Cover not available
Article published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 19:1 (2022) ► pp.99–121

A case for velarization of Spanish word-internal coda stops as hypercorrection

| Michigan State University
In many dialects of Spanish, a word such as aceptar /aseptáɾ/ ‘to accept’ may be variably produced as [asektáɾ]. Previous research has shown that velarization patterns are the result of speakers’ sensitivity to phonotactic distributions (Brown 2006; Bongiovanni 2022). This study examines a different result of pattern generalization: hypercorrection. The production of bilabial word-internal coda stops was analyzed in a corpus of sociolinguistic interviews from Mérida, Venezuela. Variation between retained, deleted and velarized variants ([aseptáɾ], [asetáɾ] and [asektáɾ]) is constrained primarily by age and education. While velarization was the preferred variant among older speakers regardless of their educational attainment status, for the younger cohort it was speakers in the lower educational attainment group who favored it. These linguistic patterns reflect known societal changes regarding access to education in Venezuela (and therefore, contact with the standard variety) and show that under the pressure of a prescriptive rule, speakers default to a non-normative generalized pattern.
Keywords: hypercorrection, Spanish, velarization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Building a case for velarization as hypercorrection
  • 3.Word-internal coda stops and variation patterns
  • 4.The present study
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Conditional inference tree and random forest analysis
    • 5.2Fixed effects logistic regression
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.19030.bon
References (63)
References
Alonso, Amado, and Rafael Lapesa. 1955. De la pronunciación medieval a la moderna en español. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar
Arias Alvarez, Beatriz. 2007. “Estudio sobre la realización de algunas consonantes en coda en el habla popular de la Ciudad de México: hacia una interpretación causal de los hechos.” Boletin de Filología 421: 11–35.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola, and Mercedes Sedano. 1992. “El español hablado en Venezuela.” In Historia y presente del español de América, ed. by César Hernández Alonso, 775–802. Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León.Google Scholar
Bongiovanni, Silvina. 2014a. “‘¿Tomas [pepsi],[peksi] or [pesi]?’: A variationist sociolinguistic analysis of Spanish syllable coda stops.” IULC Working Papers 14 (2).Google Scholar
. 2014b. Yo [asépto], tú [aséktas], él [aséta]: A sociolinguistic analysis of word-internal syllable-coda stops in the Spanish of Mérida, Venezuela. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
. 2022. “Velarization of word-internal syllable coda stops.” In The Routledge Handbook of Variation Approaches to Spanish, ed. by Manuel Díaz-Campos, 53–65.Google Scholar
Breiman, Leo. 2001. “Random forests.” Machine Learning 451: 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breiman, Leo, Jerome Friedman, Charles J. Stone, and Richard A. Olshen. 1984. Classification and regression trees. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Briceño, Diana, María F. Fernández, Jhon Maldonado, Juan Velazco, and Pamela Palm. 2010. “Un nuevo corpus sociolingüístico del habla de Mérida: PRESEEA-MÉRIDA-VE.” Lengua y Habla 14 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Brown, Esther. 2006. “Velarization of labial, coda stops in Spanish: A frequency account.” Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 44 (2): 47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Barbara E., and Almeida J. Toribio. 2010. “Correcting the record on Dominican [s]-hypercorrection.” In Romance linguistics 2009: selected papers from the 39th linguistic symposium on romance languages, ed. by Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea, and Ana Carvalho. 15–24. New York: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “An experimental approach to hypercorrection in Dominican Spanish.” In Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013, ed. by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras, and Elena Valenzuela, 251–268. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Barbara. E., Almeida. J. Toribio, and Mark Amengual. 2014. “The status of s in Dominican Spanish.” Lingua 1431: 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calcaño, Julio. 1897. El castellano en Venezuela; estudio crítico. Caracas: Tipografía universal.Google Scholar
Canfield, D. Lincoln. 1963. La pronunciación del español en América: Ensayo histórico descriptivo. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
. 1981. Spanish pronunciation in the Americas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caravedo, Rocío. 1987. “El Perú en el atlas lingüístico hispanoamericano.” Lexis 11 (2): 165–182.Google Scholar
. 1990. Sociolingüística del español de Lima. Lima: Fondo editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Chappell, Whitney. 2014. “Reanalysis and Hypercorrection Among Extreme /s/ Reducers.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20 (2): 31–40.Google Scholar
Chela-Flores, Godsuno. 1988. “Consonantes mínimas y metacondiciones en el Caribe Hispánico.” In Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de la América Latina, ed. by Marina Arjona Iglesias, 655–662. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel. 1999. “La velarización de /p b t d/ en posición final de sílaba en el español de Venezuela.” Lingua Americana 3 (5): 7–25.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel, Steven Fafulas, and Michael Gradoville. 2011. “Going Retro: An analysis of the interplay between socioeconomic class and age in Caracas Spanish.” In Selected proceedings of the 5th workshop in Spanish sociolinguistics, ed. by Jim Michnowicz, and Robin Dodsworth, 65–78. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Steven N. 2012. A history of the Spanish lexicon: a linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flórez, Luis. 1963. “El español hablado en Colombia y su atlas lingüístico.” Thesaurus 1 (2): 268–356.Google Scholar
. 1964. “El español hablado en Santander: Notas de pronunciación.” Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología 41: 71–94.Google Scholar
Fradejas Ruedas, José Manuel. 1997. Fonología Histórica del Español. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Frago Gracia, Juan Antonio. 1989. “El aragonesismo lingüístico de Juan de Luna.” Archivo de filología aragonesa 421: 9–20.Google Scholar
. 1993. Historia de las hablas andaluzas. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Tradición e innovación ortográfica en manuscritos mexicanos.” In Estudio de grafemática en el dominio hispánico, ed. by José Manuel Blecua, Juan Gutiérrez, and Lidia Sala, 97–121. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
. 1999. Historia del español de América. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
. 2002. Textos y normas: Comentarios lingüísticos. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Tradición e innovación en el español americano de la Independencia.” Romance Philology 61 (2): 147–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Notas lingüísticas en José Peguero: la cuestión normativa hacia la época de las independencias.” Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 291: 9–32.Google Scholar
. 2015. Don Quijote. Lengua y sociedad. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Geckeler, Horst, and Jaime Ocampo Marín. 1973. “La posición del habla andina de Venezuela en el marco de la dialectología hispanoamericana.” Vox Romanica 321: 66–94.Google Scholar
González, Jorge. 1991. “Análisis fonológico de algunos procesos que intervienen en al producción de las consonantes obstruyentes en posición postnuclear del español venezolano.” Letras 481: 133–152.Google Scholar
González, Jorge, and María H. Pereda. 1998. “Procesos postnucleares de las obstruyentes oclusivas en el habla caraqueña.” Letras 561: 53–64.Google Scholar
Guitart, Jorge M. 1981. “Sobre la posteriorización de las consonantes posnucleares en el español antillano: Reexamen teórico-descriptivo.” In IV Simposio de Dialectología del Caribe Hispánico, ed. by Orlando Alba, 133–142. Santiago, República Dominicana: Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2014. Los sonidos del español. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D., and Julie Auger. 1992. “Quantitative evidence, qualitative hypercorrection, sociolinguistic variables – and French speakers”eadhaches with English h/Ø.” Language & Communication 12 (3–4): 195–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel. E. 2009. “Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis.” Language and linguistics compass 3 (1): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1973. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometrics 331: 159–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael. 1981. Historia de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
López Morales, Humberto. 1965. “Neutralizaciones fonológicas en el consonantismo final del español de Cuba.” Anuario de letras. Lingüística y filología 51: 183–190.Google Scholar
Mora de González, Elena. 1989. “Las obstruyentes implosivas: un proceso de variabilidad.” Revue de Phonetique Appliquee 91–931: 161–175.Google Scholar
Morgan, Terrell A. 1998. “The linguistic parameters of /s/-insertion in Dominican Spanish: A case study in qualitative hypercorrection.” In Proceedings of the First Hispanic Linguistics Colloquium, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, and José del Valle, 79–96. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Naro, Anthony J., and María Marta P. Scherre. 2013. “Remodeling the age variable: Number concord in Brazilian Portuguese.” Language Variation and Change 25 (1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Drifting toward the standard language: A panel study of number concord in Brazilian Portuguese.” In Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory, ed. by Rena Torres Cacoullos, Nathalie Dion, and André Lapierre, 149–164. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Naro, Anthony J., Maria Marta P. Scherre, Camila Foeger, and Samine de Almeida Benfica. 2017. “Linguistic and social embedding of variable concord with 1st plural nós ‘we’in Brazilian Portuguese.” In Studies on variation in Portuguese, ed. by Pilar Barbosa, Maria da Conceição de Paiva, and Celeste Rodrigues, 219–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris-Northall, Ray. 2006. “Reduction of Variation as a Feature of the Standardization of Castilian Spanish around 1500.” In Variation and Reconstruction, ed. by Thomas D. Cravens, 89–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez Cedeño, Rafael. 1988. “Structure-preserving properties of an epenthetic rule in Spanish.” In Advances in Romance Linguistics, ed. by David Birdsong and Jean-Pierre Montreuil, 319–335. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Obediente, Enrique. 1992. “El sistema fonológico del español hablado en Venezuela.” In El idioma español de la Venezuela actual, ed. by Alexandra Álvarez, Paola Bentivoglio, Enrique Obediente, Mercedes Sedano, and María J. Tejera, 22–45. Caracas: Lagoven.Google Scholar
. 1998. Fonética y Fonología. Mérida: Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Real Academia Española. 2011. Nueva gramática de la lengua española : fonética y fonología. Barcelona: Espasa Libros.Google Scholar
Rosenblat, Ángel. 1960. Buenas y malas palabras en el castellano de Venezuela. Caracas: Ediciones Edime.Google Scholar
Scherre, María Marta P., and Anthony J. Naro. 2014. “Sociolinguistic correlates of negative evaluation: Variable concord in Rio de Janeiro.” Language Variation and Change 26 (3): 331–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sally. A., and R. Harald Baayen. 2012. “Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice.” Language variation and change 24 (2): 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torsten, Hothorn, Kurt Hornik, and Achim Zeileis. 2006. “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15 (3): 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trigo, Lorenza. 1988. The phonological derivation and behavior of nasal glides (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2019, July. Education. February 2019 release. Retrieved from the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization website: [URL]