Cover not available
Part of
Investigating West Germanic Languages: Studies in honor of Robert B. Howell
Edited by Jennifer Hendriks and B. Richard Page
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 8] 2024
► pp. 14–31

Homorganic lengthening in late Old English revisited

| The Pennsylvania State University
Minkova & Stockwell (1992) and Kruger (2020) claim that homorganic lengthening is limited to the environment before -ld and -nd, with only high vowels lengthening before -nd. This paper examines evidence in the Ormulum and from other sources for lengthening and finds ample evidence of regular vowel lengthening before -ld, -nd, -mb, -rd, and -rn. The cross-linguistic tendency of phonetic lengthening of vowels and sonorants in sequences of vowel plus sonorant plus homorganic voiced consonant provided a phonetic motivation for the lengthening. Already existing Old English words like frēond ‘friend’ and fēond ‘fiend’ served as a basis for a phonological reanalysis of the phonetically lengthened vowel as underlyingly long.
Keywords: quantity, vowel lengthening, Ormulum, historical phonology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A bird’s eye view of homorganic lengthening
  • 3.Evidence of homorganic lengthening in the Ormulum
  • 4.The motivation for homorganic lengthening
  • 5.The distribution of lengthened reflexes of homorganic lengthening in PDE revisited
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.8.02pag
References (31)
References
Brate, Erik. 1885. Nordische Lehnwörter im Orrmulum. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literature 10. 1–80.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22. 129–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilers, Friedrich. 1907. Die Dehnung vor dehnenden Konsonantenverbindungen im Mittelenglischen (Studien zur englischen Philologie 26). Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fulk, R. D. 1999. Evaluating the evidence for lengthening before homorganic consonant clusters in the Ormulum. In Carr, Gerald F., W. Harbert & Lihua Zhang (eds.), Interdigitations: Essays for Irmengard Rauch, 201–209. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Holm, Sigurd. 1922. Corrections and additions in the Ormulum manuscript. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar
Holt, Robert (ed.). 1878. The Ormulum, with notes and glossary of Dr. R.M. White. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Howell, Robert B. 1986. Tracing the origin of uvular R in the Germanic languages. Folia Linguistica Historica 7(2). 317–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Old English breaking and its Germanic analogues. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, Robert B. & Joseph C. Salmons. 1997. Umlautless residues in Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9(1). 83–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, Robert B. & Katerina Somers Wicka. 2007. A phonetic account of Anglian smoothing. Folia Linguistica Historica 28(1–2). 187–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 2007 [1954]. A Modern English grammar on historical principles: Part I – Sounds and Spelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard. 1968. Handbuch der mittelenglischen Grammatik. 3rd edn. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kruger, William W. 2020. Homorganic cluster lengthening, pre-cluster shortening and preference-based change in Early English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10. 87–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1898. Die Quantitätsveränderungen im Laufe der englischen Sprachentwicklung. Anglia 20. 335–362.Google Scholar
. 1921. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 1991. The history of final vowels in English. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2009. Inflectional syncope vs. epenthesis: Notes on the history of weak preterites in English. In Minkova, Donka (ed.), Phonological weakness in English: From Old to Present-Day English, 316–346. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2014. A historical phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka & Robert Stockwell 1992. Homorganic clusters as moric busters: -ld, -nd, -mb. In Rissanen, Matti, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), History of Englishes, 191–206. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, An-Nah. 2004. Constraints on homorganic cluster lengthening in Early English: A unified account of vowel lengthening and shortening. Language Research 40(2). 353–376.Google Scholar
OED 2021 = OED Online, Oxford University Press, December 2021, [URL].
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., R. A. Hendrick & M. F. Miller (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Page, B. Richard & Nicholas Babich. 2018. The environment of homorganic lengthening: Evidence from the Ormulum. Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference 24, May 11, 2018, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Parkes, Malcolm B. 1983. On the presumed date and possible origin of the manuscript of the ‘Ormulum’: Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Junius 1. In Stanley, E. G. & Douglas Gray (eds.), Five hundred years of words and sounds: A Festschrift for Eric Dobson, 115–127. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty. 1981. The phonetic basis of a Late Old English sound change. In Dressler, W. U., O. E. Pfeiffer, & J. R. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1980: Akten der 4. Internationalen Phonologie-Tagung, 337–341. Innsbruck: Institute für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & C. L. Wrenn. 1957. An Old English Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus & Kamil Kazmierski. 2015. How rarities like gold came to exist: On co-evolutionary interactions between morphology and lexical phonotactics. English Language and Linguistics 20(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Welna, Jerzy. 2000. Some remarks on the nonprimary contexts for Homorganic Lengthening. In Taavitsainen, Irma, Terttu Nevalainen, Païvi Pahta & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Placing Middle English in context, 475–487. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Mary Elizabeth Wright. 1923. An elementary Middle English grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar