Cover not available
Article published In:
Copulas in Spanish and Beyond
Edited by Silvia Gumiel-Molina and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
[Spanish in Context 20:2] 2023
► pp. 257–281

Estar+ILP

Testing the experiential commitment

 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
A sentence like María está muy guapa (‘María looks very pretty’) attributes the property of being pretty to María but also conveys the assumption that the state-of-affairs described is based on direct experience. Several explanatory hypotheses are found in the literature to account for this fact: (i) experientiality is a property of the copula estar; (ii) experientiality is an effect of contextual factors; and (iii) experientiality is the result of resolving the aspectual mismatch produced by combining estar with an Individual-Level Predicate (ILP). To test the predictions of these hypotheses, a comprehension-based survey was carried out. Participants were given isolated copular sentences with estar followed by either an ILP or an SLP (Stage-Level Predicate). Using a 5-point Likert scale, they had to rate how likely it was that the utterer had direct experience about the quality s/he was asserting. The results show a significant preference for the experiential interpretation in estar+ILP, an outcome that is consistent only with the hypothesis that the linguistic mismatch found in estar+ILP is enough to induce the accommodation of a direct experience presupposition.
Keywords: copulas, aspect, Individual-Level Predicates (ILPs), Stage-Level Predicates (SLPs), aspectual mismatch, direct experience, commitment, accommodation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Literature review
    • 1.2Study overview
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1General considerations
    • 4.2Specific comments
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 August 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00089.esc
References (61)
References
Arche, María. 2006. Individuals in time. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bott, Lewis, and Ira A. Noveck. 2004. “Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences.” Journal of Memory and Language 51 (3): 437–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brucart, José María. 2012. “Copular alternation in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences.” Revista de Estudos Linguisticos da Universidade do Porto 71: 9–43Google Scholar
Bylinina, Lisa. 2017. “Judge-dependence in degree constructions”. Journal of Semantics 341: 291–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José. 2012. “ Ser and estar: the individual/stage level distinction and aspectual predication.” In The Handbook of Spanish Linguistics, ed. by José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea, and Erin O’rourke, 453–476. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Greg N. 1977. Reference to kinds in English (PhD). UMass, Amherst.Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2018. “Cognitive pragmatics: Relevance-theoretic methodology.” In Methods in pragmatics, ed. by Andreas Jucker, Klaus Schneider, and Wolfram Bublitz, 185–201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, Clancy. 1988. “The semantics and pragmatics of the Spanish copula+adjective construction.” Linguistics 261: 779–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta, and Pascual José Masullo. 1999. “Los complementos predicativos”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, Vol. 21, 2461–2524, Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini, Sarah Sánchez-Alonso, and María Mercedes Piñango. 2018. “Alternative circumstances of evaluation and the ser/estar distinction in Spanish.” (lingbuzz/003543) Preprint. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti. 2002. “Coercion and the stage/individual distinction.” In From words to discourse, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 159–179. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2018a. “Evidential commitment and feature mismatch in Spanish estar constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics 1281: 102–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. “ Ser y estar con adjetivos. Afinidad y desajustes de rasgos.” Revista Española de Lingüística 481: 57–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Evidential explicatures and mismatch resolution.” In Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robin Carston, 66–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2012. “A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: properties, problems and proposals.” Borealis 1 (2): 1–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Ted. 1999. “Evidential Coercion: Using Individual-Level Predicates in Stage-Level Environments.” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 291: 43–63.Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, María Jesús. 1995. “Sobre construcciones absolutas.” Revista Española de Lingüística 251:365–395.Google Scholar
. 1999. “La predicación. Las oraciones copulativas.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, vol. 21, 2357–2460. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Jacqueline F. Moise. 1997. “Pragmatics in understanding what is said.” Cognition 621: 51–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gili Gaya, Samuel. 1961. Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Biblograf.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén, and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez. 2016. “Depictive secondary predicates in Spanish and the relative/absolute distinction.” In Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), ed. by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya, and Teresa O’Neill, 139–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hemanz, Maria Luïsa. 1988. “En torno a la sintaxis y la semántica de los complementos predicativos en español.” Estudi General 81: 7–27.Google Scholar
Hernanz, Maria Luïsa. 1991. “Spanish absolute constructions and aspect.” Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 11:75–128.Google Scholar
Hernanz, Maria Luïsa, and Avel·lina Suñer. 1999. “La predicación: La predicación no copulativa. Las construcciones absolutas.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, vol 21, 2525–2560. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Horno-Chéliz, María del Carmen, and José Manuel Igoa. 2017. “Adjetivos i-level y s-level. Nuevas evidencias experimentales.” Borealis 6/21: 103–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. “Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste.” Linguistics and Philosophy 281: 643–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel. 1994. “ Ser y estar: estado de la cuestión.” Barataria 11:182–205. [URL]Google Scholar
