Cover not available
Article published In:
Prosodic Issues in Language Contact Situations
Edited by Yolanda Congosto Martín and Laura Morgenthaler
[Spanish in Context 16:3] 2019
► pp. 419–437

Rhythmic variability in Spanish/English bilinguals in California

| West Virginia University

In this study two techniques were used to analyze the linguistic rhythm of Mexican Spanish/English bilinguals in Los Angeles (California): (i)-nPVI, consisting of measurements of durations of successive pairs of vowels, and (ii)-voicing ratios, consisting of a function that calculates the voiced and voiceless portions of the signal. The speech of forty-nine participants in five groups was examined: (G1)-twelve native speakers of English, (G2)-eight Mexican Sp/Eng adult bilinguals who have been in L.A. since childhood, (G3)-eleven Mexican Sp/Eng young bilinguals descendants of immigrants and born in L.A., (G4)-seven Mexican Sp/Eng adult bilinguals who moved to L.A. as adults and (G5)-eleven native speakers of Spanish who have stayed in L.A. for a short period of time. Both methodologies indicate that G1 and G2 show English-like rhythm in both languages while G4 and G5 present Spanish-like rhythm. G3 accommodates rhythm depending on the language. Results reveal how rhythm can suffer attrition and transfer processes depending on the age or length of exposure to the L2. The study also highlights the unique linguistic situation of Los Angeles where members of the Mexican community have different levels of exposure to the Spanish and English languages.

Keywords: rhythm, bilingualism, Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Participants
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Voicing ratios
      • 3.1.1Voicing ratios procedure
      • 3.1.2Voicing ratios results
    • 3.2Normalized pairwise variability index
      • 3.2.1nPVI procedure
      • 3.2.2nPVI results
    • 3.3Voicing ratios vs. nPVI: Discussion
  • 4.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00045.rob
References
Abercrombie, David
1967 Elements of General Phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Aguilar, L. Machuca
1995 “Intentionality in the speech act and phonetic reduction phenomena”. In Proceedings of XIII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul and David Weenink
2009 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.1.17) [Computer program]. Retrieved October 9, 2009, from http://​www​.praat​.org/
Brookes, Mike
2003 VOICEBOX – MATLAB Toolbox for Speech Processing. Retrieved from http://​www​.ee​.ic​.ac​.uk​/hp​/staff​/dmb​/voicebox​/voicebox​.html
Carter, Phillip M.
2005 “Quantifying Rhythmic Differences between Spanish, English, and Hispanic English.” In Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 272), ed. by Randall Gess and Edward J. Rubin, 63–75. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Phillip M. and Tonya Wolford
2016 “Cross-generational prosodic convergence in South Texas Spanish”. Spanish in Context 131: 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dasher, Richard and Dwight Bolinger
1982 “On Pre-accentual Lengthening.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 121: 58–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dauer, Richard
1983 “Stress-timing and Syllable-timing Reanalyzed.” Journal of Phonetics 111: 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dellwo, Volher, Adrian Fourcin and Evelyn Abberton
2007 “Rhythmical Classification Based on Voice Parameters”. International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS).Google Scholar
Deterding, David
2001 The Measurement of Rhythm: A Comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics 291: 217–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flor, Ashley and Amanda Bogart
2009 Second Language Rhythm. Poster presented at the University of Southern California Undergraduate Research Symposium 2009.
Fought, Carmen
2003 Chicano English in Context. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Esther and Ee Low
2002 “Durational Variability in Speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis.” In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 71, ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner, 377–401. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Brechtje Post and Ian Watson
1999 “The Acquisition of Rhythmic Patterns in English and French.” Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1201–1204. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike
2003 “Prosody in Second Language Speech Production: The Role of the Native Language.” Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen 321: 133–152.Google Scholar
Harris, Michael J. and Stefan Th. Gries
2011 “Measures of Speech Rhythm and the Role of Corpus-based Word Frequency: A Multifactorial Comparison of Spanish(-English) Speakers.” International Journal of English Studies 11(2): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 The social motivation of a sound change. In Sociolinguistic Patterns. ed. by William Labov, 1–42. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lope Blanch, Juan
1963 “Sobre las Vocales Caedizas del Español Mexicano.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 171: 1–20.Google Scholar
Low, Ee
1998 Prosodic Prominence in Singapore English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Low, Ee and Esther Grabe
1995 “Prosodic Patterns in Singapore English.” Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 31: 636–639, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Low, Ee, Esther Grabe and Francis Nolan
2000 “Quantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English.” Language and Speech 431: 377–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nava, Emily
2010 Connecting Phrasal and Rhythmic Events: Evidence from Second Language Speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Nava, Emily and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta
2009 “Order of Acquisition of Prosodic Prominence Patterns: Evidence from L1Spanish/L2English Speech.” Proceedings of the 3rd Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Erin
2008 “Correlating Speech Rhythm: Evidence from Two Peruvian Dialects.” Selected Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario (Canada): October 19–22 2006 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Perissinotto, Giorgio
1975 Fonología del Español Hablado en la Ciudad de México. Guanajuato, Mexico: El Colegio de Mexico.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1945 The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar & Paolo Roseano
(eds.) 2010 Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. Lincom Europa: München.Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck, Marina Nespor and Jaques Mehler
1999 “Correlates of Linguistic Rhythm in the Speech Signal.” Cognition 731: 265–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shousterman, Cara
2014 “Speaking English in Spanish Harlem: The Role of Rhythm”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20 (2): 157–168.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
2001 Sociolingüística y Pragmática del Español. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik
2010 Sociophonetics: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik and Phillip M. Carter
2003 “A First Look at Rhythm in Southern African American and European American English.” New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV, 32): Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
White, Laurence and Sven L. Mattys
2007 “Calibrating Rhythm: First Language and Second Language Studies.” Journal of Phonetics 351: 501–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Elordieta, Gorka & Magdalena Romera
2021. The influence of social factors on the prosody of Spanish in contact with Basque. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:1 ► pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Holliday, Nicole
2021. Prosody and Sociolinguistic Variation in American Englishes. Annual Review of Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.