 (5): 580–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, Theodore M. y William J. Brown
1995 “Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior”. Human Communication Research 21: 354–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2005 “(Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships”. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Theories of identity and the analysis of face”. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 639–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, Robert y Diane M. Dobson
1987 “Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 794–812.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Kenneth W. y Ralph H. Kilmann
1974Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Mountain View, Cal.: Xicom.Google Scholar
Thurén, Britt-Marie
1988Left hand left behind The changing Gender System of a Barrio in Valencia, Spain. Stockholm: Stockholms Studies in Social Anthropology.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella
1988 “Intercultural conflicts: A face-negotiation theory”. En Theories in Intercultural Communication ed. por Young Yun Kim y William B. Gudykunst, 213–235. Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage.Google Scholar
1997 “Intercultural conflict competence”. En Competence in Interpersonal Conflict ed. por William R. Cupach y Daniel J. Canary, 120–147. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
2005 “Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries”. En Theorizing about Intercultural Communication ed. por William B. Gudykunst, 211–233. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella y Atsuko Kurogi
1998 “Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22: 187–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella, John G. Oetzel y Kimberlie Yee-Jung
2001 “Self-construal types and conflict management styles”. Communication Reports 14 (2): 87–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, Harry C.
1995Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 280 ]
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Albelda Marco, Marta
2020. On the Mitigating Function of the Spanish Evidential se ve que. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Albelda Marco, Marta & Maria Estellés Arguedas
2021. Mitigation revisited. An operative and integrated definition of the pragmatic concept, its strategic values, and its linguistic expression. Journal of Pragmatics 183  pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Figueras Bates, Carolina
2021. Mitigation in discourse: Social, cognitive and affective motivations when exchanging advice. Journal of Pragmatics 173  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Figueras Bates, Carolina & Dorota Kotwica
2020. Introduction: Evidentiality, Epistemicity and Mitigation in Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kotwica, Dorota
2020. Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 169  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Villalba Ibáñez, Cristina
2020. Recognising mitigation: Three tests for its identification. Journal of Pragmatics 167  pp. 68 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.