(ed.). 2018. “ Nuevas aportaciones sobre ser y estar.” (Special issue: Revista Española de Lingüísitica 48) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel, and Gonzalo Escribano. 2018. “El papel del aspecto gramatical en las construcciones con estar y adjetivos de propiedades.” Revista Española de Lingüísitica 481: 115–152: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel. 2015. “On word order in Spanish copular sentences.” In New perspectives on the study of ser and estar, ed. by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti, and Silvia Gumiel, 203–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti-Escandell, Victoria, and Jacopo Torregrossa. 2023. “The interpretation of null and overt subject pronouns in Spanish compared to Greek and Italian: the role of VSO and DOM.” (under review)Google Scholar
López, Luis. 1994. “The internal structure of absolute small clauses.” Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 41:45–92.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. “A discourse-based account on Spanish ser/estar .” Linguistics 431: 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangialavori, M. Eugenia. 2013. “Not always a stage. Atypical patterns in Spanish copular clauses.” Iberia 5/21: 1–37.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael. 1996. “Aspectual Properties of Spanish Absolute Small Clauses.” Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 51:183–212.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Spanish adjectives within bounds.” In Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, ed. by Patricia Cabredo Hofherr, and Ora Matushansky, 307–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “ Ser y estar .” In Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 13–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mazzarella, Diana. 2013. “Associative and inferential approaches to pragmatics: The state of the art of experimental investigation.” Methode – Analytic Perspectives 2(2): 172–194.Google Scholar
McNally, Louise. 1994. “Adjunct predicates and the individual/stage distinction.” Proceedings of WCCFL 121: 561–576.Google Scholar
McNally, Louise, and Isadora Stojanovic. 2017. “Aesthetic adjectives.” In Semantics of aesthetic judgments, ed. by James O. Young, 17–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morimoto, Yuko, and María Victoria Pavón Lucero. 2007. Los verbos pseudo-copulativos del español. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve, and Billy Clark. 1999. “Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise.” Cognition 691: 337–354.Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira A. 2004. “Pragmatic inferences linked to logical terms.” In Experimental pragmatics, ed. by Ira A. Noveck and Dan Sperber, 301–321. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “On investigating intention in experimental pragmatics.” In Pre-proceedings of Trends in Experimental Pragmatics Workshop at Center for General Linguistics. Berlin, Germany; January 18–20, 2016. [URL]
Noveck, Ira A., and Anne Reboul. 2008. “Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (11): 425–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira A., Maryse Bianco, and Alain Castry. 2001. “The costs and benefits of metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol 16 (1): 109–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira, and Dan Sperber. 2007. “The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar inferences’.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 184–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Hazel. 2013. “A judge-free semantics for predicates of personal taste.” Journal of Semantics 30 (1): 103–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel. 2008. Las cláusulas absolutas. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Pérez Jiménez, Isabel, Manuel Leonetti, and Silvia Gumiel-Molina (eds.). 2015. New perspectives on the study of ser and estar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roby, David B. 2007. Aspect and the categorisation of states. The case of ser and estar in Spanish (PhD). The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Alonso, Sara, Ashwini Deo, and María Mercedes Piñango. 2017. “Copula distinction and constrained variability of copula use in Iberian and Mexican Spanish,” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 23/11. [URL]
Sánchez-Alonso, Sara. 2015. “Changes in the distributional patterns of the Spanish copulas: the influence of contextual modulation. Ms. [URL]
Saussure, Louis de. 2013. “Background relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 591: 178–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silvagni, Federico. 2018. “Sobre la distinción entre Individuo/Estadio y su relación con ser y estar.” Revista Española de Lingüística 481: 15–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2005. “Presuppositions and relevance.” In Semantics vs. pragmatics, ed. by Gendler Szabo, 329–355. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Francesco Cara, and Vittorio Girotto. 1995. “Relevance theory explains the selection task.” Cognition 571: 31–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Tamina. 2007. “Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste.” Linguistics and Philosophy 301: 487–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1985. The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste, and Dan Sperber. 2004. “Testing the cognitive and the communicative principles of relevance.” In Experimental pragmatics; ed. by Ira A. Noveck and Dan Sperber, 141–169. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 2000. “What is presupposition accommodation?” Ms MIT, Cambridge. [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Leonetti Escandell, Victoria & Jacopo Torregrossa
2024. The interpretation of null and overt subject pronouns in Spanish compared to Greek and Italian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
Gumiel-Molina, Silvia, Norberto Moreno-Quibén & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
2023. Perspectivized estar-sentences with aesthetic adjectives across American Spanish varieties. Spanish in Context 20:2 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.