Beyond Rhetorical Questions
Assertive questions in everyday interaction
| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
This book uses Conversation Analysis methodology to analyze rhetorical and other questions that are designed to convey assertions, rather than seek new information. It shows how these question sequences unfold interactionally in naturally-occurring talk in a variety of settings, e.g., friends arguing over the phone, parents disciplining children, news interviews, and second language writing conferences. The questions are used across these widely different contexts to perform a number of related social actions such as accusations, challenges to prior turns, and complaints. Those used in institution settings, such as teacher-student conferences, orient to institutional norms and roles and can help accomplish institutional goals, e.g., eliciting student error correction. Both the interactional context in which these questions are embedded and the known epistemic authority of the questioner play a role in our understanding of these questions, i.e., what social actions the question is accomplishing in a particular interaction.
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar, 16] 2005. x, 183 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgments
|
ix–x
|
|
1. Introduction
|
1–7
|
|
2. Yes/No Reversed Polarity Questions
|
9–37
|
|
3. Wh- Reversed Polarity Questions
|
39–70
|
|
4. Yes/No Reversed Polarity Questions Used in Pedagogically Specific Practices
|
71–109
|
|
5. Alternative Question Error Correction Sequences
|
111–145
|
|
6. Conclusion
|
147–159
|
|
Appendix: Transcription Symbols
|
161
|
|
Notes
|
163–167
|
|
References
|
169–174
|
|
Name index
|
175–176
|
|
Subject index
|
177–182
|
Cited by
Cited by 102 other publications
No author info given
2012.
In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis,
► pp. 741 ff. 
No author info given
2015.
In The Concise Encyclopedia of Communication,
► pp. 510 ff.
Aina, Oluwasola A., Anthony Elisha Anowu & Tunde Olusola Opeibi
2018.
In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288],
► pp. 133 ff.
Antaki, Charles, Emma Richardson, Elizabeth Stokoe & Sara Willott
2015. Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 19:3 ► pp. 328 ff.
Aslan, Tugba
2021. ‘The sequential organisation of gossip talk’.
Discourse Studies 23:4 ► pp. 429 ff.
Betz, Emma & Andrea Golato
2008. Remembering Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions: The German Tokenachja.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 41:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Blythe, Joe, Rod Gardner, Ilana Mushin & Lesley Stirling
2018. Tools of Engagement: Selecting a Next Speaker in Australian Aboriginal Multiparty Conversations.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Boelé, Amy L.
2017. Does It Say That? Tensions in Teacher Questions When the Text Has the Final Say.
Reading & Writing Quarterly 33:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Bolden, Galina B. & Jeffrey D. Robinson
2011. Soliciting Accounts With Why-Interrogatives in Conversation.
Journal of Communication 61:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2016.
In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],
► pp. 113 ff.
Chiang, Shiao-Yun
2013. ‘The word isn't there!’: a Foucauldian approach to power negotiation in an instructional interaction across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
Critical Discourse Studies 10:3 ► pp. 298 ff.
Childs, Carrie
2012. ‘I’m not X, I just want Y’: Formulating ‘wants’ in interaction.
Discourse Studies 14:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Clayman, Steven E. & Laura Loeb
2018. Polar Questions, Response Preference, and the Tasks of Political Positioning in Journalism.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Clift, Rebecca
2012. Who Knew?: A View from Linguistics.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 45:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Clift, Rebecca, Paul Drew & Ian Hutchby
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Clifton, Jonathan
2017. Justifying the jihad.
Journal of Language and Politics 16:3 ► pp. 453 ff.
Dalgren, Sara
2017.
In Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction,
► pp. 37 ff.
