Cover not available
Article published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 19:3 (2022) ► pp.405–431

Impact of elocution task on the measurements of rhythmic patterns in Chilean Spanish

| Universidad de Concepción
| Universidad de Concepción
| Universidad de Concepción
In this paper, we put to the test the validity of the theory of isochrony using data from Chilean Spanish. Spanish has been historically classified as syllable-timed, meaning its basic unit of prosody is the syllable. However, recent studies have shown that different methods of elicitation can have a significant effect on rhythm metrics (i.e., Arvaniti 2012). The present study measured a series of rhythm metrics from samples of 30 native Chilean Spanish speakers producing spontaneous speech and reading aloud. Using MANOVA analyses, the study determined that method of elicitation had a significant effect on the metrics: while spontaneous speech tended to produce values indicative of accent-timed rhythm, reading aloud yielded values which placed them closer to the syllable-timed rhythm category. This study helps to contribute to the notion that speech rhythm is not necessarily determined by language, but rather that there are other relevant factors.
Keywords: Spanish, Chilean Spanish, speech rhythm, theory of isochrony, accent-timed, syllable-timed
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metrics
    • 2.1Pair-Wise Variability Index
    • 2.2Percentage and standard deviation of the duration of intervals
    • 2.3Variety coefficient
    • 2.4Control Compensatory Index
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Sample and corpus
    • 3.2Signals, annotation and extraction of metrics
    • 3.3Statistical Analyses: MANOVA and post-hoc analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Analysis of CrPVI and VnPVI
    • 4.2Analysis of CCIV and CCIC
    • 4.3Analyses of ΔV, ΔC, and %V
      • 4.3.1ΔC and %V
      • 4.3.2ΔC and ΔV
      • 4.3.3ΔV and %V
    • 4.4Analysis of V% and VarcoC
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00082.lar
References (38)
References
Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2012. “The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm.” Journal of Phonetics 40 (3): 351–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bahrick, Lorraine E., and Jeffrey N. Pickens. 1988. “Classification of bimodal English and Spanish language passages by infants.” Infant Behavior and Development 11 (3): 277–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., and Jan Edwards. 1994. “Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories.” Papers in Laboratory Phonology 31: 7–33.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1989. “Reflections on the Dichotomy ‘Stress’ vs. ‘Syllable-timing’.” Revue de Phonétique Apliquée 91 (93): 99–130.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, and Chiara Bertini. 2008. “On modelling the rhythm of natural languages” In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Speech Prosody, 427–430.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2001. “Praat: a system for doing phonetics by computer.” Glot International 5 (9/10): 341–345.Google Scholar
Box, George E. 1949. “A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria.” Biometrika 36 (3/4): 317–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bray, James H., and Scott E. Maxwell. 1985. Multivariate analysis of variance (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Research Methods, Vol. 54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, Kyungmee, and John Marden. 1997. “An approach to multivariate rank tests in multivariate analysis of variance.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 92 (440): 1581–1590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dauer, Rebecca M. 1983. “Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalysed.” Journal of Phonetics 11 (1): 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. “Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm.” In Proceedings of the 11th international congress of phonetic sciences, 447–450.Google Scholar
Dellwo, Volker. 2006. “Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for ΔC.” In Language and Language Processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium, ed. by Pawe Karnowski and I. Szigeti, 231–241. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles, and Zoë Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Fox, John, Michael Friendly, and Georges Monette. 2018. heplots: Visualizing Tests in Multivariate Linear Models. R package version 1.3–5. Retrieved from [URL]
Grabe, Esther, and Ee Ling Low. 2002. “Durational Variability in Speech and the Rhythm Class Hypothesis.” In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7 1, ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner, 515–546. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamdi-Sultan, Melissa Barkat-Defradas, Emmanuel Ferragne, and Francois Pellegrino. 2004. “Speech Timing and Rhythmic Structure in Arabic Dialects: A Comparison of Two Approaches.” In Proceedings of International Speech and Communication Association 2004, 1613–1616.Google Scholar
Huberty, Carl J., and Martha D. Petoskey. 2000. “Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance.” In Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modelling, ed. by Howard E. A. Tinsley and Steven D. Brown, 183–208. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1988. “The Sacred Cows of English.” English Today 4 (4): 3–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Low, Ee Ling, Esther Grabe, and Francis Nolan. 2000. “Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English.” Language and Speech 43 (4): 377–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mairano, Paolo, and Antonio Romano. 2010. “Un confronto tra diverse metriche ritmiche usando Correlatore 1.0.” In Proceedings of the 5th AISV Congress, Zurich, Switzerland, 79–100.Google Scholar
Martínez-Celdrán, Eugenio. 2004. “Problems in the classification of approximants.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34 (2): 201–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehler, Jacques, Emmanuel Dupoux, Thierry Nazzi, and Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz. 1996. “Coping with linguistic diversity: the infant`s viewpoint.” In Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, ed. by James L. Morgan and Katherine Demuth, 101–116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina. 1990. “On the rhythm parameter in phonology.” In Logical issues in language acquisition, ed. by Iggy M. Roca, 157–175. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishihara, Tetsuo, and Jeroen Van De Weijer. 2011. “On Syllable-Timed Rhythm and Stress-Timed Rhythm in World Englishes: Revisited.” Bulletin of Miyagi University of Education 461: 155–163.Google Scholar
Nocetti, Francisco A., Hernán E. Pérez, and Mauricio Figueroa. 2019. “Estudio descriptivo y comparativo del comportamiento rítmico del habla en lectura en el español de Chile.” Logos 29 (1): 60–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, Chester L. 1979. “Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: a rejoinder to Stevens.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (6): 1350–1352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Hernán E. 2007. “Estudio de la variación estilística de la serie /b-d-g/ en posición intervocálica en el habla de los noticieros de la televisión chilena.” Estudios de fonética experimental 161: 227–259.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. 1945. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Puppel, Stanislaw. 2011. “Rhythm in Stress-timed and Syllable-timed Languages: Some General Considerations.” In Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries 11, ed. by Dieter Kastovsky and Aleksander Szwedek, 105–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck, Marina Nespor, and Jacques Mehler. 1999. “Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.” Cognition 731: 265–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Royston, J. Patrick. 1982. “Algorithm AS 181: The W test for normality.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 31 (2): 176–180.Google Scholar
Valderrama, Ricardo, Hernán E. Pérez and Darío Fuentes. 2017. “Incidencia del valor pragmático en la duración de la vocal acentuada del sufijo diminutivo -ito en el español de Chile.” Boletín de filología 52 (2): 223–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villasenor Alva, Jose A., and Elizabeth González Estrada. 2009. “A generalization of Shapiro–Wilk’s test for multivariate normality.” Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 38 (11): 1870–1883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Claudio. 2004. “El atlas lingüístico y etnográfico de Chile. Localidades y cuestionario.” Estudios Filológicos 391: 83–120Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1997. “SAMPA computer readable phonetic alphabet.” In Handbook of Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems, ed. by Dafydd Gibbon, Roger Moore and Richard Winski. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Part IV, section B.Google Scholar
White, Laurence, and Sven L. Mattys. 2007. “Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies.” Journal of Phonetics 35 (4): 501–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fullana, Natalia, Ingrid Mora-Plaza, Joan C. Mora, Miren Adrian & Gisela Sosa-López
2024. Task complexity effects on L2 speech rhythm in spontaneous speech production. Second Language Research DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.