Appositive Relative Clauses in English
Discourse functions and competing structures
| University of Lille & STL laboratory, UMR 8163, CNRS
This book sheds new light on Appositive Relative Clauses (ARCs), a structure that is generally studied from a merely syntactic point of view, in opposition to Determinative (or Restrictive) Relative Clauses (DRCs). In this volume, ARCs are examined from a discourse/pragmatic point of view, independently of DRCs, in order to provide a positive definition of the structure. After a presentation of the morphosyntactic, semantic and pragmatic characteristics of ARCs, a taxonomy of their functions in discourse is established for both written and spoken English based on the results of a corpus-based investigation. Constraints are then defined within an information-packaging approach to syntactic structures to show why speakers choose ARCs over other competing allostructures, i.e. syntactic structures that fulfil similar discourse functions (e.g. nominal appositives, independent clauses, adverbials, noun premodifiers, topicalization). The end result is a deeper understanding of the richness of ARCs in their natural contexts of use.
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar, 22] 2010. xiii, 232 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
xiii
|
|
Introduction
|
1–3
|
|
Part I. Appositive relative clauses (ARCs)
|
|
|
Chapter 1. Definitions and previous studies
|
7–52
|
|
Chapter 2. Atypical appositive relative clauses
|
53–73
|
|
Part II. The discourse functions of ARCs
|
|
|
Chapter 3. The corpus: ARCs in usage
|
77–93
|
|
Chapter 4. The discourse functions of ARCs: A taxonomy
|
95–139
|
|
Part III. ARCs and their competing “allostructures”
|
|
|
Chapter 5. Definition of ARCs' allostructures, with particular emphasis on nominal appositives
|
143–189
|
|
Chapter 6. Appositive relative clauses and their other competing
allostructures
|
191–215
|
|
Conclusion
|
217–218
|
|
References
|
219–226
|
|
Appendix
|
227–229
|
|
Index
|
231
|
“Theoretically, the book enhances our understanding of the functioning of ARCs in discourse. Practically, the findings of the study can help the reader to know when and how ARCs can be used. This book is suitable for scholars and students who are interested in the study of syntactical structures in discourse, especially the relation between form and function, and those who want to use language more efficiently. This well-organized book presents us with a new picture of the use of ARCs in different registers and styles and in both written and spoken modes.”
Xinzhang Yang, Xiamen University, Discourse Studies, Volume 14(6), 2012, pages 812-814.
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Burke, Isabelle
2017. Wicked Which: The Linking Relative in Australian English.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 37:3 ► pp. 356 ff. 
Collins, Chris & Andrew Radford
2015. Gaps, ghosts and gapless relatives in spoken English.
Studia Linguistica 69:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
CORNISH, FRANCIS
2018. Revisiting the system of English relative clauses: structure, semantics, discourse functionality.
English Language and Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 431 ff.
Loock, Rudy
2013. Extending further and refining Prince’s taxonomy of given/new information.
Pragmatics 23:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Loock, Rudy & Kathleen M. O’Connor
2013. The Discourse Functions of Nonverbal Appositives.
Journal of English Linguistics 41:4 ► pp. 332 ff.
Ruiz Yamuza, Emilia
2017.
In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190],
► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Linguistics
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2010002102