Cover not available
Article published In:
Prosodic Issues in Language Contact Situations
Edited by Yolanda Congosto Martín and Laura Morgenthaler
[Spanish in Context 16:3] 2019
► pp. 475–522

Stress clash in Spanish, Catalan, and Friulian from a prosodic perspective

| Universitat de Barcelona
| University of South Africa
In several languages, two stresses cannot appear adjacently in the speech chain, and a variety of solutions have been found to be used to resolve this disfavored juxtaposition. According to various different authors, a common strategy for solving stress clash is the non-realization of the first stress and, typically, a transfer of all stress parameters to the pre-tonic syllable.
This study aims to describe how stress clash is solved in three Romance languages (Spanish, Catalan, and Friulian) and two sentence-types (broad focus statements and information-seeking yes-no questions). The first two languages behave similarly, insofar as length and loudness are not stress-supporting parameters, and F0 maintains the general patterns of the type of sentence. Friulian stands out because length is the main stress parameter and tonic syllables are significantly longer, even when there is a stress clash. F0 also follows the general sentence type pattern, with one exception: declarative sentences in NP1, where the pre-tonic syllable is always higher than its corresponding tonic.
Keywords: stress clash, deaccenting, prosody
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Corpus and speakers
    • 2.2Data analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Length
    • 3.2Loudness
    • 3.3Fundamental Frequency (F)
      • 3.3.1Spanish
      • 3.3.2Catalan
      • 3.3.3Friulian
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00048.cel
References (38)
References
Almeida, Manuel and Esteban San Juan. 2001. “Clash silábico y desplazamiento acentual en español.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental 111: 159–171.Google Scholar
Atria Lemaitre, José Joaquín. 2009. “Estrategias de resolución de choques acentuales en el castellano hablado en Santiago de Chile.” Onomázein 19(1): 11–31.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Plínio A., Paulo Arantes and L. S. Silveira. 2004. “Unifying Stress Shift and Secondary Stress Phenomena with a Dynamical Systems Rhythm Rule.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody, 23–26 March, 2004, Nara, Japan, ed. by Bernard Bel and Isabelle Marlien, 49–52. SProSIG.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta. 1983. “On rhythmic alternation.” Working Papers of the Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University 251: 35–52.Google Scholar
Contini, Michel, Jean-Pierre Lai, Antonio Romano, Stefania Roullet, Lurdes de Castro Moutinho, Rosa Lídia Coimbra, Urbana Pereira Bendiha and Suzana Secca Ruivo. 2002. “Un projet d’Atlas Multimédia Prosodique de l’Espace Roman.” In Speech Prosody 2002, ed. by Bernard Bel and Isabelle Marlien, 227–230. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, CNRS / Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Contini, Michel. 2005. “2e Séminaire international du projet AMPER.” Géolinguistique Hors Série n.3: 1–11.Google Scholar
Dorta, Josefa and Beatriz Hernández. 2007. “El choque de acentos en español.” Síntesis Tecnológica 3(2): 111–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elvira García, Wendy and Eugenio Martínez Celdrán. Submitted. “El umbral de intensidad en español.”
Fernández Planas, Ana Maria and Eugenio Martínez Celdrán. 2007. “Aspects metodològics del projecte AMPER a Espanya.” In Actes del Catorzè Col·loqui Lingüístic de la Universitat de Barcelona: Aplicacions de la fonètica, ed. by Josefina Carrera and Clàudia Pons, 187–198. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
Fernández Planas, Ana Maria. 2005. “Aspectos generales acerca del proyecto internacional AMPER en España.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental 141: 13–27.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia. 2000. Prosody and Focus in European Portuguese: Phonological Phrasing and Intonation. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Garrido, Juan María, Joaquim Llisterri, Carme de la Mota and Antonio Ríos. 1993. “Prosodic differences in reading style: Isolated vs. contextualized sentences.” In Eurospeech 1993. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Vol. 11, 573–576. Berlin.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke. 1991. A theory of stress and accent. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José I. 2006–2007. “Stress removal and stress addition in Spanish.” Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 5/61: 59–89.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2010. “ Secondary Stress and Stress Clash in Spanish .” In Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, ed. by Marta Ortega-Llebaria, 11–19. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Llisterri, Joaquim, María Jesús Machuca, Carme de la Mota, Montserrat Riera and Antonio Ríos. 2003. “Algunas cuestiones en torno al desplazamiento acentual en español.” In La tonía: dimensiones fonéticas y fonológicas, ed. by Esther, Herrera Z. and Pedro Martín Butragueño, 163–185. México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
López Bobo, María Jesús, Camen Muñiz Cachón, Liliana Díaz Gómez, Norberto Corral Blanco, David Brezmes Alonso and Mercedes Alvarellos Pedrero. 2007. “Análisis y representación de la entonación: Replanteamiento metodológico en el marco del proyecto AMPER.” In La prosodia en el ámbito lingüístico románico, ed. by Josefa Dorta and Beatriz Fernández, 17–34. Madrid: La Página Ediciones.Google Scholar
Major, Roy C. 1985. “Stress and rhythm in Brazilian Portuguese.” Language 611: 259–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás. 1918 (1971). Manual de pronunciación española. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel. 1979. “Clash avoidance in Italian.” Linguistic Inquiry 101: 467–482.Google Scholar
. 1989. “On clashes and lapses.” Phonology 61: 69–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pamies Bertrán, Antonio and Ana Maria Fernández Planas. 2006. “Sobre la percepción de la duración vocálica en español.” In Actas del V Congreso Andaluz de Lingüística General, ed. by Juan de Dios Luque Durán, 501–512. Granada: Granada Lingvistica.Google Scholar
Pamies Bertrán, Antonio, Ana Maria Fernández Planas, Eugenio Martínez Celdrán, Alicia Ortega Escandell and Mª Cruz Amorós Céspedes. 2002. “Umbrales tonales en el español peninsular.” In Actas del II Congreso de Fonética Experimental, ed. by Jesús Díaz García, 272–278. Sevilla: Laboratorio de Fonética, Facultad de Filología, Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Pamies, Antonio. 1994. “Los acentos contiguos en español.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental 61: 91–111.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Jan van Santen and Julia Hirschberg. 1995. “Pitch Downtrend in Spanish.” Journal of Phonetics 231: 445–473.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Salvador Oliva, Blanca Palmada, Pep Serra, Beatriz Blecua, Silvia Llach Victòria Oliva. 2001. “Anàlisi acústica de la resolución de xocs accentuals en català.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental 111: 11–40.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar. 2005. “Stability effects in tonal clash contexts in Catalan.” Journal of Phonetics 33(2): 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “The Intonational Phonology of Catalan.” In Prosodic Typology 2, ed. by Sun-Ah Jun, 43–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quilis, Antonio. 1993. Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Romito, Luciano and Lorenzi Marcella Giulia. 1997. “Considerazioni generali sul comportamento di alcune varietà dialettali meridionali e settentrionali rispetto all’accento intensivo.” Quaderni Del Dipartimento di lingüística dell’Università della Calábria, Serie Linguistica 61: 11–34.Google Scholar
Roseano, Paolo and Ana Maria Fernández Planas. 2013. “L’intonazione delle dichiarative neutre e delle interrogative polari in quattro varietà friulane: Agrons, Beivars, Tesis e Gradisca d’Isonzo.” Ladinia 371: 161–182.Google Scholar
Roseano, Paolo. 2012. La prosòdia del friülà en el marc de l’Atles Multimèdia de Prosòdia de l’Espai Romànic. PhD thesis, Universitat de Barcelona. [URL]
Roullet, Stephanie. 1999. “Accent et intonation dans le parler de deux villages valdôtains : Sarre et Cogne.” Géolinguistique 81: 197–235.Google Scholar
Sichel-Bazin, Rafèu, Trudel Meisenburg and Pilar Prieto. 2015. “Intonational phonology of Occitan: towards a prosodic transcription system.” In Intonation in Romance, ed. by Sónia Frota and Pilar Prieto, 198–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solé Sabater, Maria-Josep. (1984): «Experimentos sobre la percepción del acento», Estudios de Fonética Experimental, I1, pp. 131–242.Google Scholar
Toledo, Guillermo. 1998. “Prominencia melódica y temporal: La colisión acentual en español.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental 91: 201–220.Google Scholar
van Heuven, Vincent J. 1987. “Stress Patterns in Dutch (Compound) Adjectives: Acoustic Measurements and Perception Data.” Phonetica 441: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar, Francesc Ballone, Carlo Schirru and Pilar Prieto. 2015. Sardinian intonational phonology: Logudorese and Campidanese varieties. In Intonation in Romance, ed. by Sónia Frota and Pilar Prieto, 317–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Roseano, Paolo & Francesco Rodriquez
2023. Tune-text accommodation in Optimality Theory: an account of Southern Valencian Catalan yes-no questions. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.