Deeb, Hadi Nicholas
2013. Boiling Down to the M-Word at the California Supreme Court.
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 23:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
DEKHISSI, LAURIE
2016. Qu’est-ce t’as été te mêler de ça ?! Une « nouvelle » structure pour les questions rhétoriques conflictuelles.
Journal of French Language Studies 26:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Drake, Veronika
2015. Indexing Uncertainty: The Case of Turn-FinalOr.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Drake, Veronika
2021. Alternative questions and their responses in English interaction.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
ENFIELD, N. J., TANYA STIVERS, PENELOPE BROWN, CHRISTINA ENGLERT, KATARIINA HARJUNPÄÄ, MAKOTO HAYASHI, TRINE HEINEMANN, GERTIE HOYMANN, TIINA KEISANEN, MIRKA RAUNIOMAA, CHASE WESLEY RAYMOND, FEDERICO ROSSANO, KYUNG-EUN YOON, INGE ZWITSERLOOD & STEPHEN C. LEVINSON
2019. Polar answers.
Journal of Linguistics 55:2 ► pp. 277 ff.
Epperson, Terrence W. & Alan Zemel
2008. Reports, requests, and recipient design: The management of patron queries in online reference chats.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59:14 ► pp. 2268 ff.
Evans, Bryn & Richard Fitzgerald
2016. ‘It's Training Man’! Membership Categorization and the Institutional Moral Order of Basketball Training.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
FIRTH, ALAN & JOHANNES WAGNER
2007. Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishment: Elaborations on a Reconceptualized SLA.
The Modern Language Journal 91 ► pp. 800 ff.
FIRTH, ALAN & JOHANNES WAGNER
2007. Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishment: Elaborations on a Reconceptualized SLA.
The Modern Language Journal 91 ► pp. 800 ff.
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson
2010. Responses toWh-Questions in English Conversation.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 43:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Friedman, Debra A.
2020. Reflecting on the Research Interview as a Socializing Interaction.
TESOL Quarterly 54:1 ► pp. 266 ff.
Ghia, Elisa
2019.
In Reassessing Dubbing [Benjamins Translation Library, 148],
► pp. 212 ff.
Ghorbel, Hatem
2012.
In Social Informatics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7710],
► pp. 138 ff.
González-Lloret, Marta
2016.
In Emotion in Multilingual Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 266],
► pp. 289 ff.
Halonen, Mia & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2008. Using niin-interrogative to treat the prior speaker's action as an exaggeration.
Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Haugh, Michael & Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2015.
In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],
► pp. 99 ff.
Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute
2018. Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and
Peninsular) Spanish.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2 ► pp. 248 ff.
Hayashi, Makoto & Shuya Kushida
2013. Responding With Resistance toWh-Questions in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 46:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Heinemann, Trine
2008. Questions of accountability: yes—no interrogatives that are unanswerable.
Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Heritage, John
2012. Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 45:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hernández, Patricia, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. «Depuis quandle requin est un mammifère ?!?!?! » La pragmaticalisation de la séquence interrogativedepuis quand.
SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 12009 ff.
Hoey, Elliott M.
2014. Sighing in Interaction: Somatic, Semiotic, and Social.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 47:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Hosoda, Yuri & David Aline
2013. Two preferences in question–answer sequences in language classroom context.
Classroom Discourse 4:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Hosoda, Yuri & David Aline
2015. Single episode analysis of extended conflict talk sequences in second language classroom discussion.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Ikeda, Keiko & Don Bysouth
2013.
In Language Alternation, Language Choice and Language Encounter in International Tertiary Education [Multilingual Education, 5],
► pp. 31 ff.
Izadi, Ahmad
2017. Culture-generality and culture-specificity of face.
Pragmatics and Society 8:2 ► pp. 208 ff.
Karafoti, Eleni
2019. Attending to a possible complaint.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
Kasper, Gabriele
2008.
In Encyclopedia of Language and Education,
► pp. 1824 ff.
Kasper, Gabriele & Matthew T. Prior
2015. Analyzing Storytelling In TESOL Interview Research.
TESOL Quarterly 49:2 ► pp. 226 ff.
Kasper, Gabriele & Johannes Wagner
2014. Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics.
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34 ► pp. 171 ff.
Kent, Alexandra & Kobin H. Kendrick
2016. Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 272 ff.
Khamees, Khalid Sabie
2015. An Assessment of EFL Learners' Ability to Identify and Interpret Rhetorical Questions: A Pragmatic Perspective Study.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Kim, Mary Shin
2014. Reported Thought as a Stance-Taking Device in Korean Conversation.
Discourse Processes 51:3 ► pp. 230 ff.
Kim, Mary Shin & Stephanie Hyeri Kim
2014. Initiating Repair With and Without Particles: Alternative Formats of Other-Initiation of Repair in Korean Conversation.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 47:4 ► pp. 331 ff.
Klattenberg, Revert
2020. Question-formatted reproaches in classroom management.
Classroom Discourse ► pp. 1 ff.
Koike, Chisato
2015. Affect-Loaded Questions in Japanese Storytelling: An Analysis of Grammar, Prosody, and Body Movements of Story Recipients’ Questions.
Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:05 ► pp. 481 ff.
Koschmann, Timothy & Alan Zemel
2009. Optical Pulsars and Black Arrows: Discoveries as Occasioned Productions.
Journal of the Learning Sciences 18:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Koshik, Irene
2005. Alternative questions used in conversational repair.
Discourse Studies 7:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Koshik, Irene
2008.
In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,
Koshik, Irene
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,
Koshik, Irene
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,
► pp. 1 ff.
Koshik, Irene
2017.
In Enabling Human Conduct [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 273],
► pp. 81 ff.
Laanesoo, Kirsi
2016. Targeting question’s inappositeness: The Estonian kus ‘where’-interrogative in the second position.
Discourse Studies 18:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
Laanesoo, Kirsi & Leelo Keevallik
2017. Noticing Breaches with Nonpolar Interrogatives: EstonianKes(“Who”) Ascribing Responsibility for Problematic Conduct.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:3 ► pp. 286 ff.
Lehmann, Devra
2011. Homosexuality in Classroom Discourse at an American Modern Orthodox High School.
Journal of Jewish Education 77:2 ► pp. 116 ff.
Lukin, Annabelle
2013. Evaluating questions in journalism: A case study of the Australian public broadcaster’s coverage of the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9:1
McDowell, Joanne & Revert Klattenberg
2019. Does gender matter? A cross-national investigation of primary class-room discipline.
Gender and Education 31:8 ► pp. 947 ff.
Najjar, Ibrahim & Kais Amir Kadhim
2021. Religious Translation between Arabic and English, with Reference to Quranic Rhetorical Questions.
Respectus Philologicus :39 (44)
Normandin, Shawn
2021. The Task of the Chinese Translator: Charles Bernstein’s “A Test of Poetry”.
ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews ► pp. 1 ff.
Nukuto, Hirokazu
2017. Code choice between L1 and the target language in English learning and teaching: a case study of Japanese EFL classrooms.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
OAKLEY, TODD & VERA TOBIN
2014. The whole is sometimes less than the sum of its parts: toward a theory of document acts.
Language and Cognition 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Park, Innhwa
2012. Asking different types of polar questions: The interplay between turn, sequence, and context in writing conferences.
Discourse Studies 14:5 ► pp. 613 ff.
Park, Innhwa
2017. Questioning as advice resistance: writing tutorial interactions with L2 writers.
Classroom Discourse 8:3 ► pp. 253 ff.
Pethica, Stefania, Jonathan Hill, Katy Jones, Paul Tranter, Steve Riley, Heather Lee & Michaela Swales
2020. Developing the therapeutic conversation: a conversation analysis of information giving in Family Domains Therapy.
Journal of Family Therapy 42:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn
2020. Shaming interrogatives: Admonishments, the social psychology of emotion, and discursive practices of behaviour modification in family mealtimes.
British Journal of Social Psychology 59:2 ► pp. 347 ff.
Prediger, Susanne, Uta Quasthoff, Anna-Marietha Vogler & Vivien Heller
2015. How to Elaborate What Teachers Should Learn? Five Steps for Content Specification of Professional Development Programs, Exemplified By “Moves Supporting Participation in Classroom Discussions”.
Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 36:2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Radford, Julie
2010. Adult participation in children's word searches: on the use of prompting, hinting, and supplying a model.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 24:2 ► pp. 83 ff.
Radulović, Milica & Vladimir Ž. Jovanović
2020. The pragmeme of disagreement and its allopracts in English and Serbian political interview discourse.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:4 ► pp. 586 ff.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift & John Heritage
2021. Reference without anaphora: on agency through grammar.
Linguistics 59:3 ► pp. 715 ff.
Raymond, Geoffrey & Jack Sidnell
2019. Interaction at the Boundaries of a World Known in Common: Initiating Repair with “What Do You Mean?”.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Reynolds, Edward
2015. How participants in arguments challenge the normative position of an opponent.
Discourse Studies 17:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2009. Managing Counterinformings: An Interactional Practice for Soliciting Information that Facilitates Reconciliation of Speakers' Incompatible Positions.
Human Communication Research 35:4 ► pp. 561 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2020. One Type of Polar, Information-Seeking Question and Its Stance of Probability: Implications for the Preference for Agreement.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2020. Revisiting Preference Organization in Context: A Qualitative and Quantitative Examination of Responses to Information Seeking.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. & Galina B. Bolden
2010. Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: The case of explicit account solicitations.
Discourse Studies 12:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Sandhu, Priti
2016.
In Emotion in Multilingual Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 266],
► pp. 153 ff.
Schellenberg, Ryan S.
2018. Did Paul Refuse an Offer of Support from the Corinthians?.
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 40:3 ► pp. 312 ff.
Seuren, Lucas M., Mike Huiskes & Tom Koole
2018. Resolving knowledge discrepancies in informing sequences.
Language in Society 47:3 ► pp. 409 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2007. Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis.
Annual Review of Anthropology 36:1 ► pp. 229 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2008. Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities1.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:4 ► pp. 477 ff.
Strong, Tom & Helen F. Massfeller
2010. Negotiating Post-Consultation ‘Homework’ Tasks Between Counselors and Clients.
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 32:1 ► pp. 14 ff.
Strong, Tom & Katie Turner
2008. Resourceful Dialogues: Eliciting and Mobilizing Client Competencies and Resources.
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 38:4 ► pp. 185 ff.
Sugiura, Hideyuki
2017. Expressing an alternative view from second position: Reversed polarity questions in everyday Japanese conversation.
Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
Tabacaru, Sabina
2017. When language bites
.
Pragmatics & Cognition 24:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Ticca, Anna-Claudia & Veronique Traverso
2016. When questioners count on recipients’ lack of knowledge.
Pragmatics and Society 7:4 ► pp. 618 ff.
Tracy, Karen & Jessica Robles
2009. Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction.
Discourse Studies 11:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Tracy, Karen & Jessica S. Robles
2010. Challenges of Interviewers' Institutional Positionings: Taking Account of Interview Content and the Interaction.
Communication Methods and Measures 4:3 ► pp. 177 ff.
Van De Mieroop, Dorien & Jonathan Clifton
2012. The interactional negotiation of group membership and ethnicity: The case of an interview with a former slave.
Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Van De Mieroop, Dorien & Jonathan Clifton
2014. The discursive management of identity in interviews with female former colonials of the Belgian Congo.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Vehviläinen, Sanna
2009. Student-Initiated Advice in Academic Supervision.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 42:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Wang, Yunhong
2020.
In English Translations of Shuihu Zhuan,
► pp. 83 ff.
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2007. The multi-functionality of accounts in advice giving.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:3 ► pp. 367 ff.
Weatherall, Ann & Leelo Keevallik
2016. When Claims of Understanding Are Less Than Affiliative.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 167 ff.
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
2006. Initiating Repair and Beyond: The Use of Two Repeat-Formatted Repair Initiations in Mandarin Conversation.
Discourse Processes 41:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018.
In On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General