Cover not available
Review published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 2:2 (2005) ► pp.260–269
Book review

Raquel Hidalgo Downing. Tematización en el español hablado. Raquel Hidalgo Downing. Madrid: Gredos, 2003. 351 pp.

Reviewed by
Published online: 17 August 2005
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.2.2.10gom
References (48)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1989. “Themes and tails: The discourse function of dislocated elements”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 121. 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William. 1988. “The syntax, pragmatics, and socio-linguistics of left- and right-dislocation in French”. Lingua 751. 203–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Betsy K. 1985. The pragmatics of left detachment in spoken standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1979. Sintagmi nominali quantificati e costruzioni dislocate a sinistra. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa IX (4). 1525–1568.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola. 1993. “Full NPs in spoken Spanish: A discourse profile”. Linguistic perspectives on the romance languages ed. by W. Ashby, M. Mithun, G. Perissinotto, and E. Raposo. 211–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadiot, Pierre. 1992. “Matching syntax and pragmatics: A typology of topic and non-topic related constructions in spoken French”. Linguistics 301. 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Giorgio. 1982. “‘Topic’ constructions in some European languages and ‘Connectedness’”. Materials on left-dislocation ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk and Frans Zwarts. 93–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. Functional Grammar Series, 91. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause, 309–338; Part 2: Complex and derived constructions, 379–407. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.Google Scholar
D’Introno, Francesco. 1975. Sintaxist transformacional del español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Dorval, Bruce. (ed.) 1990. Conversational organization and its development. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela. 1997. “Discourse pragmatic functions of the theme constituent in spoken European Spanish”. Discourse and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar ed. by J. H. Connolly, R. Vismans, C. Butler and R. Gatward. 137–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro, and Elinor Ochs. 1979. “Left dislocation in Italian conversation”. Syntax and semantics. Discourse and syntax, Vol. 121 ed. by Talmy Givón. 337–416. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. “Topic introduction in English conversation”. Transactions of the Philolotgical Society 91–92. 181–214.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann and Talmy Givón. eds. 1995. Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. “Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement”. Subject and Topic ed. by Charles Li. 151–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. ed. 1979. Syntax and Semantics. Discourse and Syntax, Vol. 121. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. ed. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez-González, María Ángeles. 2001. The theme-topic interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Functional grammar and the dynamics of discourse”. A new architecture for functional grammar ed. by J. Lachlan Mackenzie and María Ángeles Gómez-Gonzálezs. 211–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis. 1997. Modeling discourse topic: Sequential relations and strategies of expository texts. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hannay, Michael. 1985. “Inferrability, discourse boundness and aub-topics”. Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar ed. by M. Bolkestein, A. Machtelt, Casper de Groot, and J. Mackenzie Lachlan. 49–63. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991 [1990]. “Pragmatic function assignment and word order variations in a functional grammar of English”. Journal of Pragmatics 161. 131–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, María Lluisa & José María Brucart. 1987. La sintaxis. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul. 1975. “On the source of left-hand NPs in French”. Linguistic Inquiry 61. 155–165.Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor and Bambi Shieffelin. 1976. “Foregrounding referents: A re-consideration of left-dislocation of left-dislocation in discourse”. Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 240–257.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1981. Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 711. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Eva. 1979. La dislocation en français. Étude de syntaxe générative. Études Romanes de Lund 281. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendieta, Eva & Isabel Molina. 1997. “Anteposición de objeto en el habla culta de México y Madrid”. Revista Española de Lingüística 27:2. 447–477.Google Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos. 1987. Fundamentos de sintaxis general. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
. 1991. Curso universitario de lingüística general, Vol. I1. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Las funciones informativas: Las perífrasis de relativo y otras construcciones perifrásticas”. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 31 ed. por I. Bosque y V. Demonte. 4245–4302. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981a. “Toward a taxonomy of Given-New information”. Radical pragmatics ed. by P. Cole. 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981b. “Topicalization, focus movement, and Yiddish movement: A pragmatic differentiation”. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 249–264.Google Scholar
1984. “Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional analysis”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol 4331. Discourses in reading and linguistics ed. by S. White and V. Teller. 213–225.Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa. 1980. “On left dislocation and topicalization in Spanish”. Linguistic Inquiry 11:2. 363–393.Google Scholar
Rodman, Robert. 1974. “On left-dislocation”. Papers in Linguistics 71. 437–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Izquierdo, Fernando. 1985. “Procedimientos de topicalización en el habla culta de Sevilla”. Sociolingüística Andaluza 31. 31–49.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax, reprinted as Infinite Syntax. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation”. Language 501. 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel. 1979. “The relevance of repair in syntax-to-conversation”. Syntax and semantics. Discourse and syntax, Vol. 121. ed. by T. Givón. 261–288. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1984. “Topicalización y pragmática del español”. Revista Española de Lingüística 141. 1–20.Google Scholar
. 1898. Sociolingüística. Teoría y análisis. Madrid: Alhambra.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1999. “Las funciones informativa: Tema y foco”. Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Vol. 31 ed por I. Bosque y V. Demonte. 4215–4245. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar